Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads

Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads

This study presents the results of a campaign that estimated methane emissions at 268 gas production facilities in the Fayetteville shale gas play using onsite measurements (261 facilities) and two downwind methods – the dual tracer flux ratio method (Tracer Facility Estimate – TFE, 17 facilities) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Clay Samuel Bell, Timothy L. Vaughn, Daniel Zimmerle, Scott C. Herndon, Tara I. Yacovitch, Garvin A. Heath, Gabrielle Pétron, Rachel Edie, Robert A. Field, Shane M. Murphy, Anna M. Robertson, Jeffrey Soltis
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	BioOne 2017-12-01
Series:	Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
Subjects:	climate change Natural gas methane Emissions
Online Access:	https://www.elementascience.org/articles/266

Similar Items

Comparing facility-level methane emission rate estimates at natural gas gathering and boosting stations
by: Timothy L. Vaughn, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Gathering pipeline methane emissions in Fayetteville shale pipelines and scoping guidelines for future pipeline measurement campaigns
by: Daniel J. Zimmerle, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Natural gas facility methane emissions: measurements by tracer flux ratio in two US natural gas producing basins
by: Tara I. Yacovitch, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Evaluation of next generation emission measurement technologies under repeatable test protocols
by: Clay S. Bell, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Methane emissions in the Netherlands: The Groningen field
by: Tara I. Yacovitch, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

Characterizing methane emissions from orphaned coalbed methane wells in the powder river basin
by: J Nivitanont, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites in Alberta, Canada
by: Daniel Zavala-Araiza, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Methane Quantification Performance of the Quantitative Optical Gas Imaging (QOGI) System Using Single-Blind Controlled Release Assessment
by: Chiemezie Ilonze, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)

Conversion of methane to useful chemicals /
by: 205418 Abdul Rahman Songip

Thermodynamic properties of methane /
by: Sychev, V. V. (Viacheslav Vladimirovich), 1933-
Published: (1987)

Point Sensor Networks Struggle to Detect and Quantify Short Controlled Releases at Oil and Gas Sites
by: Rachel Elizabeth Day, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Methane /
by: International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Analytical Chemistry Division. Commission on Solubility Data, et al.
Published: (1987)

Methane digester /
by: 272271 Swa, C. H.
Published: (1977)

Methane in the environment : occurrence, uses and production /
by: Basile, Angelo (Angelo Bruno) editor
Published: ([201)

Single-blind inter-comparison of methane detection technologies – results from the Stanford/EDF Mobile Monitoring Challenge
by: Arvind P. Ravikumar, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Methane and its derivatives /
by: 420820 Sunggyu, Lee
Published: (1997)

The formation of methane by bacteria
by: 320047 Taylor, G. T.

Temperature responses from methane mitigation approaches vary widely due to non-methane impacts
by: Sam Abernethy, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Better assessment of Global methane.
by: Arthur, Rasjid, author
Published: (1997)

P-V-T relations for methane /
by: Douslin, Donald R.

Coalbed methane /
by: Society of Petroleum Engineers (United States)
Published: (1992)

Atmospheric methane underestimated in future climate projections
by: Thomas Kleinen, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Living emission abolish filters (LEAFs) for methane mitigation: design and operation
by: Richard Hamilton, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Practical building of methane power plants from rural energy independence/
by: 236007 Fry, L. John
Published: (1974)

Potential Underestimate in Reported Bottom-up Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in the Delaware Basin
by: Stuart N. Riddick, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Verifying Methane Inventories and Trends With Atmospheric Methane Data
by: John R. Worden, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Addressing Low-Cost Methane Sensor Calibration Shortcomings with Machine Learning
by: Elijah Kiplimo, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)

Tetrakis(dimethoxyboryl)methane
by: Sumeng Liu, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01)

Methane Seeps and Independent Methane Plumes in the South China Sea Offshore Taiwan
by: Susan Mau, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Uncertainty Quantification of Methods Used to Measure Methane Emissions of 1 g CH<sub>4</sub> h<sup>−1</sup>
by: Stuart N. Riddick, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)

Revisiting the Global Methane Cycle Through Expert Opinion
by: Judith A. Rosentreter, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)

Thermophilic methane production from cattle waste /
by: 248941 Varel, V. H., et al.

Methane digester with solar water heating system
by: 272928 Wong, Foon Meng
Published: (1978)

Genetic Analysis of Methane Emission Traits in Holstein Dairy Cattle
by: Stephanie Kamalanathan, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Why methane matters
by: Fiona M. O’Connor, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01)

Research progress on methane conversion coupling photocatalysis and thermocatalysis
by: Zengzan Zhu, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Comparison of Methane Control Methods in Polish and Vietnamese Coal Mines
by: Borowski Marek, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Estimating Total Methane Emissions from the Denver-Julesburg Basin Using Bottom-Up Approaches
by: Stuart N. Riddick, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)

Optimization of oxidative coupling of methane using experimental design /
by: Zaki Yamani Zakaria, 1976-
Published: (2003)

The Mechanism of Sodium Sulfate Coupled with Anaerobic Methane Oxidation Mitigating Methane Production in Beef Cattle
by: Xiaowen Zhu, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01)