Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models
Torrential streams and fast runoff are characteristic of most Slovenian rivers and extensive damage is caused almost every year by rainstorms affecting different regions of Slovenia. Rainfall-runoff models which are tools for runoff calculation can be used for flood forecasting. In Slovenia, the lag...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2005-01-01
|
| Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| Online Access: | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/9/322/2005/hess-9-322-2005.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811283973579472896 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Kobold M. Kobold K. Sušelj |
| author_facet | M. Kobold M. Kobold K. Sušelj |
| author_sort | M. Kobold |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Torrential streams and fast runoff are characteristic of most Slovenian rivers and extensive damage is caused almost every year by rainstorms affecting different regions of Slovenia. Rainfall-runoff models which are tools for runoff calculation can be used for flood forecasting. In Slovenia, the lag time between rainfall and runoff is only a few hours and on-line data are used only for now-casting. Predicted precipitation is necessary in flood forecasting some days ahead. The ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) model gives general forecasts several days ahead while more detailed precipitation data with the ALADIN/SI model are available for two days ahead. Combining the weather forecasts with the information on catchment conditions and a hydrological forecasting model can give advance warning of potential flooding notwithstanding a certain degree of uncertainty in using precipitation forecasts based on meteorological models. Analysis of the sensitivity of the hydrological model to the rainfall error has shown that the deviation in runoff is much larger than the rainfall deviation. Therefore, verification of predicted precipitation for large precipitation events was performed with the ECMWF model. Measured precipitation data were interpolated on a regular grid and compared with the results from the ECMWF model. The deviation in predicted precipitation from interpolated measurements is shown with the model bias resulting from the inability of the model to predict the precipitation correctly and a bias for horizontal resolution of the model and natural variability of precipitation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T02:21:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fcc8cbdf73fc440b8455a40fd8fb3ae0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T02:21:38Z |
| publishDate | 2005-01-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-fcc8cbdf73fc440b8455a40fd8fb3ae02022-12-22T03:06:58ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382005-01-0194322332Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological modelsM. KoboldM. KoboldK. SušeljTorrential streams and fast runoff are characteristic of most Slovenian rivers and extensive damage is caused almost every year by rainstorms affecting different regions of Slovenia. Rainfall-runoff models which are tools for runoff calculation can be used for flood forecasting. In Slovenia, the lag time between rainfall and runoff is only a few hours and on-line data are used only for now-casting. Predicted precipitation is necessary in flood forecasting some days ahead. The ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) model gives general forecasts several days ahead while more detailed precipitation data with the ALADIN/SI model are available for two days ahead. Combining the weather forecasts with the information on catchment conditions and a hydrological forecasting model can give advance warning of potential flooding notwithstanding a certain degree of uncertainty in using precipitation forecasts based on meteorological models. Analysis of the sensitivity of the hydrological model to the rainfall error has shown that the deviation in runoff is much larger than the rainfall deviation. Therefore, verification of predicted precipitation for large precipitation events was performed with the ECMWF model. Measured precipitation data were interpolated on a regular grid and compared with the results from the ECMWF model. The deviation in predicted precipitation from interpolated measurements is shown with the model bias resulting from the inability of the model to predict the precipitation correctly and a bias for horizontal resolution of the model and natural variability of precipitation.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/9/322/2005/hess-9-322-2005.pdf |
| spellingShingle | M. Kobold M. Kobold K. Sušelj Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| title | Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models |
| title_full | Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models |
| title_fullStr | Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models |
| title_full_unstemmed | Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models |
| title_short | Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models |
| title_sort | precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models |
| url | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/9/322/2005/hess-9-322-2005.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mkobold precipitationforecastsandtheiruncertaintyasinputintohydrologicalmodels AT mkobold precipitationforecastsandtheiruncertaintyasinputintohydrologicalmodels AT ksuselj precipitationforecastsandtheiruncertaintyasinputintohydrologicalmodels |