Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications.

OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to assess the methodological quality of economic evaluations included in Belgian reimbursement applications for Class 1 drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 19 reimbursement applications submitted during 2011 and Spring 2012, a descriptive analysis assessed the methodologica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven Simoens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3875546?pdf=render
_version_ 1828183758636843008
author Steven Simoens
author_facet Steven Simoens
author_sort Steven Simoens
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to assess the methodological quality of economic evaluations included in Belgian reimbursement applications for Class 1 drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 19 reimbursement applications submitted during 2011 and Spring 2012, a descriptive analysis assessed the methodological quality of the economic evaluation, evaluated the assessment of that economic evaluation by the Drug Reimbursement Committee and the response to that assessment by the company. Compliance with methodological guidelines issued by the Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Centre was assessed using a detailed checklist of 23 methodological items. The rate of compliance was calculated based on the number of economic evaluations for which the item was applicable. RESULTS: Economic evaluations tended to comply with guidelines regarding perspective, target population, subgroup analyses, comparator, use of comparative clinical data and final outcome measures, calculation of costs, incremental analysis, discounting and time horizon. However, more attention needs to be paid to the description of limitations of indirect comparisons, the choice of an appropriate analytic technique, the expression of unit costs in values for the current year, the estimation and valuation of outcomes, the presentation of results of sensitivity analyses, and testing the face validity of model inputs and outputs. Also, a large variation was observed in the scope and depth of the quality assessment by the Drug Reimbursement Committee. CONCLUSIONS: Although general guidelines exist, pharmaceutical companies and the Drug Reimbursement Committee would benefit from the existence of a more detailed checklist of methodological items that need to be reported in an economic evaluation.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:37:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fc82bbba66a64788956faaa9d937fe6d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:37:34Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-fc82bbba66a64788956faaa9d937fe6d2022-12-22T03:43:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8541110.1371/journal.pone.0085411Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications.Steven SimoensOBJECTIVES: This paper aims to assess the methodological quality of economic evaluations included in Belgian reimbursement applications for Class 1 drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 19 reimbursement applications submitted during 2011 and Spring 2012, a descriptive analysis assessed the methodological quality of the economic evaluation, evaluated the assessment of that economic evaluation by the Drug Reimbursement Committee and the response to that assessment by the company. Compliance with methodological guidelines issued by the Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Centre was assessed using a detailed checklist of 23 methodological items. The rate of compliance was calculated based on the number of economic evaluations for which the item was applicable. RESULTS: Economic evaluations tended to comply with guidelines regarding perspective, target population, subgroup analyses, comparator, use of comparative clinical data and final outcome measures, calculation of costs, incremental analysis, discounting and time horizon. However, more attention needs to be paid to the description of limitations of indirect comparisons, the choice of an appropriate analytic technique, the expression of unit costs in values for the current year, the estimation and valuation of outcomes, the presentation of results of sensitivity analyses, and testing the face validity of model inputs and outputs. Also, a large variation was observed in the scope and depth of the quality assessment by the Drug Reimbursement Committee. CONCLUSIONS: Although general guidelines exist, pharmaceutical companies and the Drug Reimbursement Committee would benefit from the existence of a more detailed checklist of methodological items that need to be reported in an economic evaluation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3875546?pdf=render
spellingShingle Steven Simoens
Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications.
PLoS ONE
title Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications.
title_full Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications.
title_fullStr Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications.
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications.
title_short Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications.
title_sort assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3875546?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensimoens assessmentofmethodologicalqualityofeconomicevaluationsinbelgiandrugreimbursementapplications