Validity, reliability and feasibility of a new observation rating tool and a post encounter rating tool for the assessment of clinical reasoning skills of medical students during their internal medicine clerkship: a pilot study
Abstract Background Systematic assessment of clinical reasoning skills of medical students in clinical practice is very difficult. This is partly caused by the lack of understanding of the fundamental mechanisms underlying the process of clinical reasoning. Methods We previously developed an observa...
Main Authors: | Catharina M. Haring, Claudia C. R. Klaarwater, Geert A. Bouwmans, Bernadette M. Cools, Petra J. M. van Gurp, Jos W. M. van der Meer, Cornelis T. Postma |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02110-8 |
Similar Items
-
Observable phenomena that reveal medical students' clinical reasoning ability during expert assessment of their history taking: a qualitative study
by: Catharina M. Haring, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Minding the gap: towards a shared clinical reasoning lexicon across the pre-clerkship/clerkship transition
by: Robin K. Ovitsh, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Referral rates in Swiss primary care with a special emphasis on reasons for encounter
by: Ryan Tandjung, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Assessing clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students during history taking with an empirically derived scale for clinical reasoning indicators
by: Sophie Fürstenberg, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
How Do Children Reason About Mirrors? A Comparison Between Adults, Typically Developed Children, and Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
by: Alessandro Soranzo, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)