Grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close-range UAV imagery – uncertainty in segmentation-based data

<p>Data on grain sizes of pebbles in gravel-bed rivers are of key importance for the understanding of river systems. To gather these data efficiently, low-cost UAV (uncrewed aerial vehicle) platforms have been used to collect images along rivers. Several methods to extract pebble size data fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Mair, A. H. Do Prado, P. Garefalakis, A. Lechmann, A. Whittaker, F. Schlunegger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-10-01
Series:Earth Surface Dynamics
Online Access:https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/10/953/2022/esurf-10-953-2022.pdf
_version_ 1811345033682485248
author D. Mair
A. H. Do Prado
P. Garefalakis
A. Lechmann
A. Whittaker
F. Schlunegger
author_facet D. Mair
A. H. Do Prado
P. Garefalakis
A. Lechmann
A. Whittaker
F. Schlunegger
author_sort D. Mair
collection DOAJ
description <p>Data on grain sizes of pebbles in gravel-bed rivers are of key importance for the understanding of river systems. To gather these data efficiently, low-cost UAV (uncrewed aerial vehicle) platforms have been used to collect images along rivers. Several methods to extract pebble size data from such UAV imagery have been proposed. Yet, despite the availability of information on the precision and accuracy of UAV surveys as well as knowledge of errors from image-based grain size measurements, open questions on how uncertainties influence the resulting grain size distributions still persist.</p> <p>Here we present the results of three close-range UAV surveys conducted along Swiss gravel-bed rivers with a consumer-grade UAV. We measure grain sizes on these images by segmenting grains, and we assess the dependency of the results and their uncertainties on the photogrammetric models. We employ a combined bootstrapping and Monte Carlo (MC) modeling approach to model percentile uncertainties while including uncertainty quantities from the photogrammetric model.</p> <p>Our results show that uncertainty in the grain size dataset is controlled by counting statistics, the selected processed image format, and the way the images are segmented. Therefore, our results highlight that grain size data are more precise and accurate, and largely independent of the quality of the photogrammetric model, if the data are extracted from single, undistorted nadir images in opposition to orthophoto mosaics. In addition, they reveal that environmental conditions (e.g., exposure to light), which control the quality of the photogrammetric model, also influence the detection of grains during image segmentation, which can lead to a higher uncertainty in the grain size dataset. Generally, these results indicate that even relatively imprecise and inaccurate UAV imagery can yield acceptable grain size data, under the conditions that the photogrammetric alignment was successful and that suitable image formats were selected (preferentially single, undistorted nadir images).</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T19:57:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fce7f96651fa482e81a7b8e4db9ad0d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-6311
2196-632X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T19:57:01Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Earth Surface Dynamics
spelling doaj.art-fce7f96651fa482e81a7b8e4db9ad0d32022-12-22T02:32:19ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2022-10-011095397310.5194/esurf-10-953-2022Grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close-range UAV imagery – uncertainty in segmentation-based dataD. Mair0A. H. Do Prado1P. Garefalakis2A. Lechmann3A. Whittaker4F. Schlunegger5Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1 + 3, 3012 Bern, SwitzerlandInstitute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1 + 3, 3012 Bern, SwitzerlandInstitute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1 + 3, 3012 Bern, SwitzerlandInstitute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1 + 3, 3012 Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, United KingdomInstitute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1 + 3, 3012 Bern, Switzerland<p>Data on grain sizes of pebbles in gravel-bed rivers are of key importance for the understanding of river systems. To gather these data efficiently, low-cost UAV (uncrewed aerial vehicle) platforms have been used to collect images along rivers. Several methods to extract pebble size data from such UAV imagery have been proposed. Yet, despite the availability of information on the precision and accuracy of UAV surveys as well as knowledge of errors from image-based grain size measurements, open questions on how uncertainties influence the resulting grain size distributions still persist.</p> <p>Here we present the results of three close-range UAV surveys conducted along Swiss gravel-bed rivers with a consumer-grade UAV. We measure grain sizes on these images by segmenting grains, and we assess the dependency of the results and their uncertainties on the photogrammetric models. We employ a combined bootstrapping and Monte Carlo (MC) modeling approach to model percentile uncertainties while including uncertainty quantities from the photogrammetric model.</p> <p>Our results show that uncertainty in the grain size dataset is controlled by counting statistics, the selected processed image format, and the way the images are segmented. Therefore, our results highlight that grain size data are more precise and accurate, and largely independent of the quality of the photogrammetric model, if the data are extracted from single, undistorted nadir images in opposition to orthophoto mosaics. In addition, they reveal that environmental conditions (e.g., exposure to light), which control the quality of the photogrammetric model, also influence the detection of grains during image segmentation, which can lead to a higher uncertainty in the grain size dataset. Generally, these results indicate that even relatively imprecise and inaccurate UAV imagery can yield acceptable grain size data, under the conditions that the photogrammetric alignment was successful and that suitable image formats were selected (preferentially single, undistorted nadir images).</p>https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/10/953/2022/esurf-10-953-2022.pdf
spellingShingle D. Mair
A. H. Do Prado
P. Garefalakis
A. Lechmann
A. Whittaker
F. Schlunegger
Grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close-range UAV imagery – uncertainty in segmentation-based data
Earth Surface Dynamics
title Grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close-range UAV imagery – uncertainty in segmentation-based data
title_full Grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close-range UAV imagery – uncertainty in segmentation-based data
title_fullStr Grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close-range UAV imagery – uncertainty in segmentation-based data
title_full_unstemmed Grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close-range UAV imagery – uncertainty in segmentation-based data
title_short Grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close-range UAV imagery – uncertainty in segmentation-based data
title_sort grain size of fluvial gravel bars from close range uav imagery uncertainty in segmentation based data
url https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/10/953/2022/esurf-10-953-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dmair grainsizeoffluvialgravelbarsfromcloserangeuavimageryuncertaintyinsegmentationbaseddata
AT ahdoprado grainsizeoffluvialgravelbarsfromcloserangeuavimageryuncertaintyinsegmentationbaseddata
AT pgarefalakis grainsizeoffluvialgravelbarsfromcloserangeuavimageryuncertaintyinsegmentationbaseddata
AT alechmann grainsizeoffluvialgravelbarsfromcloserangeuavimageryuncertaintyinsegmentationbaseddata
AT awhittaker grainsizeoffluvialgravelbarsfromcloserangeuavimageryuncertaintyinsegmentationbaseddata
AT fschlunegger grainsizeoffluvialgravelbarsfromcloserangeuavimageryuncertaintyinsegmentationbaseddata