Efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm

Abstract In the Netherlands, free-range layer farms as opposed to indoor layer farms, are at greater risk with regard to the introduction of avian influenza viruses (AIVs). Wild waterfowl are the natural reservoir hosts of AIVs, and play a major role in their transmission to poultry by contaminating...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armin R. W. Elbers, José L. Gonzales
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92267-z
_version_ 1818844997669093376
author Armin R. W. Elbers
José L. Gonzales
author_facet Armin R. W. Elbers
José L. Gonzales
author_sort Armin R. W. Elbers
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In the Netherlands, free-range layer farms as opposed to indoor layer farms, are at greater risk with regard to the introduction of avian influenza viruses (AIVs). Wild waterfowl are the natural reservoir hosts of AIVs, and play a major role in their transmission to poultry by contaminating free-range layer areas. The laser as a wild bird repellent has been in use since the 1970s, in particular around airfields to reduce bird-strike. The efficacy of laser for reducing wild bird numbers in and around free-range poultry areas has however not been investigated. During the autumn–winter, wild bird visits to the free-range area of a layer farm was surveilled by video-camera for a month without laser, followed by a month with laser. The automated laser (Class-III B qualification) was operated in two separate areas (i) within the poultry free-range area that directly bordered the poultry barn between 5:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. when poultry were absent (free-range study area, size 1.5 ha), and (ii) in surrounding grass pastures between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The overall (all bird species combined) efficacy of the laser for reducing the rate of wild birds visiting the free-range study area was 98.2%, and for the Orders Anseriformes and Passeriformes, respectively, was 99.7% and 96.1%. With the laser in operation, the overall exposure time of the free-range area to wild bird visits, but specifically to the Order Anseriformes, was massively reduced. It can be concluded that the Class-III B laser is highly proficient at keeping wild birds, in particular waterfowl, away from the free-range area of layer farms situated along a winter migration flyway.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T05:22:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fcc5abe1a3af4b32a931c862fe7e26b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T05:22:39Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-fcc5abe1a3af4b32a931c862fe7e26b02022-12-21T20:34:28ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-0111111110.1038/s41598-021-92267-zEfficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farmArmin R. W. Elbers0José L. Gonzales1Department of Epidemiology, Bioinformatics and Animal Studies, Wageningen Bioveterinary ResearchDepartment of Epidemiology, Bioinformatics and Animal Studies, Wageningen Bioveterinary ResearchAbstract In the Netherlands, free-range layer farms as opposed to indoor layer farms, are at greater risk with regard to the introduction of avian influenza viruses (AIVs). Wild waterfowl are the natural reservoir hosts of AIVs, and play a major role in their transmission to poultry by contaminating free-range layer areas. The laser as a wild bird repellent has been in use since the 1970s, in particular around airfields to reduce bird-strike. The efficacy of laser for reducing wild bird numbers in and around free-range poultry areas has however not been investigated. During the autumn–winter, wild bird visits to the free-range area of a layer farm was surveilled by video-camera for a month without laser, followed by a month with laser. The automated laser (Class-III B qualification) was operated in two separate areas (i) within the poultry free-range area that directly bordered the poultry barn between 5:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. when poultry were absent (free-range study area, size 1.5 ha), and (ii) in surrounding grass pastures between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The overall (all bird species combined) efficacy of the laser for reducing the rate of wild birds visiting the free-range study area was 98.2%, and for the Orders Anseriformes and Passeriformes, respectively, was 99.7% and 96.1%. With the laser in operation, the overall exposure time of the free-range area to wild bird visits, but specifically to the Order Anseriformes, was massively reduced. It can be concluded that the Class-III B laser is highly proficient at keeping wild birds, in particular waterfowl, away from the free-range area of layer farms situated along a winter migration flyway.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92267-z
spellingShingle Armin R. W. Elbers
José L. Gonzales
Efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm
Scientific Reports
title Efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm
title_full Efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm
title_fullStr Efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm
title_short Efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm
title_sort efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92267-z
work_keys_str_mv AT arminrwelbers efficacyofanautomatedlaserforreducingwildbirdvisitstothefreerangeareaofapoultryfarm
AT joselgonzales efficacyofanautomatedlaserforreducingwildbirdvisitstothefreerangeareaofapoultryfarm