BENCHMARKING THE EXTRACTION OF 3D GEOMETRY FROM UAV IMAGES WITH DEEP LEARNING METHODS

3D reconstruction from single and multi-view stereo images is still an open research topic, despite the high number of solutions proposed in the last decades. The surge of deep learning methods has then stimulated the development of new methods using monocular (MDE, Monocular Depth Estimation), ster...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Nex, N. Zhang, F. Remondino, E. M. Farella, R. Qin, C. Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-10-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-1-W3-2023/123/2023/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-123-2023.pdf
_version_ 1827789376812220416
author F. Nex
N. Zhang
F. Remondino
E. M. Farella
R. Qin
C. Zhang
author_facet F. Nex
N. Zhang
F. Remondino
E. M. Farella
R. Qin
C. Zhang
author_sort F. Nex
collection DOAJ
description 3D reconstruction from single and multi-view stereo images is still an open research topic, despite the high number of solutions proposed in the last decades. The surge of deep learning methods has then stimulated the development of new methods using monocular (MDE, Monocular Depth Estimation), stereoscopic and Multi-View Stereo (MVS) 3D reconstruction, showing promising results, often comparable to or even better than traditional methods. The more recent development of NeRF (Neural Radial Fields) has further triggered the interest for this kind of solution. Most of the proposed approaches, however, focus on terrestrial applications (e.g., autonomous driving or small artefacts 3D reconstructions), while airborne and UAV acquisitions are often overlooked. The recent introduction of new datasets, such as UseGeo has, therefore, given the opportunity to assess how state-of-the-art MDE, MVS and NeRF 3D reconstruction algorithms perform using airborne UAV images, allowing their comparison with LiDAR ground truth. This paper aims to present the results achieved by two MDE, two MVS and two NeRF approaches levering deep learning approaches, trained and tested using the UseGeo dataset. This work allows the comparison with a ground truth showing the current state of the art of these solutions and providing useful indications for their future development and improvement.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T17:19:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fc2c917d9f2c4432bec06441225e3662
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1682-1750
2194-9034
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T17:19:11Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
spelling doaj.art-fc2c917d9f2c4432bec06441225e36622023-10-19T18:09:06ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342023-10-01XLVIII-1-W3-202312313010.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-123-2023BENCHMARKING THE EXTRACTION OF 3D GEOMETRY FROM UAV IMAGES WITH DEEP LEARNING METHODSF. Nex0N. Zhang1F. Remondino2E. M. Farella3R. Qin4C. Zhang5ITC Dep. of Earth Observation Science, University of Twente, Enschede, NetherlandsITC Dep. of Earth Observation Science, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands3D Optical Metrology (3DOM) unit, Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), Trento, Italy3D Optical Metrology (3DOM) unit, Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), Trento, ItalyGeospatial Data Analytics Laboratory, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USAGeospatial Data Analytics Laboratory, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA3D reconstruction from single and multi-view stereo images is still an open research topic, despite the high number of solutions proposed in the last decades. The surge of deep learning methods has then stimulated the development of new methods using monocular (MDE, Monocular Depth Estimation), stereoscopic and Multi-View Stereo (MVS) 3D reconstruction, showing promising results, often comparable to or even better than traditional methods. The more recent development of NeRF (Neural Radial Fields) has further triggered the interest for this kind of solution. Most of the proposed approaches, however, focus on terrestrial applications (e.g., autonomous driving or small artefacts 3D reconstructions), while airborne and UAV acquisitions are often overlooked. The recent introduction of new datasets, such as UseGeo has, therefore, given the opportunity to assess how state-of-the-art MDE, MVS and NeRF 3D reconstruction algorithms perform using airborne UAV images, allowing their comparison with LiDAR ground truth. This paper aims to present the results achieved by two MDE, two MVS and two NeRF approaches levering deep learning approaches, trained and tested using the UseGeo dataset. This work allows the comparison with a ground truth showing the current state of the art of these solutions and providing useful indications for their future development and improvement.https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-1-W3-2023/123/2023/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-123-2023.pdf
spellingShingle F. Nex
N. Zhang
F. Remondino
E. M. Farella
R. Qin
C. Zhang
BENCHMARKING THE EXTRACTION OF 3D GEOMETRY FROM UAV IMAGES WITH DEEP LEARNING METHODS
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
title BENCHMARKING THE EXTRACTION OF 3D GEOMETRY FROM UAV IMAGES WITH DEEP LEARNING METHODS
title_full BENCHMARKING THE EXTRACTION OF 3D GEOMETRY FROM UAV IMAGES WITH DEEP LEARNING METHODS
title_fullStr BENCHMARKING THE EXTRACTION OF 3D GEOMETRY FROM UAV IMAGES WITH DEEP LEARNING METHODS
title_full_unstemmed BENCHMARKING THE EXTRACTION OF 3D GEOMETRY FROM UAV IMAGES WITH DEEP LEARNING METHODS
title_short BENCHMARKING THE EXTRACTION OF 3D GEOMETRY FROM UAV IMAGES WITH DEEP LEARNING METHODS
title_sort benchmarking the extraction of 3d geometry from uav images with deep learning methods
url https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-1-W3-2023/123/2023/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-123-2023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fnex benchmarkingtheextractionof3dgeometryfromuavimageswithdeeplearningmethods
AT nzhang benchmarkingtheextractionof3dgeometryfromuavimageswithdeeplearningmethods
AT fremondino benchmarkingtheextractionof3dgeometryfromuavimageswithdeeplearningmethods
AT emfarella benchmarkingtheextractionof3dgeometryfromuavimageswithdeeplearningmethods
AT rqin benchmarkingtheextractionof3dgeometryfromuavimageswithdeeplearningmethods
AT czhang benchmarkingtheextractionof3dgeometryfromuavimageswithdeeplearningmethods