Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations

Jennifer Zimmermann,1 Melanie Sommer,1 Leticia Grize,2,3 Stefan Stubinger11Hightech Research Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 2Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; 3University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandAbstra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zimmermann J, Sommer M, Grize L, Stubinger S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-07-01
Series:Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/marginal-bone-loss-1-year-after-implantation-a-systematic-review-for-f-peer-reviewed-article-CCIDE
_version_ 1818009778508529664
author Zimmermann J
Sommer M
Grize L
Stubinger S
author_facet Zimmermann J
Sommer M
Grize L
Stubinger S
author_sort Zimmermann J
collection DOAJ
description Jennifer Zimmermann,1 Melanie Sommer,1 Leticia Grize,2,3 Stefan Stubinger11Hightech Research Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 2Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; 3University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandAbstract: This systematic review analyses the difference of the mean marginal bone loss (MBL) 1 year after implantation depending on the fixation of the restoration. 889 publications on controlled clinical trials were identified, and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 22 studies were selected. Related to fixed restorations, the lowest MBL was 0.05±0.67 mm and the highest 1.37±0.5 mm. The MBL for removable restorations ranged from 0.13±0.35 mm to 1.03±0.65 mm. Three studies analyzed the MBL around implants of overdentures in the lower jaw. The estimate for this restoration type was 0.476 mm (95% CI: −0.305 to 1.258). 19 randomized controlled studies dealt with restorations which were fixed to the implants. The estimate for the mean MBL was 0.459 mm (95% CI: 0.325–0.593). There was a decrease in 1-year implant survival with an increase of 1 mm MBL (−0.083%; 95% CI: −0.179 to 0.0123; p=0.083) in fixed restorations. The difference in MBL between fixed and removable restorations was 0.363 mm (95% CI: −0.319 to 1.044; p=0.279). This systematic review indicates that implants with fixed and with removable restorations lead to comparable MBL.Keywords: dental implants, marginal bone loss, fix and removable restorations, systematic review
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:47:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fc6ee984f28b40199278d759bc504fce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-1357
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:47:14Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-fc6ee984f28b40199278d759bc504fce2022-12-22T02:09:16ZengDove Medical PressClinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry1179-13572019-07-01Volume 1119521847160Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorationsZimmermann JSommer MGrize LStubinger SJennifer Zimmermann,1 Melanie Sommer,1 Leticia Grize,2,3 Stefan Stubinger11Hightech Research Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 2Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; 3University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandAbstract: This systematic review analyses the difference of the mean marginal bone loss (MBL) 1 year after implantation depending on the fixation of the restoration. 889 publications on controlled clinical trials were identified, and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 22 studies were selected. Related to fixed restorations, the lowest MBL was 0.05±0.67 mm and the highest 1.37±0.5 mm. The MBL for removable restorations ranged from 0.13±0.35 mm to 1.03±0.65 mm. Three studies analyzed the MBL around implants of overdentures in the lower jaw. The estimate for this restoration type was 0.476 mm (95% CI: −0.305 to 1.258). 19 randomized controlled studies dealt with restorations which were fixed to the implants. The estimate for the mean MBL was 0.459 mm (95% CI: 0.325–0.593). There was a decrease in 1-year implant survival with an increase of 1 mm MBL (−0.083%; 95% CI: −0.179 to 0.0123; p=0.083) in fixed restorations. The difference in MBL between fixed and removable restorations was 0.363 mm (95% CI: −0.319 to 1.044; p=0.279). This systematic review indicates that implants with fixed and with removable restorations lead to comparable MBL.Keywords: dental implants, marginal bone loss, fix and removable restorations, systematic reviewhttps://www.dovepress.com/marginal-bone-loss-1-year-after-implantation-a-systematic-review-for-f-peer-reviewed-article-CCIDEdental implantsmarginal bone lossfix and removable restorationssystematic review
spellingShingle Zimmermann J
Sommer M
Grize L
Stubinger S
Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
dental implants
marginal bone loss
fix and removable restorations
systematic review
title Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations
title_full Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations
title_fullStr Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations
title_full_unstemmed Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations
title_short Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations
title_sort marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations
topic dental implants
marginal bone loss
fix and removable restorations
systematic review
url https://www.dovepress.com/marginal-bone-loss-1-year-after-implantation-a-systematic-review-for-f-peer-reviewed-article-CCIDE
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermannj marginalboneloss1yearafterimplantationasystematicreviewforfixedandremovablerestorations
AT sommerm marginalboneloss1yearafterimplantationasystematicreviewforfixedandremovablerestorations
AT grizel marginalboneloss1yearafterimplantationasystematicreviewforfixedandremovablerestorations
AT stubingers marginalboneloss1yearafterimplantationasystematicreviewforfixedandremovablerestorations