Religion, Animals, and Racialization: Articulating Islamophobia through Animal Ethics in The Netherlands

In 2008, the Dutch Party for the Animals submitted a proposal to ban religious slaughter without prior stunning. The proposal was widely supported in the Lower House but finally rejected in the Upper House in 2012, mainly on the grounds of religious freedom. Academia was keen to study the polemic, b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mariska Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/10/955
_version_ 1797470121648717824
author Mariska Jung
author_facet Mariska Jung
author_sort Mariska Jung
collection DOAJ
description In 2008, the Dutch Party for the Animals submitted a proposal to ban religious slaughter without prior stunning. The proposal was widely supported in the Lower House but finally rejected in the Upper House in 2012, mainly on the grounds of religious freedom. Academia was keen to study the polemic, but no research has attempted to study the controversy through a lens of racialization. This is remarkable, given the well-documented increase in Islamophobia and the political use of racism since (at least) the turn of the millennium in The Netherlands (and the geopolitical “West” at large). In this article, I demonstrate that a racializing dynamic is actually part and parcel of the Dutch controversy. I apply a reflexive thematic analysis to study archival material from the Dutch Parliamentarian debate and show that the dispute foremost references Islamic slaughter. Appeals to civilization, accusations of barbarism, dystopian warnings against Islamization, and invocations of Judeo-Christianity are discursive elements that feature in the debate and have racializing ramifications for Muslims. By unmasking this racializing dynamic, I offer a means to empirically explore the ways in which taxonomies of religion and race intersect with and through the politicization of animal ethics. When considering religious slaughter it is essential, I ultimately maintain, to observe the violence caused by socially constructed racial and species differences. Only if we hold both in serious regard do we have a chance to begin to imagine ourselves in relation to others differently and move towards more just futures—for humans and non-humans alike.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:33:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fc8fa1c2236f4bd29a80da705abd9cad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:33:13Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-fc8fa1c2236f4bd29a80da705abd9cad2023-11-24T02:17:13ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442022-10-01131095510.3390/rel13100955Religion, Animals, and Racialization: Articulating Islamophobia through Animal Ethics in The NetherlandsMariska Jung0Department of Political Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, BelgiumIn 2008, the Dutch Party for the Animals submitted a proposal to ban religious slaughter without prior stunning. The proposal was widely supported in the Lower House but finally rejected in the Upper House in 2012, mainly on the grounds of religious freedom. Academia was keen to study the polemic, but no research has attempted to study the controversy through a lens of racialization. This is remarkable, given the well-documented increase in Islamophobia and the political use of racism since (at least) the turn of the millennium in The Netherlands (and the geopolitical “West” at large). In this article, I demonstrate that a racializing dynamic is actually part and parcel of the Dutch controversy. I apply a reflexive thematic analysis to study archival material from the Dutch Parliamentarian debate and show that the dispute foremost references Islamic slaughter. Appeals to civilization, accusations of barbarism, dystopian warnings against Islamization, and invocations of Judeo-Christianity are discursive elements that feature in the debate and have racializing ramifications for Muslims. By unmasking this racializing dynamic, I offer a means to empirically explore the ways in which taxonomies of religion and race intersect with and through the politicization of animal ethics. When considering religious slaughter it is essential, I ultimately maintain, to observe the violence caused by socially constructed racial and species differences. Only if we hold both in serious regard do we have a chance to begin to imagine ourselves in relation to others differently and move towards more just futures—for humans and non-humans alike.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/10/955ritual slaughterreligionanimal ethicsanimal advocacy politicsracializationIslamophobia
spellingShingle Mariska Jung
Religion, Animals, and Racialization: Articulating Islamophobia through Animal Ethics in The Netherlands
Religions
ritual slaughter
religion
animal ethics
animal advocacy politics
racialization
Islamophobia
title Religion, Animals, and Racialization: Articulating Islamophobia through Animal Ethics in The Netherlands
title_full Religion, Animals, and Racialization: Articulating Islamophobia through Animal Ethics in The Netherlands
title_fullStr Religion, Animals, and Racialization: Articulating Islamophobia through Animal Ethics in The Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Religion, Animals, and Racialization: Articulating Islamophobia through Animal Ethics in The Netherlands
title_short Religion, Animals, and Racialization: Articulating Islamophobia through Animal Ethics in The Netherlands
title_sort religion animals and racialization articulating islamophobia through animal ethics in the netherlands
topic ritual slaughter
religion
animal ethics
animal advocacy politics
racialization
Islamophobia
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/10/955
work_keys_str_mv AT mariskajung religionanimalsandracializationarticulatingislamophobiathroughanimalethicsinthenetherlands