Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage

Introduction Prevalence of pulmonary mycosis is increasing because of increase in the number of susceptible people, increasing awareness toward these infections, and improved methods of laboratory diagnosis. Inflammation of airway and microbiology of various respiratory infections can be studied usi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajesh Gupta, Puneet Singla, Nidhi Goel, Anupama Gupta, Pardeep Singh, Raghav Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2021;volume=70;issue=2;spage=249;epage=253;aulast=
_version_ 1818898176020578304
author Rajesh Gupta
Puneet Singla
Nidhi Goel
Anupama Gupta
Pardeep Singh
Raghav Gupta
author_facet Rajesh Gupta
Puneet Singla
Nidhi Goel
Anupama Gupta
Pardeep Singh
Raghav Gupta
author_sort Rajesh Gupta
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Prevalence of pulmonary mycosis is increasing because of increase in the number of susceptible people, increasing awareness toward these infections, and improved methods of laboratory diagnosis. Inflammation of airway and microbiology of various respiratory infections can be studied using sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The advantage of sputum examination is that it is a noninvasive procedure as compared with BAL. Objective To explore the pulmonary mycosis and compare the yield of induced sputum and BAL for detecting pulmonary mycosis. Patients and methods The present study was conducted on 98 patients of all age groups and sex who underwent bronchoscopy in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, in association with the Department of Microbiology. Sputum/induced sputum and BAL were collected in sterile vials and sent to the microbiology for examination for fungal species. In microbiology, sputum/BAL samples were subjected to direct microscopy and cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar. Culture was observed daily until 21 days for any fungal growth. Discussion Of 98 patients, 60 were detected with fungal infection via sputum, whereas 64 of 98 patients were detected positive for fungal infection via BAL. Yield of sputum compared with the BAL for diagnosis of fungal infection showed sensitivity of 85.93%, specificity of 85.29%, positive predictive value of 91.66%, negative predictive value of 76.31%, and accuracy of 85.71%. Conclusion Results were slightly better with BAL, but the difference was not much significant.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:27:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fc7af1940749457ba68173c8134c44e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0422-7638
2090-9950
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:27:54Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
spelling doaj.art-fc7af1940749457ba68173c8134c44e52022-12-21T20:08:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEgyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis0422-76382090-99502021-01-0170224925310.4103/ejcdt.ejcdt_28_20Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavageRajesh GuptaPuneet SinglaNidhi GoelAnupama GuptaPardeep SinghRaghav GuptaIntroduction Prevalence of pulmonary mycosis is increasing because of increase in the number of susceptible people, increasing awareness toward these infections, and improved methods of laboratory diagnosis. Inflammation of airway and microbiology of various respiratory infections can be studied using sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The advantage of sputum examination is that it is a noninvasive procedure as compared with BAL. Objective To explore the pulmonary mycosis and compare the yield of induced sputum and BAL for detecting pulmonary mycosis. Patients and methods The present study was conducted on 98 patients of all age groups and sex who underwent bronchoscopy in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, in association with the Department of Microbiology. Sputum/induced sputum and BAL were collected in sterile vials and sent to the microbiology for examination for fungal species. In microbiology, sputum/BAL samples were subjected to direct microscopy and cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar. Culture was observed daily until 21 days for any fungal growth. Discussion Of 98 patients, 60 were detected with fungal infection via sputum, whereas 64 of 98 patients were detected positive for fungal infection via BAL. Yield of sputum compared with the BAL for diagnosis of fungal infection showed sensitivity of 85.93%, specificity of 85.29%, positive predictive value of 91.66%, negative predictive value of 76.31%, and accuracy of 85.71%. Conclusion Results were slightly better with BAL, but the difference was not much significant.http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2021;volume=70;issue=2;spage=249;epage=253;aulast=bronchoalveolar lavagepulmonary mycosissputum
spellingShingle Rajesh Gupta
Puneet Singla
Nidhi Goel
Anupama Gupta
Pardeep Singh
Raghav Gupta
Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage
Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
bronchoalveolar lavage
pulmonary mycosis
sputum
title Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage
title_full Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage
title_fullStr Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage
title_full_unstemmed Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage
title_short Screening for pulmonary mycosis: sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage
title_sort screening for pulmonary mycosis sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage
topic bronchoalveolar lavage
pulmonary mycosis
sputum
url http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2021;volume=70;issue=2;spage=249;epage=253;aulast=
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshgupta screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage
AT puneetsingla screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage
AT nidhigoel screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage
AT anupamagupta screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage
AT pardeepsingh screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage
AT raghavgupta screeningforpulmonarymycosissputumversusbronchoalveolarlavage