A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory

The publication opportunities in science require knowing the existing gaps in the academic debate. In recent decades, scholars specializing in fuzzy theory and applied methodologies have experienced an unprecedented evolution of the field. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have shaped the way...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernando Castelló-Sirvent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/8/1322
_version_ 1797434466015117312
author Fernando Castelló-Sirvent
author_facet Fernando Castelló-Sirvent
author_sort Fernando Castelló-Sirvent
collection DOAJ
description The publication opportunities in science require knowing the existing gaps in the academic debate. In recent decades, scholars specializing in fuzzy theory and applied methodologies have experienced an unprecedented evolution of the field. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have shaped the way socio-technical transitions use fuzzy methodologies to solve environmental problems. This study conducts a systematic literature review of articles published in the Journal Citations Report on these specific fields. The Web of Science (Core Collection) was used and a database was assembled (<i>N</i> = 1956) that allowed the evaluation of the evolution of the research agenda and detecting high-impact publication opportunities. A model of analysis of successful strategies in academic influence is proposed. The model is tested with a configurational methodology through fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). The conditions used are: number of authors, underlying interest of the researchers, standardized citations per year, age of the articles and link of the research with sustainability. The results are solid and inform five paths that ensure the success of academic publications in high-impact journals. The robustness of the model allows its extrapolation to other fields of research. The contribution of this article allows knowledge of the academic conversation and its research opportunities. In addition, it clarifies the different paths that guarantee high impact research articles. This article offers important recommendations for academics and journal editors, allowing them to guide and advise academic production in the scholarly debate of the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:32:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fcd30a093384425bb214ad7a38ea04aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7390
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:32:38Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Mathematics
spelling doaj.art-fcd30a093384425bb214ad7a38ea04aa2023-12-01T21:12:18ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902022-04-01108132210.3390/math10081322A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets TheoryFernando Castelló-Sirvent0Department of Economics and Finance, ESIC Business & Marketing School, 46021 València, SpainThe publication opportunities in science require knowing the existing gaps in the academic debate. In recent decades, scholars specializing in fuzzy theory and applied methodologies have experienced an unprecedented evolution of the field. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have shaped the way socio-technical transitions use fuzzy methodologies to solve environmental problems. This study conducts a systematic literature review of articles published in the Journal Citations Report on these specific fields. The Web of Science (Core Collection) was used and a database was assembled (<i>N</i> = 1956) that allowed the evaluation of the evolution of the research agenda and detecting high-impact publication opportunities. A model of analysis of successful strategies in academic influence is proposed. The model is tested with a configurational methodology through fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). The conditions used are: number of authors, underlying interest of the researchers, standardized citations per year, age of the articles and link of the research with sustainability. The results are solid and inform five paths that ensure the success of academic publications in high-impact journals. The robustness of the model allows its extrapolation to other fields of research. The contribution of this article allows knowledge of the academic conversation and its research opportunities. In addition, it clarifies the different paths that guarantee high impact research articles. This article offers important recommendations for academics and journal editors, allowing them to guide and advise academic production in the scholarly debate of the future.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/8/1322fuzzy setfuzzy theoryfsQCAbibliometric analysisresearch agendaVOS viewer
spellingShingle Fernando Castelló-Sirvent
A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory
Mathematics
fuzzy set
fuzzy theory
fsQCA
bibliometric analysis
research agenda
VOS viewer
title A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory
title_full A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory
title_fullStr A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory
title_full_unstemmed A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory
title_short A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory
title_sort fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of publications on the fuzzy sets theory
topic fuzzy set
fuzzy theory
fsQCA
bibliometric analysis
research agenda
VOS viewer
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/8/1322
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandocastellosirvent afuzzysetqualitativecomparativeanalysisofpublicationsonthefuzzysetstheory
AT fernandocastellosirvent fuzzysetqualitativecomparativeanalysisofpublicationsonthefuzzysetstheory