Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies are the most common study design types used to assess the treatment effects of medical interventions. To evaluate the agreement of effect estimates between bodies of evidence (BoE) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and...
Main Authors: | Nils Bröckelmann, Sara Balduzzi, Louisa Harms, Jessica Beyerbach, Maria Petropoulou, Charlotte Kubiak, Martin Wolkewitz, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Lukas Schwingshackl |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02369-2 |
Similar Items
-
An empirical evaluation of the impact scenario of pooling bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research
by: Nils Bröckelmann, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Empirical evidence of study design biases in nutrition randomised controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study
by: Julia Stadelmaier, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND COMPETITION POLICY. CASE STUDY: EU, ASEAN AND NAFTA
by: Fora Andreea-Florina
Published: (2014-07-01) -
Normative and subjective need for dental prosthesis: accuracy and agreement in a population based-study
by: Luiz Alexandre Chisini, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
The use of new technologies in Cohort studies
by: Carlos Antonio Bruno da Silva, et al.
Published: (2010-03-01)