Dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patients

This article considers the relationship between dehumanization, ontological representation of death, trust in physicians, and burden of care on the part of caregivers of terminally ill patients. One hundred informal caregivers (relatives and friends) of patients hospitalized in four hospice faciliti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ines Testoni, Giulia Sicari, Lucia Ronconi, Gianmarco Biancalani, Chiara Franco, Paolo Cottone, Robert Crupi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Medical Publishing 2021-10-01
Series:Health Psychology Research
Online Access:https://healthpsychologyresearch.scholasticahq.com/article/29052-dehumanization-and-burden-of-care-among-caregivers-of-terminally-ill-patients.pdf
_version_ 1818851391003688960
author Ines Testoni
Giulia Sicari
Lucia Ronconi
Gianmarco Biancalani
Chiara Franco
Paolo Cottone
Robert Crupi
author_facet Ines Testoni
Giulia Sicari
Lucia Ronconi
Gianmarco Biancalani
Chiara Franco
Paolo Cottone
Robert Crupi
author_sort Ines Testoni
collection DOAJ
description This article considers the relationship between dehumanization, ontological representation of death, trust in physicians, and burden of care on the part of caregivers of terminally ill patients. One hundred informal caregivers (relatives and friends) of patients hospitalized in four hospice facilities in northern Italy were involved. Of these, 77% were primary caregivers (those who mostly helped the patient). All of the participants were given a questionnaire comprising the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) to determine caregivers' burden in their roles, the *questionario post mortem (QPM)* (post mortem questionnaire) for the effectiveness of and their trust in the medical nursing team of palliative care services, the Testoni death representation scale (TDRS) to detect their ontological representations of death and the humanity attribution test (HAT) to investigate their attributions of humanity to terminally ill patients. Per the literature, the present results demonstrated higher burden levels for female caregivers and primary caregivers. In informal caregiving, the dehumanization of patients does not have any advantage in reducing the burden of care. Further studies are required to compare formal and informal caregivers concerning the effect of dehumanization.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T07:04:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fc17e562bb474dd387cc566ac8bbaaa1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2420-8124
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T07:04:16Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Open Medical Publishing
record_format Article
series Health Psychology Research
spelling doaj.art-fc17e562bb474dd387cc566ac8bbaaa12022-12-21T20:31:21ZengOpen Medical PublishingHealth Psychology Research2420-81242021-10-01Dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patientsInes TestoniGiulia SicariLucia RonconiGianmarco BiancalaniChiara FrancoPaolo CottoneRobert CrupiThis article considers the relationship between dehumanization, ontological representation of death, trust in physicians, and burden of care on the part of caregivers of terminally ill patients. One hundred informal caregivers (relatives and friends) of patients hospitalized in four hospice facilities in northern Italy were involved. Of these, 77% were primary caregivers (those who mostly helped the patient). All of the participants were given a questionnaire comprising the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) to determine caregivers' burden in their roles, the *questionario post mortem (QPM)* (post mortem questionnaire) for the effectiveness of and their trust in the medical nursing team of palliative care services, the Testoni death representation scale (TDRS) to detect their ontological representations of death and the humanity attribution test (HAT) to investigate their attributions of humanity to terminally ill patients. Per the literature, the present results demonstrated higher burden levels for female caregivers and primary caregivers. In informal caregiving, the dehumanization of patients does not have any advantage in reducing the burden of care. Further studies are required to compare formal and informal caregivers concerning the effect of dehumanization.https://healthpsychologyresearch.scholasticahq.com/article/29052-dehumanization-and-burden-of-care-among-caregivers-of-terminally-ill-patients.pdf
spellingShingle Ines Testoni
Giulia Sicari
Lucia Ronconi
Gianmarco Biancalani
Chiara Franco
Paolo Cottone
Robert Crupi
Dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patients
Health Psychology Research
title Dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patients
title_full Dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patients
title_fullStr Dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patients
title_short Dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patients
title_sort dehumanization and burden of care among caregivers of terminally ill patients
url https://healthpsychologyresearch.scholasticahq.com/article/29052-dehumanization-and-burden-of-care-among-caregivers-of-terminally-ill-patients.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT inestestoni dehumanizationandburdenofcareamongcaregiversofterminallyillpatients
AT giuliasicari dehumanizationandburdenofcareamongcaregiversofterminallyillpatients
AT luciaronconi dehumanizationandburdenofcareamongcaregiversofterminallyillpatients
AT gianmarcobiancalani dehumanizationandburdenofcareamongcaregiversofterminallyillpatients
AT chiarafranco dehumanizationandburdenofcareamongcaregiversofterminallyillpatients
AT paolocottone dehumanizationandburdenofcareamongcaregiversofterminallyillpatients
AT robertcrupi dehumanizationandburdenofcareamongcaregiversofterminallyillpatients