The Interpretation of the Government of Terror by the Phenomenology of the Spirit and Its Position in Hegel’s Political Philosophy
The French Revolution is recognized as the first concrete presence of the modern individual in history, where he stands for the realization of right and liberty against the absolute power of the king and wants absolute freedom. But Hegel, despite much praise for the revolution, deals with Pathology...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2020-09-01
|
Series: | حکمت و فلسفه |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_12606_2bc676748b7b6559d2a5fb27b94b6b9b.pdf |
_version_ | 1827580843382538240 |
---|---|
author | Mahmoud Sufiani Mohammad Asghari Mohsen Bagherzadeh Meshkibaf |
author_facet | Mahmoud Sufiani Mohammad Asghari Mohsen Bagherzadeh Meshkibaf |
author_sort | Mahmoud Sufiani |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The French Revolution is recognized as the first concrete presence of the modern individual in history, where he stands for the realization of right and liberty against the absolute power of the king and wants absolute freedom. But Hegel, despite much praise for the revolution, deals with Pathology and critiques the meaning of will, freedom, and individuality in them. At the end of the Spirit chapter of Phenomenology, Hegel deals with the French Revolution, especially the era of terror and, in his dialectical space, rises to the battle by imagining the revolution from the absolute self-consciousness, absolute freedom, partial will, and general will, and proves Robespierre’ and the French nation’s abstract and hollow understanding of these terms. Hegel, after this criticism, also implicitly deals with Rousseau's critique as the foregrounding of the French conception of the meaning of these terms. After examining the outcome of absolute freedom and all its determinations to the end, Hegel redefines the fundamental terms in the Terror section and illustrates how public freedom and will are realized in his political thought system whereby penetrating into the absolute power and will, not only does the particular return to the individual again, but also realizes the whole inside him through outer mediators, and in this way, coming up with a very precise definition of the whole exclusive in individual and returning the external reality to the individual in a complex way. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:25:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fbff683c515f44b1b7ceb6c942011c1c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1735-3238 2476-6038 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:25:01Z |
publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | حکمت و فلسفه |
spelling | doaj.art-fbff683c515f44b1b7ceb6c942011c1c2023-12-18T10:46:52ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressحکمت و فلسفه1735-32382476-60382020-09-011663618610.22054/wph.2021.47338.177212606The Interpretation of the Government of Terror by the Phenomenology of the Spirit and Its Position in Hegel’s Political PhilosophyMahmoud Sufiani0Mohammad Asghari1Mohsen Bagherzadeh Meshkibaf2Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.Ph.D. Candidate of Philosophy, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.The French Revolution is recognized as the first concrete presence of the modern individual in history, where he stands for the realization of right and liberty against the absolute power of the king and wants absolute freedom. But Hegel, despite much praise for the revolution, deals with Pathology and critiques the meaning of will, freedom, and individuality in them. At the end of the Spirit chapter of Phenomenology, Hegel deals with the French Revolution, especially the era of terror and, in his dialectical space, rises to the battle by imagining the revolution from the absolute self-consciousness, absolute freedom, partial will, and general will, and proves Robespierre’ and the French nation’s abstract and hollow understanding of these terms. Hegel, after this criticism, also implicitly deals with Rousseau's critique as the foregrounding of the French conception of the meaning of these terms. After examining the outcome of absolute freedom and all its determinations to the end, Hegel redefines the fundamental terms in the Terror section and illustrates how public freedom and will are realized in his political thought system whereby penetrating into the absolute power and will, not only does the particular return to the individual again, but also realizes the whole inside him through outer mediators, and in this way, coming up with a very precise definition of the whole exclusive in individual and returning the external reality to the individual in a complex way.https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_12606_2bc676748b7b6559d2a5fb27b94b6b9b.pdfhegelrobespierrerousseaugeneral willpartial willterror |
spellingShingle | Mahmoud Sufiani Mohammad Asghari Mohsen Bagherzadeh Meshkibaf The Interpretation of the Government of Terror by the Phenomenology of the Spirit and Its Position in Hegel’s Political Philosophy حکمت و فلسفه hegel robespierre rousseau general will partial will terror |
title | The Interpretation of the Government of Terror by the Phenomenology of the Spirit and Its Position in Hegel’s Political Philosophy |
title_full | The Interpretation of the Government of Terror by the Phenomenology of the Spirit and Its Position in Hegel’s Political Philosophy |
title_fullStr | The Interpretation of the Government of Terror by the Phenomenology of the Spirit and Its Position in Hegel’s Political Philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed | The Interpretation of the Government of Terror by the Phenomenology of the Spirit and Its Position in Hegel’s Political Philosophy |
title_short | The Interpretation of the Government of Terror by the Phenomenology of the Spirit and Its Position in Hegel’s Political Philosophy |
title_sort | interpretation of the government of terror by the phenomenology of the spirit and its position in hegel s political philosophy |
topic | hegel robespierre rousseau general will partial will terror |
url | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_12606_2bc676748b7b6559d2a5fb27b94b6b9b.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahmoudsufiani theinterpretationofthegovernmentofterrorbythephenomenologyofthespiritanditspositioninhegelspoliticalphilosophy AT mohammadasghari theinterpretationofthegovernmentofterrorbythephenomenologyofthespiritanditspositioninhegelspoliticalphilosophy AT mohsenbagherzadehmeshkibaf theinterpretationofthegovernmentofterrorbythephenomenologyofthespiritanditspositioninhegelspoliticalphilosophy AT mahmoudsufiani interpretationofthegovernmentofterrorbythephenomenologyofthespiritanditspositioninhegelspoliticalphilosophy AT mohammadasghari interpretationofthegovernmentofterrorbythephenomenologyofthespiritanditspositioninhegelspoliticalphilosophy AT mohsenbagherzadehmeshkibaf interpretationofthegovernmentofterrorbythephenomenologyofthespiritanditspositioninhegelspoliticalphilosophy |