The Second EWGRD Round Robin: Inter Comparison of Gamma Spectrometry Measurements on Activation Dosimeters
Following an initial Round Robin inter-comparison of gamma spectrometry measurements reported in 2014, this paper presents results from the first part of a second Round Robin inter-comparison commissioned by the European Working Group on Reactor Dosimetry in 2018. Measurements were performed by thir...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2023-01-01
|
Series: | EPJ Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2023/04/epjconf_isrd2023_05001.pdf |
_version_ | 1811157449520971776 |
---|---|
author | Thornton Dean Watson James Carcreff Hubert Domergue Christophe Fernandes Ana Frajtag Pavel Haroková Pavlína Kis Daniel Klupák Vít Kochkin Vyacheslav Lépy MarieChristine Mitev Mladen Prokopowicz Rafał Radulović Vladimir Straathof Ben Wagemans Jan Zsolnay Eva |
author_facet | Thornton Dean Watson James Carcreff Hubert Domergue Christophe Fernandes Ana Frajtag Pavel Haroková Pavlína Kis Daniel Klupák Vít Kochkin Vyacheslav Lépy MarieChristine Mitev Mladen Prokopowicz Rafał Radulović Vladimir Straathof Ben Wagemans Jan Zsolnay Eva |
author_sort | Thornton Dean |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Following an initial Round Robin inter-comparison of gamma spectrometry measurements reported in 2014, this paper presents results from the first part of a second Round Robin inter-comparison commissioned by the European Working Group on Reactor Dosimetry in 2018. Measurements were performed by thirteen European organisations on a set of irradiated neutron activation detectors representative of those commonly used by the Reactor Dosimetry community to measure neutron fluence using gamma spectrometry methods. The radionuclides measured were 110mAg, 58Co, 60Co, 54Mn, and 46Sc. The purpose of the exercise was to demonstrate the level of consistency between participating organisations in blind tests of measurements. The samples used were disks of iron, nickel, titanium, and two standard alloys of aluminium, one of 1% cobalt and the other 1% silver. They were irradiated in the MARIA reactor operated by National Centre for Nuclear Research, Poland. Participants provided their results to an independent referee who collated and compared the data. The results are presented in an anonymised form together with discussion and conclusions which may be drawn from the exercise. Good agreement was obtained with standard deviations for individual measurements between 2.0% (54Mn) and 5.6% (60Co). Overall, the results obtained from the latter Round Robin show less consistency than those from the first Round Robin, which is attributed to the participation of a wider pool of organisations. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:07:48Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fc7939fad01a467489f9f0b54c0c974d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2100-014X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:07:48Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | EPJ Web of Conferences |
spelling | doaj.art-fc7939fad01a467489f9f0b54c0c974d2023-03-09T12:03:05ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2023-01-012780500110.1051/epjconf/202327805001epjconf_isrd2023_05001The Second EWGRD Round Robin: Inter Comparison of Gamma Spectrometry Measurements on Activation DosimetersThornton Dean0Watson James1Carcreff Hubert2Domergue Christophe3Fernandes Ana4Frajtag Pavel5Haroková Pavlína6Kis Daniel7Klupák Vít8Kochkin Vyacheslav9Lépy MarieChristine10Mitev Mladen11Prokopowicz Rafał12Radulović Vladimir13Straathof Ben14Wagemans Jan15Zsolnay Eva16Jacobs EngineeringJacobs EngineeringCEA, Service d’études des réacteurs et de mathématiques appliquées, Université Paris-SaclayCEA, DES, IRESNE, DER, CadaracheInstituto Superior Técnico, Universidade deÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneŠkoda JSBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsResearch Centre ŘežKurchatov InstituteCEA, Laboratoire National Henri BecquerelInstitute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy of the Bulgarian Academy of SciencesNational Centre for Nuclear ResearchJožef Stefan InstituteNRGSCK-CENBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsFollowing an initial Round Robin inter-comparison of gamma spectrometry measurements reported in 2014, this paper presents results from the first part of a second Round Robin inter-comparison commissioned by the European Working Group on Reactor Dosimetry in 2018. Measurements were performed by thirteen European organisations on a set of irradiated neutron activation detectors representative of those commonly used by the Reactor Dosimetry community to measure neutron fluence using gamma spectrometry methods. The radionuclides measured were 110mAg, 58Co, 60Co, 54Mn, and 46Sc. The purpose of the exercise was to demonstrate the level of consistency between participating organisations in blind tests of measurements. The samples used were disks of iron, nickel, titanium, and two standard alloys of aluminium, one of 1% cobalt and the other 1% silver. They were irradiated in the MARIA reactor operated by National Centre for Nuclear Research, Poland. Participants provided their results to an independent referee who collated and compared the data. The results are presented in an anonymised form together with discussion and conclusions which may be drawn from the exercise. Good agreement was obtained with standard deviations for individual measurements between 2.0% (54Mn) and 5.6% (60Co). Overall, the results obtained from the latter Round Robin show less consistency than those from the first Round Robin, which is attributed to the participation of a wider pool of organisations.https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2023/04/epjconf_isrd2023_05001.pdf |
spellingShingle | Thornton Dean Watson James Carcreff Hubert Domergue Christophe Fernandes Ana Frajtag Pavel Haroková Pavlína Kis Daniel Klupák Vít Kochkin Vyacheslav Lépy MarieChristine Mitev Mladen Prokopowicz Rafał Radulović Vladimir Straathof Ben Wagemans Jan Zsolnay Eva The Second EWGRD Round Robin: Inter Comparison of Gamma Spectrometry Measurements on Activation Dosimeters EPJ Web of Conferences |
title | The Second EWGRD Round Robin: Inter Comparison of Gamma Spectrometry Measurements on Activation Dosimeters |
title_full | The Second EWGRD Round Robin: Inter Comparison of Gamma Spectrometry Measurements on Activation Dosimeters |
title_fullStr | The Second EWGRD Round Robin: Inter Comparison of Gamma Spectrometry Measurements on Activation Dosimeters |
title_full_unstemmed | The Second EWGRD Round Robin: Inter Comparison of Gamma Spectrometry Measurements on Activation Dosimeters |
title_short | The Second EWGRD Round Robin: Inter Comparison of Gamma Spectrometry Measurements on Activation Dosimeters |
title_sort | second ewgrd round robin inter comparison of gamma spectrometry measurements on activation dosimeters |
url | https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2023/04/epjconf_isrd2023_05001.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thorntondean thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT watsonjames thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT carcreffhubert thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT domerguechristophe thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT fernandesana thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT frajtagpavel thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT harokovapavlina thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT kisdaniel thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT klupakvit thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT kochkinvyacheslav thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT lepymariechristine thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT mitevmladen thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT prokopowiczrafał thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT radulovicvladimir thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT straathofben thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT wagemansjan thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT zsolnayeva thesecondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT thorntondean secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT watsonjames secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT carcreffhubert secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT domerguechristophe secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT fernandesana secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT frajtagpavel secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT harokovapavlina secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT kisdaniel secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT klupakvit secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT kochkinvyacheslav secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT lepymariechristine secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT mitevmladen secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT prokopowiczrafał secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT radulovicvladimir secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT straathofben secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT wagemansjan secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters AT zsolnayeva secondewgrdroundrobinintercomparisonofgammaspectrometrymeasurementsonactivationdosimeters |