THE JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF LEGAL PRPOSITIONS UNDER THE HART AND DWORKIN’S DEBATE
In a context of relativization the division between creation and application of the law, the article aims to analyze, under the analytical and conceptual perspective of philosophy, the problem of the degree of interpretative freedom, the (in) determination of law, the existence or not of correct ans...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
2018-05-01
|
| Series: | Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/28192 |
| _version_ | 1811328562852003840 |
|---|---|
| author | Loiane Prado Verbicaro |
| author_facet | Loiane Prado Verbicaro |
| author_sort | Loiane Prado Verbicaro |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In a context of relativization the division between creation and application of the law, the article aims to analyze, under the analytical and conceptual perspective of philosophy, the problem of the degree of interpretative freedom, the (in) determination of law, the existence or not of correct answer and the need for judicial discretion in the strong or weak sense, from the study of the truth of legal propositions conditions and discussions about the possibility of objectively true interpretative judgments through realism and semantic anti-realism.
The bibliographical research of qualitative approach focuses on the analysis of Hartian positivism and the interpretativism of Ronald Dworkin. Contrary to Dworkin's theory that even in difficult cases legal propositions present a truth value, research is aligned with Hartian thinking, which considers that the existence of difficult cases leads to the indeterminacy of law and to the idea that certain propositions lack the value of truth. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T15:27:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fbf0116f2bc54d7ab0560cb46dc813b0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1981-3694 1981-3694 |
| language | Portuguese |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T15:27:18Z |
| publishDate | 2018-05-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
| spelling | doaj.art-fbf0116f2bc54d7ab0560cb46dc813b02022-12-22T02:41:28ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaRevista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM1981-36941981-36942018-05-0113113315810.5902/198136942819214712THE JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF LEGAL PRPOSITIONS UNDER THE HART AND DWORKIN’S DEBATELoiane Prado Verbicaro0Centro Universitário do ParáIn a context of relativization the division between creation and application of the law, the article aims to analyze, under the analytical and conceptual perspective of philosophy, the problem of the degree of interpretative freedom, the (in) determination of law, the existence or not of correct answer and the need for judicial discretion in the strong or weak sense, from the study of the truth of legal propositions conditions and discussions about the possibility of objectively true interpretative judgments through realism and semantic anti-realism. The bibliographical research of qualitative approach focuses on the analysis of Hartian positivism and the interpretativism of Ronald Dworkin. Contrary to Dworkin's theory that even in difficult cases legal propositions present a truth value, research is aligned with Hartian thinking, which considers that the existence of difficult cases leads to the indeterminacy of law and to the idea that certain propositions lack the value of truth.https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/28192condições de verdade, discricionariedadeinterpretativismopositivismoresposta correta. |
| spellingShingle | Loiane Prado Verbicaro THE JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF LEGAL PRPOSITIONS UNDER THE HART AND DWORKIN’S DEBATE Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM condições de verdade, discricionariedade interpretativismo positivismo resposta correta. |
| title | THE JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF LEGAL PRPOSITIONS UNDER THE HART AND DWORKIN’S DEBATE |
| title_full | THE JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF LEGAL PRPOSITIONS UNDER THE HART AND DWORKIN’S DEBATE |
| title_fullStr | THE JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF LEGAL PRPOSITIONS UNDER THE HART AND DWORKIN’S DEBATE |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF LEGAL PRPOSITIONS UNDER THE HART AND DWORKIN’S DEBATE |
| title_short | THE JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF LEGAL PRPOSITIONS UNDER THE HART AND DWORKIN’S DEBATE |
| title_sort | judicial discretion and the truth conditions of legal prpositions under the hart and dworkin s debate |
| topic | condições de verdade, discricionariedade interpretativismo positivismo resposta correta. |
| url | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/28192 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT loianepradoverbicaro thejudicialdiscretionandthetruthconditionsoflegalprpositionsunderthehartanddworkinsdebate AT loianepradoverbicaro judicialdiscretionandthetruthconditionsoflegalprpositionsunderthehartanddworkinsdebate |