Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don't Understand the Basics of Testing
Critics of testing students don’t understand the basics of testing. We let critics get away with bogus arguments that undermine the benefits of testing our students. Parents are misled into opposing a unique source of information about their schools—and their children. Worse, some opt their own ki...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nonpartisan Education Group
2019-02-01
|
| Series: | Nonpartisan Education Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v15n2.htm |
| _version_ | 1819095032865488896 |
|---|---|
| author | Glynn D. Ligon |
| author_facet | Glynn D. Ligon |
| author_sort | Glynn D. Ligon |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Critics of testing students don’t understand the basics of testing. We let critics get away with bogus arguments that undermine the benefits of testing our students. Parents are misled into opposing a unique source of information about their schools—and their children. Worse, some opt their own kids out of a valuable validator of their academic progress.
Critics of state tests are doing parents and educators a disservice. I trust the critics are merely misinformed; however, their attacks are often simply not based on fact. The news media validates the critics without benefit of having a basic background in testing. The state and district testing staffs have taken such politically cautious stances that they too seldom speak as advocates for the tests they are hired to administer and interpret. I venture to say the state and district test directors agree with me that the critics are off base most of time. I don’t know why we feel obligated to state our few agreements with critics’ tangential points before we begin destroying their numerous and overwhelming false premises.
I’m taken aback by four observations.
•Too few professionals are taking up for the tests.
•The critics are getting away with their misrepresentations and recasting of the issues.
•School accountability systems are being undermined.
•The states are trying to do too much with their state proficiency tests.
What’s needed in this debate is an unbiased, informed perspective. I no longer have a stake in this. I’m a former teacher, a former test director, and a former parent of public school students. I still have a Ph.D. in measurement and have read all the criticisms of testing. I constantly talk with parents who believe the criticisms of testing. I read the news articles about state testing and accountability.
So, here I go. I’m taking a “let’s get this debate centered on the issues and facts” position.
The attack on state tests is akin to Clark Kent being bullied on the playground as a kid and not being allowed to use his powers to defend himself. Somehow, it has become politically impolite to correct or challenge the test critics without first having to agree with one of their marginal points. The test pros seem to feel obligated to begin their response by agreeing with the test critics’ red herrings that make them appear to be legitimate defenders of our schools, students, and tax payer dollars. Sorry, critics. I’m not doing that. Not being a public employee, nor representing a testing company, I’ll say what should be said. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:36:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fc9c3db4fcbf46d5a8ede1af3ccb0c01 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2150-6477 2150-6477 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:36:51Z |
| publishDate | 2019-02-01 |
| publisher | Nonpartisan Education Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nonpartisan Education Review |
| spelling | doaj.art-fc9c3db4fcbf46d5a8ede1af3ccb0c012022-12-21T18:46:20ZengNonpartisan Education GroupNonpartisan Education Review2150-64772150-64772019-02-01151133Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don't Understand the Basics of TestingGlynn D. Ligon0ESP Solutions GroupCritics of testing students don’t understand the basics of testing. We let critics get away with bogus arguments that undermine the benefits of testing our students. Parents are misled into opposing a unique source of information about their schools—and their children. Worse, some opt their own kids out of a valuable validator of their academic progress. Critics of state tests are doing parents and educators a disservice. I trust the critics are merely misinformed; however, their attacks are often simply not based on fact. The news media validates the critics without benefit of having a basic background in testing. The state and district testing staffs have taken such politically cautious stances that they too seldom speak as advocates for the tests they are hired to administer and interpret. I venture to say the state and district test directors agree with me that the critics are off base most of time. I don’t know why we feel obligated to state our few agreements with critics’ tangential points before we begin destroying their numerous and overwhelming false premises. I’m taken aback by four observations. •Too few professionals are taking up for the tests. •The critics are getting away with their misrepresentations and recasting of the issues. •School accountability systems are being undermined. •The states are trying to do too much with their state proficiency tests. What’s needed in this debate is an unbiased, informed perspective. I no longer have a stake in this. I’m a former teacher, a former test director, and a former parent of public school students. I still have a Ph.D. in measurement and have read all the criticisms of testing. I constantly talk with parents who believe the criticisms of testing. I read the news articles about state testing and accountability. So, here I go. I’m taking a “let’s get this debate centered on the issues and facts” position. The attack on state tests is akin to Clark Kent being bullied on the playground as a kid and not being allowed to use his powers to defend himself. Somehow, it has become politically impolite to correct or challenge the test critics without first having to agree with one of their marginal points. The test pros seem to feel obligated to begin their response by agreeing with the test critics’ red herrings that make them appear to be legitimate defenders of our schools, students, and tax payer dollars. Sorry, critics. I’m not doing that. Not being a public employee, nor representing a testing company, I’ll say what should be said.https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v15n2.htmeducationstandardized testingtestingassessmentk-12 educationcriticism of testingtest developmentpsychometrics |
| spellingShingle | Glynn D. Ligon Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don't Understand the Basics of Testing Nonpartisan Education Review education standardized testing testing assessment k-12 education criticism of testing test development psychometrics |
| title | Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don't Understand the Basics of Testing |
| title_full | Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don't Understand the Basics of Testing |
| title_fullStr | Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don't Understand the Basics of Testing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don't Understand the Basics of Testing |
| title_short | Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don't Understand the Basics of Testing |
| title_sort | test critics fail the test critics of testing don t understand the basics of testing |
| topic | education standardized testing testing assessment k-12 education criticism of testing test development psychometrics |
| url | https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v15n2.htm |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT glynndligon testcriticsfailthetestcriticsoftestingdontunderstandthebasicsoftesting |