Statistics of geomagnetic storms: Global simulations perspective

We present results of 131 geomagnetic storm simulations using the University of Michigan Space Weather Modeling Framework Geospace configuration. We compare the geomagnetic indices derived from the simulation with those observed, and use 2D cuts in the noon-midnight planes to compare the magnetopaus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Austin Brenner, Qusai Al Shidi, Gabor Toth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2022.972150/full
_version_ 1818029189012389888
author Tuija I. Pulkkinen
Austin Brenner
Austin Brenner
Qusai Al Shidi
Gabor Toth
author_facet Tuija I. Pulkkinen
Austin Brenner
Austin Brenner
Qusai Al Shidi
Gabor Toth
author_sort Tuija I. Pulkkinen
collection DOAJ
description We present results of 131 geomagnetic storm simulations using the University of Michigan Space Weather Modeling Framework Geospace configuration. We compare the geomagnetic indices derived from the simulation with those observed, and use 2D cuts in the noon-midnight planes to compare the magnetopause locations with empirical models. We identify the location of the current sheet center and look at the plasma parameters to deduce tail dynamics. We show that the simulation produces geomagnetic index distributions similar to those observed, and that their relationship to the solar wind driver is similar to that observed. While the magnitudes of the Dst and polar cap potentials are close to those observed, the simulated AL index is consistently underestimated. Analysis of the magnetopause position reveals that the subsolar position agrees well with an empirical model, but that the tail flaring in the simulation is much smaller than that in the empirical model. The magnetotail and ring currents are closely correlated with the Dst index, and reveal a strong contribution of the tail current beyond 8 RE to the Dst index during the storm main phase.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T05:15:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbf96d33812f40139236cd24ebb76983
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-987X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T05:15:44Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
spelling doaj.art-fbf96d33812f40139236cd24ebb769832022-12-22T02:00:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2296-987X2022-09-01910.3389/fspas.2022.972150972150Statistics of geomagnetic storms: Global simulations perspectiveTuija I. Pulkkinen0Austin Brenner1Austin Brenner2Qusai Al Shidi3Gabor Toth4Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesDepartment of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesDepartment of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesDepartment of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesWe present results of 131 geomagnetic storm simulations using the University of Michigan Space Weather Modeling Framework Geospace configuration. We compare the geomagnetic indices derived from the simulation with those observed, and use 2D cuts in the noon-midnight planes to compare the magnetopause locations with empirical models. We identify the location of the current sheet center and look at the plasma parameters to deduce tail dynamics. We show that the simulation produces geomagnetic index distributions similar to those observed, and that their relationship to the solar wind driver is similar to that observed. While the magnitudes of the Dst and polar cap potentials are close to those observed, the simulated AL index is consistently underestimated. Analysis of the magnetopause position reveals that the subsolar position agrees well with an empirical model, but that the tail flaring in the simulation is much smaller than that in the empirical model. The magnetotail and ring currents are closely correlated with the Dst index, and reveal a strong contribution of the tail current beyond 8 RE to the Dst index during the storm main phase.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2022.972150/fullMHD simulationsmagnetosphere-ionophere couplingmagnetopausering currenttail currentgeomagnetic index and solar conditions
spellingShingle Tuija I. Pulkkinen
Austin Brenner
Austin Brenner
Qusai Al Shidi
Gabor Toth
Statistics of geomagnetic storms: Global simulations perspective
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
MHD simulations
magnetosphere-ionophere coupling
magnetopause
ring current
tail current
geomagnetic index and solar conditions
title Statistics of geomagnetic storms: Global simulations perspective
title_full Statistics of geomagnetic storms: Global simulations perspective
title_fullStr Statistics of geomagnetic storms: Global simulations perspective
title_full_unstemmed Statistics of geomagnetic storms: Global simulations perspective
title_short Statistics of geomagnetic storms: Global simulations perspective
title_sort statistics of geomagnetic storms global simulations perspective
topic MHD simulations
magnetosphere-ionophere coupling
magnetopause
ring current
tail current
geomagnetic index and solar conditions
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2022.972150/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tuijaipulkkinen statisticsofgeomagneticstormsglobalsimulationsperspective
AT austinbrenner statisticsofgeomagneticstormsglobalsimulationsperspective
AT austinbrenner statisticsofgeomagneticstormsglobalsimulationsperspective
AT qusaialshidi statisticsofgeomagneticstormsglobalsimulationsperspective
AT gabortoth statisticsofgeomagneticstormsglobalsimulationsperspective