Inventory of oncologists’ unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract Background Decision-making about palliative care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) consists of many different treatment-related decisions, and there generally is no best treatment option. Decision support systems (DSS), e.g., prognostic calculators, can aid oncologists’ decision-makin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ellen G. Engelhardt, Dóra Révész, Hans J. Tamminga, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Miriam Koopman, Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Veerle M. H. Coupé
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-018-0712-9
_version_ 1819178224881500160
author Ellen G. Engelhardt
Dóra Révész
Hans J. Tamminga
Cornelis J. A. Punt
Miriam Koopman
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Henrica C. W. de Vet
Veerle M. H. Coupé
author_facet Ellen G. Engelhardt
Dóra Révész
Hans J. Tamminga
Cornelis J. A. Punt
Miriam Koopman
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Henrica C. W. de Vet
Veerle M. H. Coupé
author_sort Ellen G. Engelhardt
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Decision-making about palliative care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) consists of many different treatment-related decisions, and there generally is no best treatment option. Decision support systems (DSS), e.g., prognostic calculators, can aid oncologists’ decision-making. DSS that contain features tailored to the needs of oncologists are more likely to be implemented in clinical practice. Therefore, our aim is to inventory colorectal cancer specialists’ unmet decision support needs. Methods We asked oncologists from the Dutch colorectal cancer group (DCCG), to participate in an online inventory questionnaire on their unmet decision support needs. To get more in-depth insight in required features of the DSS they need, we also conducted semi-structured telephone interviews. Results Forty-one oncologists started the inventory questionnaire, and 27 of them completed all items. Of all respondents, 18 were surgeons (44%), 22 were medical oncologists (54%), and 28 (68%) had more than 10 years of experience treating mCRC. In both the inventory questionnaire and interviews, respondents expressed a need for an overarching DSS incorporating multiple treatment options, and presenting both the treatment benefits and harms. Respondents found it relevant for other outcomes, such as cost-effectiveness of treatment or quality of life, to be incorporated in DSS. There was also a wish for DSS incorporating an up-to-date “personalized” overview of the ongoing trials for which a specific patient is eligible. Conclusions Experienced oncologists indicate that their treatment advice is currently almost solely based on the available clinical guidelines. They experience a lack of good quality DSS to help them personalize their treatment advice. New tools integrating multiple treatment options and providing a broad range of clinically relevant outcomes are urgently needed to stimulate and safeguard more personalized treatment decision-making.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T21:39:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fcbddd26984d42c6b955d6e4409fdac1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6947
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T21:39:10Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-fcbddd26984d42c6b955d6e4409fdac12022-12-21T18:11:39ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472018-12-011811710.1186/s12911-018-0712-9Inventory of oncologists’ unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancerEllen G. Engelhardt0Dóra Révész1Hans J. Tamminga2Cornelis J. A. Punt3Miriam Koopman4Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen5Ewout W. Steyerberg6Henrica C. W. de Vet7Veerle M. H. Coupé8Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMCDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMCDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMCDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMCDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht and University UtrechtDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, and Palliative Care Expertise Centre, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteDepartment of Public Health, Centre for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands and Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMCDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMCAbstract Background Decision-making about palliative care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) consists of many different treatment-related decisions, and there generally is no best treatment option. Decision support systems (DSS), e.g., prognostic calculators, can aid oncologists’ decision-making. DSS that contain features tailored to the needs of oncologists are more likely to be implemented in clinical practice. Therefore, our aim is to inventory colorectal cancer specialists’ unmet decision support needs. Methods We asked oncologists from the Dutch colorectal cancer group (DCCG), to participate in an online inventory questionnaire on their unmet decision support needs. To get more in-depth insight in required features of the DSS they need, we also conducted semi-structured telephone interviews. Results Forty-one oncologists started the inventory questionnaire, and 27 of them completed all items. Of all respondents, 18 were surgeons (44%), 22 were medical oncologists (54%), and 28 (68%) had more than 10 years of experience treating mCRC. In both the inventory questionnaire and interviews, respondents expressed a need for an overarching DSS incorporating multiple treatment options, and presenting both the treatment benefits and harms. Respondents found it relevant for other outcomes, such as cost-effectiveness of treatment or quality of life, to be incorporated in DSS. There was also a wish for DSS incorporating an up-to-date “personalized” overview of the ongoing trials for which a specific patient is eligible. Conclusions Experienced oncologists indicate that their treatment advice is currently almost solely based on the available clinical guidelines. They experience a lack of good quality DSS to help them personalize their treatment advice. New tools integrating multiple treatment options and providing a broad range of clinically relevant outcomes are urgently needed to stimulate and safeguard more personalized treatment decision-making.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-018-0712-9Metastatic colorectal cancerDecision support toolsQuestionnaires
spellingShingle Ellen G. Engelhardt
Dóra Révész
Hans J. Tamminga
Cornelis J. A. Punt
Miriam Koopman
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Henrica C. W. de Vet
Veerle M. H. Coupé
Inventory of oncologists’ unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Metastatic colorectal cancer
Decision support tools
Questionnaires
title Inventory of oncologists’ unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full Inventory of oncologists’ unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Inventory of oncologists’ unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Inventory of oncologists’ unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short Inventory of oncologists’ unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort inventory of oncologists unmet needs for tools to support decision making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
topic Metastatic colorectal cancer
Decision support tools
Questionnaires
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-018-0712-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ellengengelhardt inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT dorarevesz inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT hansjtamminga inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT cornelisjapunt inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT miriamkoopman inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT bregjedonwuteakaphilipsen inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ewoutwsteyerberg inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT henricacwdevet inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT veerlemhcoupe inventoryofoncologistsunmetneedsfortoolstosupportdecisionmakingaboutpalliativetreatmentformetastaticcolorectalcancer