Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign
The paper argues against what I call the “Fregean interpretation” of Peirce’s distinction between the immediate and the dynamic object of a sign, according to which Peirce’s dynamic object is akin to Frege’s Bedeutung, while Peirce’s immediate object is akin to Frege’s Sinn. After having exposed the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Tartu Press
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | Sign Systems Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15891 |
| _version_ | 1818875600522182656 |
|---|---|
| author | Francesco Bellucci |
| author_facet | Francesco Bellucci |
| author_sort | Francesco Bellucci |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The paper argues against what I call the “Fregean interpretation” of Peirce’s distinction between the immediate and the dynamic object of a sign, according to which Peirce’s dynamic object is akin to Frege’s Bedeutung, while Peirce’s immediate object is akin to Frege’s Sinn. After having exposed the Fregean interpretation, I briefly reconstruct the genesis of Peirce’s notion of immediate object in his semiotic writings of the years 1904–1909 and defend the view that, according to Peirce, only propositions have immediate objects.
Includes: Comment by Helmut Pape (pp. 416–418). |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:29:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fcb551197a3a47abac1664eca97b8b2c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1406-4243 1736-7409 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:29:04Z |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Tartu Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sign Systems Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-fcb551197a3a47abac1664eca97b8b2c2022-12-21T20:19:28ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092015-12-0143410.12697/SSS.2015.43.4.02Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a signFrancesco Bellucci0Department of Philosophy, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 TallinnThe paper argues against what I call the “Fregean interpretation” of Peirce’s distinction between the immediate and the dynamic object of a sign, according to which Peirce’s dynamic object is akin to Frege’s Bedeutung, while Peirce’s immediate object is akin to Frege’s Sinn. After having exposed the Fregean interpretation, I briefly reconstruct the genesis of Peirce’s notion of immediate object in his semiotic writings of the years 1904–1909 and defend the view that, according to Peirce, only propositions have immediate objects. Includes: Comment by Helmut Pape (pp. 416–418).https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15891Charles PeirceGottlob Fregesensereferencemeaningimmediate object |
| spellingShingle | Francesco Bellucci Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign Sign Systems Studies Charles Peirce Gottlob Frege sense reference meaning immediate object |
| title | Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign |
| title_full | Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign |
| title_fullStr | Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign |
| title_full_unstemmed | Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign |
| title_short | Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign |
| title_sort | exploring peirce s speculative grammar the immediate object of a sign |
| topic | Charles Peirce Gottlob Frege sense reference meaning immediate object |
| url | https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15891 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francescobellucci exploringpeircesspeculativegrammartheimmediateobjectofasign |