Comparison of Ranolazine and Trimetazidine on Glycemic Status in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases have become the leading cause of death around the globe and diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered to be a coronary artery disease (CAD) risk equivalent. Ranolazine, an anti anginal drug has been found to reduce Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diabetes patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandhiya Selvarajan, Steven Aibor Dkhar, Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai, Melvin George, Balachander Jayaraman, Adithan Chandrasekaran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5448/10594_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(NJAK)_PF2(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
_version_ 1818514977233829888
author Sandhiya Selvarajan
Steven Aibor Dkhar
Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai
Melvin George
Balachander Jayaraman
Adithan Chandrasekaran
author_facet Sandhiya Selvarajan
Steven Aibor Dkhar
Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai
Melvin George
Balachander Jayaraman
Adithan Chandrasekaran
author_sort Sandhiya Selvarajan
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases have become the leading cause of death around the globe and diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered to be a coronary artery disease (CAD) risk equivalent. Ranolazine, an anti anginal drug has been found to reduce Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diabetes patients with chronic angina. However the effect of another antianginal drug trimetazidine, on glycemic status is not clear. Aim: To compare the effect of ranolazine and trimetazidine on glycemic status in diabetic patients with CAD. Settings and Design: Patients diagnosed with CAD and diabetes mellitus attending Cardiology Out Patient Department (OPD), Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India were recruited for this randomized open label parallel arm trial. Materials and Methods: The study conducted from January2012 to April-2013 had 47 eligible patients diagnosed with CAD and diabetes mellitus. They were randomized to receive either ranolazine 500 mg BD or trimetazidine 35 mg BD for 12 weeks. HbA1c levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipid profile, QT and QTc intervals were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. Statistical Analysis: Unpaired t-test was used to compare the baseline characteristics of between the groups while comparison within the groups were done using Paired t-test. Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney U-tests were used for non parametric data. Graph pad instat version-3 was used for statistical analysis. Values were expressed as mean ± SD. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study could not find any change in HbA1c levels in both ranolazine and trimetazidine groups. The adverse effects reported from patients on ranolazine include angina, constipation, postural hypotension, headache, dizziness, nausea and weakness while patients on trimetazidine complained of constipation, weakness, palpitations, angina, dizziness, nausea, dyspepsia, headache, gastric discomfort, joint pain, etc. Conclusion: In patients with chronic angina and diabetes mellitus Ranolazine 500mg BD and Trimetazidine 35mg BD did not show any effect on HbA1c and fasting blood glucose lebel.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T00:23:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fc25b292049c4e6abe3f2031a79acf65
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T00:23:00Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-fc25b292049c4e6abe3f2031a79acf652022-12-22T01:27:41ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2015-01-0191OC01OC0510.7860/JCDR/2015/10594.5448Comparison of Ranolazine and Trimetazidine on Glycemic Status in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – A Randomized Controlled TrialSandhiya Selvarajan0Steven Aibor Dkhar1Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai2Melvin George3Balachander Jayaraman4Adithan Chandrasekaran5Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.Professor, Department of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.Assistant Professor, Cardiac Clinical Trials, Department of Cardiology, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India.Professor, Department of Cardiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.Senior Professor & Head, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases have become the leading cause of death around the globe and diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered to be a coronary artery disease (CAD) risk equivalent. Ranolazine, an anti anginal drug has been found to reduce Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diabetes patients with chronic angina. However the effect of another antianginal drug trimetazidine, on glycemic status is not clear. Aim: To compare the effect of ranolazine and trimetazidine on glycemic status in diabetic patients with CAD. Settings and Design: Patients diagnosed with CAD and diabetes mellitus attending Cardiology Out Patient Department (OPD), Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India were recruited for this randomized open label parallel arm trial. Materials and Methods: The study conducted from January2012 to April-2013 had 47 eligible patients diagnosed with CAD and diabetes mellitus. They were randomized to receive either ranolazine 500 mg BD or trimetazidine 35 mg BD for 12 weeks. HbA1c levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipid profile, QT and QTc intervals were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. Statistical Analysis: Unpaired t-test was used to compare the baseline characteristics of between the groups while comparison within the groups were done using Paired t-test. Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney U-tests were used for non parametric data. Graph pad instat version-3 was used for statistical analysis. Values were expressed as mean ± SD. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study could not find any change in HbA1c levels in both ranolazine and trimetazidine groups. The adverse effects reported from patients on ranolazine include angina, constipation, postural hypotension, headache, dizziness, nausea and weakness while patients on trimetazidine complained of constipation, weakness, palpitations, angina, dizziness, nausea, dyspepsia, headache, gastric discomfort, joint pain, etc. Conclusion: In patients with chronic angina and diabetes mellitus Ranolazine 500mg BD and Trimetazidine 35mg BD did not show any effect on HbA1c and fasting blood glucose lebel.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5448/10594_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(NJAK)_PF2(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdfglycemic statushba1cqtcranolazinetrimetazidine
spellingShingle Sandhiya Selvarajan
Steven Aibor Dkhar
Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai
Melvin George
Balachander Jayaraman
Adithan Chandrasekaran
Comparison of Ranolazine and Trimetazidine on Glycemic Status in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – A Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
glycemic status
hba1c
qtc
ranolazine
trimetazidine
title Comparison of Ranolazine and Trimetazidine on Glycemic Status in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Ranolazine and Trimetazidine on Glycemic Status in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Ranolazine and Trimetazidine on Glycemic Status in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ranolazine and Trimetazidine on Glycemic Status in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Ranolazine and Trimetazidine on Glycemic Status in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of ranolazine and trimetazidine on glycemic status in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease a randomized controlled trial
topic glycemic status
hba1c
qtc
ranolazine
trimetazidine
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5448/10594_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(NJAK)_PF2(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sandhiyaselvarajan comparisonofranolazineandtrimetazidineonglycemicstatusindiabeticpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stevenaibordkhar comparisonofranolazineandtrimetazidineonglycemicstatusindiabeticpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ajithananthakrishnapillai comparisonofranolazineandtrimetazidineonglycemicstatusindiabeticpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT melvingeorge comparisonofranolazineandtrimetazidineonglycemicstatusindiabeticpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT balachanderjayaraman comparisonofranolazineandtrimetazidineonglycemicstatusindiabeticpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT adithanchandrasekaran comparisonofranolazineandtrimetazidineonglycemicstatusindiabeticpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial