Discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest pain

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term prognostic value provided by the exercise electrocardiographic (ECG) response to nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the evaluation of patients with chest pain, focusing on patients with a discrepancy between the two t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sergio Raposeiras-Roubin, Miguel Garrido-Pumar, Virginia Pubul-Nuñez, Carlos Peña-Gil, Sonia Argibay-Vázquez, Rosa María Agra-Bermejo, Emad Abu-Assi, Amparo Martínez-Monzonís, Marino Vega, Alvaro Ruibal-Morell, Jose Ramón González-Juanatey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-10-01
Series:Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870255113002217
_version_ 1818511435448188928
author Sergio Raposeiras-Roubin
Miguel Garrido-Pumar
Virginia Pubul-Nuñez
Carlos Peña-Gil
Sonia Argibay-Vázquez
Rosa María Agra-Bermejo
Emad Abu-Assi
Amparo Martínez-Monzonís
Marino Vega
Alvaro Ruibal-Morell
Jose Ramón González-Juanatey
author_facet Sergio Raposeiras-Roubin
Miguel Garrido-Pumar
Virginia Pubul-Nuñez
Carlos Peña-Gil
Sonia Argibay-Vázquez
Rosa María Agra-Bermejo
Emad Abu-Assi
Amparo Martínez-Monzonís
Marino Vega
Alvaro Ruibal-Morell
Jose Ramón González-Juanatey
author_sort Sergio Raposeiras-Roubin
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term prognostic value provided by the exercise electrocardiographic (ECG) response to nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the evaluation of patients with chest pain, focusing on patients with a discrepancy between the two tests. Methods: A total of 1460 consecutive patients (777 female; 62.6±11.4 years) undergoing exercise myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were included. The endpoint was the occurrence of acute coronary syndrome, heart failure or cardiac death during follow-up. Results: Ischemic ECG changes were observed during stress testing in 271 patients (18.5%) and 362 patients (24.7%) had positive (abnormal) exercise MPI results. There was a discrepancy between ECG and SPECT findings in 471 patients (32.2%). During the follow-up period (14.0-39.6 months), 224 patients (15.3%) presented cardiac events. The hazard ratios (HR) of ECG and MPI results to predict events were 1.506 (95% CI: 1.113-2.039) and 10.481 (95% CI: 7.799-14.080), respectively. In patients with negative MPI, the ECG response did not predict events (HR 1.214 [95% CI: 0.646-2.282]), the same as in patients with positive MPI (HR 1.203 [95% CI: 0.848-1.705]). Only in hypertensive patients with positive SPECT did the ECG show significant prognostic value (HR 1.937 [95% CI: 1.030-3.642]). In multivariate analysis, positive MPI proved an independent long-term prognostic factor (HR 10.536 [95% CI: 7.759-14.308]), but not ECG (HR 1.356 [95% CI: 0.994-1.850]). Conclusion: MPI results (normal vs. abnormal) had strong predictive value and discrepant ECG results had no significant additive prognostic value. Resumo: Objetivos: O objetivo do presente estudo foi determinar o valor prognóstico a longo prazo, fornecido pelo eletrocardiograma (ECG) em resposta ao esforço na cintigrafia de perfusão miocárdica (CPM) na avaliação de doentes com dor torácica, com ênfase para os grupos de doentes com discrepância entre os dois testes. Método: Foram incluídos 1460 doentes consecutivos (777 do sexo feminino; 62,6 ± 11,4 anos), submetidos a exercício na cintigrafia de perfusão miocárdica com SPECT. O endpoint foi a presença de síndrome coronária aguda, insuficiência cardíaca ou morte cardíaca durante o seguimento. Resultados: Duzentos e setenta e um doentes (18,5%) apresentaram alterações eletrocardiográficas de isquemia durante o teste de esforço e 362 doentes (24,7%) tinham resultados positivos (anormais) na CPM. A discrepância entre os resultados do ECG e CPM apareceu em 471 doentes (32,2%). Durante o período de seguimento (14,0-39,6 meses), 224 (15,3%) apresentaram eventos cardíacos. O hazard ratio (HR) para predizer eventos dos resultados do ECG e CPM foi de 1,506 (1,113-2,039) e 10,481 (7,799-14,080), respetivamente. No grupo de doentes com CPM negativo, o ECG não prediz eventos [HR 1,214 (0,646-2,282)],e o mesmo acontece no grupo de doentes com CPM positivo [HR 1,203 (0,848-1,705)]. Apenas em doentes hipertensos com CPM positivo, o ECG mostrou valor prognóstico significativo [HR 1,937 (1,030-3,642)]. Na análise multivariada, a CPM positiva foi um fator independente de prognóstico a longo prazo [HR 10,536 (7,759-14,308)], mas não o ECG [HR 1,356 (0,994-1,850)]. Conclusão: O resultado da CPM (normal versus anormal) teve um forte valor preditivo e o resultado discrepante no ECG não teve um valor prognóstico adicional significativo. Keywords: Electrocardiogram, Myocardial perfusion imaging, Stress test, Prognosis, Palavras-chave: Eletrocardiograma, Imagens de perfusão miocárdica, Prova de esforço, Prognóstico
first_indexed 2024-12-10T23:33:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fcdf04b5e7e14ae4a941f6e592e7286d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0870-2551
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T23:33:20Z
publishDate 2013-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
spelling doaj.art-fcdf04b5e7e14ae4a941f6e592e7286d2022-12-22T01:29:18ZengElsevierRevista Portuguesa de Cardiologia0870-25512013-10-013210761768Discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest painSergio Raposeiras-Roubin0Miguel Garrido-Pumar1Virginia Pubul-Nuñez2Carlos Peña-Gil3Sonia Argibay-Vázquez4Rosa María Agra-Bermejo5Emad Abu-Assi6Amparo Martínez-Monzonís7Marino Vega8Alvaro Ruibal-Morell9Jose Ramón González-Juanatey10Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Corresponding author.Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Meixoeiro, Vigo, SpainDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SpainObjectives: The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term prognostic value provided by the exercise electrocardiographic (ECG) response to nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the evaluation of patients with chest pain, focusing on patients with a discrepancy between the two tests. Methods: A total of 1460 consecutive patients (777 female; 62.6±11.4 years) undergoing exercise myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were included. The endpoint was the occurrence of acute coronary syndrome, heart failure or cardiac death during follow-up. Results: Ischemic ECG changes were observed during stress testing in 271 patients (18.5%) and 362 patients (24.7%) had positive (abnormal) exercise MPI results. There was a discrepancy between ECG and SPECT findings in 471 patients (32.2%). During the follow-up period (14.0-39.6 months), 224 patients (15.3%) presented cardiac events. The hazard ratios (HR) of ECG and MPI results to predict events were 1.506 (95% CI: 1.113-2.039) and 10.481 (95% CI: 7.799-14.080), respectively. In patients with negative MPI, the ECG response did not predict events (HR 1.214 [95% CI: 0.646-2.282]), the same as in patients with positive MPI (HR 1.203 [95% CI: 0.848-1.705]). Only in hypertensive patients with positive SPECT did the ECG show significant prognostic value (HR 1.937 [95% CI: 1.030-3.642]). In multivariate analysis, positive MPI proved an independent long-term prognostic factor (HR 10.536 [95% CI: 7.759-14.308]), but not ECG (HR 1.356 [95% CI: 0.994-1.850]). Conclusion: MPI results (normal vs. abnormal) had strong predictive value and discrepant ECG results had no significant additive prognostic value. Resumo: Objetivos: O objetivo do presente estudo foi determinar o valor prognóstico a longo prazo, fornecido pelo eletrocardiograma (ECG) em resposta ao esforço na cintigrafia de perfusão miocárdica (CPM) na avaliação de doentes com dor torácica, com ênfase para os grupos de doentes com discrepância entre os dois testes. Método: Foram incluídos 1460 doentes consecutivos (777 do sexo feminino; 62,6 ± 11,4 anos), submetidos a exercício na cintigrafia de perfusão miocárdica com SPECT. O endpoint foi a presença de síndrome coronária aguda, insuficiência cardíaca ou morte cardíaca durante o seguimento. Resultados: Duzentos e setenta e um doentes (18,5%) apresentaram alterações eletrocardiográficas de isquemia durante o teste de esforço e 362 doentes (24,7%) tinham resultados positivos (anormais) na CPM. A discrepância entre os resultados do ECG e CPM apareceu em 471 doentes (32,2%). Durante o período de seguimento (14,0-39,6 meses), 224 (15,3%) apresentaram eventos cardíacos. O hazard ratio (HR) para predizer eventos dos resultados do ECG e CPM foi de 1,506 (1,113-2,039) e 10,481 (7,799-14,080), respetivamente. No grupo de doentes com CPM negativo, o ECG não prediz eventos [HR 1,214 (0,646-2,282)],e o mesmo acontece no grupo de doentes com CPM positivo [HR 1,203 (0,848-1,705)]. Apenas em doentes hipertensos com CPM positivo, o ECG mostrou valor prognóstico significativo [HR 1,937 (1,030-3,642)]. Na análise multivariada, a CPM positiva foi um fator independente de prognóstico a longo prazo [HR 10,536 (7,759-14,308)], mas não o ECG [HR 1,356 (0,994-1,850)]. Conclusão: O resultado da CPM (normal versus anormal) teve um forte valor preditivo e o resultado discrepante no ECG não teve um valor prognóstico adicional significativo. Keywords: Electrocardiogram, Myocardial perfusion imaging, Stress test, Prognosis, Palavras-chave: Eletrocardiograma, Imagens de perfusão miocárdica, Prova de esforço, Prognósticohttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870255113002217
spellingShingle Sergio Raposeiras-Roubin
Miguel Garrido-Pumar
Virginia Pubul-Nuñez
Carlos Peña-Gil
Sonia Argibay-Vázquez
Rosa María Agra-Bermejo
Emad Abu-Assi
Amparo Martínez-Monzonís
Marino Vega
Alvaro Ruibal-Morell
Jose Ramón González-Juanatey
Discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest pain
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
title Discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest pain
title_full Discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest pain
title_fullStr Discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest pain
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest pain
title_short Discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest pain
title_sort discrepancy between stress electrocardiographic changes and nuclear myocardial perfusion defects in the prognostic assessment of patients with chest pain
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870255113002217
work_keys_str_mv AT sergioraposeirasroubin discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT miguelgarridopumar discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT virginiapubulnunez discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT carlospenagil discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT soniaargibayvazquez discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT rosamariaagrabermejo discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT emadabuassi discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT amparomartinezmonzonis discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT marinovega discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT alvaroruibalmorell discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain
AT joseramongonzalezjuanatey discrepancybetweenstresselectrocardiographicchangesandnuclearmyocardialperfusiondefectsintheprognosticassessmentofpatientswithchestpain