Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage
Introduction Prevalence of pulmonary mycosis is increasing because of increase in the number of susceptible people, increasing awareness toward these infections, and improved methods of laboratory diagnosis. Inflammation of airway and microbiology of various respiratory infections can be studied usi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2021;volume=70;issue=2;spage=249;epage=253;aulast= |
_version_ | 1818898176020578304 |
---|---|
author | Rajesh Gupta Puneet Singla Nidhi Goel Anupama Gupta Pardeep Singh Raghav Gupta |
author_facet | Rajesh Gupta Puneet Singla Nidhi Goel Anupama Gupta Pardeep Singh Raghav Gupta |
author_sort | Rajesh Gupta |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction Prevalence of pulmonary mycosis is increasing because of increase in the number of susceptible people, increasing awareness toward these infections, and improved methods of laboratory diagnosis. Inflammation of airway and microbiology of various respiratory infections can be studied using sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The advantage of sputum examination is that it is a noninvasive procedure as compared with BAL.
Objective To explore the pulmonary mycosis and compare the yield of induced sputum and BAL for detecting pulmonary mycosis.
Patients and methods The present study was conducted on 98 patients of all age groups and sex who underwent bronchoscopy in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, in association with the Department of Microbiology. Sputum/induced sputum and BAL were collected in sterile vials and sent to the microbiology for examination for fungal species. In microbiology, sputum/BAL samples were subjected to direct microscopy and cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar. Culture was observed daily until 21 days for any fungal growth.
Discussion Of 98 patients, 60 were detected with fungal infection via sputum, whereas 64 of 98 patients were detected positive for fungal infection via BAL. Yield of sputum compared with the BAL for diagnosis of fungal infection showed sensitivity of 85.93%, specificity of 85.29%, positive predictive value of 91.66%, negative predictive value of 76.31%, and accuracy of 85.71%.
Conclusion Results were slightly better with BAL, but the difference was not much significant. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T19:27:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fc7af1940749457ba68173c8134c44e5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0422-7638 2090-9950 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T19:27:54Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis |
spelling | doaj.art-fc7af1940749457ba68173c8134c44e52022-12-21T20:08:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEgyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis0422-76382090-99502021-01-0170224925310.4103/ejcdt.ejcdt_28_20Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavageRajesh GuptaPuneet SinglaNidhi GoelAnupama GuptaPardeep SinghRaghav GuptaIntroduction Prevalence of pulmonary mycosis is increasing because of increase in the number of susceptible people, increasing awareness toward these infections, and improved methods of laboratory diagnosis. Inflammation of airway and microbiology of various respiratory infections can be studied using sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The advantage of sputum examination is that it is a noninvasive procedure as compared with BAL. Objective To explore the pulmonary mycosis and compare the yield of induced sputum and BAL for detecting pulmonary mycosis. Patients and methods The present study was conducted on 98 patients of all age groups and sex who underwent bronchoscopy in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, in association with the Department of Microbiology. Sputum/induced sputum and BAL were collected in sterile vials and sent to the microbiology for examination for fungal species. In microbiology, sputum/BAL samples were subjected to direct microscopy and cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar. Culture was observed daily until 21 days for any fungal growth. Discussion Of 98 patients, 60 were detected with fungal infection via sputum, whereas 64 of 98 patients were detected positive for fungal infection via BAL. Yield of sputum compared with the BAL for diagnosis of fungal infection showed sensitivity of 85.93%, specificity of 85.29%, positive predictive value of 91.66%, negative predictive value of 76.31%, and accuracy of 85.71%. Conclusion Results were slightly better with BAL, but the difference was not much significant.http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2021;volume=70;issue=2;spage=249;epage=253;aulast=bronchoalveolar lavagepulmonary mycosissputum |
spellingShingle | Rajesh Gupta Puneet Singla Nidhi Goel Anupama Gupta Pardeep Singh Raghav Gupta Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis bronchoalveolar lavage pulmonary mycosis sputum |
title | Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage |
title_full | Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage |
title_fullStr | Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage |
title_short | Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage |
title_sort | screening for pulmonary mycosis sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage |
topic | bronchoalveolar lavage pulmonary mycosis sputum |
url | http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2021;volume=70;issue=2;spage=249;epage=253;aulast= |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajeshgupta screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage AT puneetsingla screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage AT nidhigoel screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage AT anupamagupta screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage AT pardeepsingh screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage AT raghavgupta screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage |