A comparative Isothermal and Kinetic Study of the Adsorption of Lead (II) from Solution by Activated Carbon and Bentonite

This work is aiming to study and compare the removal of lead (II) from simulated wastewater by activated carbon and bentonite as adsorbents with particle size of 0.32-0.5 mm. A mathematical model was applied to describe the mass transfer kinetic. The batch experiments were carried out to determine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ziad Tark Abd Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Baghdad 2015-07-01
Series:Journal of Engineering
Online Access:https://www.jcoeng.edu.iq/index.php/main/article/view/392/339
_version_ 1797721018150682624
author Ziad Tark Abd Ali
author_facet Ziad Tark Abd Ali
author_sort Ziad Tark Abd Ali
collection DOAJ
description This work is aiming to study and compare the removal of lead (II) from simulated wastewater by activated carbon and bentonite as adsorbents with particle size of 0.32-0.5 mm. A mathematical model was applied to describe the mass transfer kinetic. The batch experiments were carried out to determine the adsorption isotherm constants for each adsorbent, and five isotherm models were tested to choose the best fit model for the experimental data. The pore, surface diffusion coefficients and mass transfer coefficient were found by fitting the experimental data to a theoretical model. Partial differential equations were used to describe the adsorption in the bulk and solid phases. These equations were simplified and then solved using a technique with finite elements and orthogonal collection method for the bulk fluid and intraparticle phases, respectively. The results obtained from this work show that the equilibrium adsorption isotherms are favorable, and fitted well using the Freundlich model for activated carbon and bentonite. The activated carbon has a high value of pore diffusion coefficient, Dp, while bentonite has a high value of surface diffusion coefficient, Ds. This indicates that the pore diffusion controls the adsorption process for activated carbon, and the surface diffusion controls the adsorption process for bentonite. The activated carbon was more efficient than bentonite in removing of lead (II) from simulated industrial wastewater.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:27:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fcf37143e9144c15bd999c666d0ca2b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4073
2520-3339
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:27:51Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher University of Baghdad
record_format Article
series Journal of Engineering
spelling doaj.art-fcf37143e9144c15bd999c666d0ca2b62023-09-02T14:06:54ZengUniversity of BaghdadJournal of Engineering1726-40732520-33392015-07-012174558A comparative Isothermal and Kinetic Study of the Adsorption of Lead (II) from Solution by Activated Carbon and BentoniteZiad Tark Abd AliThis work is aiming to study and compare the removal of lead (II) from simulated wastewater by activated carbon and bentonite as adsorbents with particle size of 0.32-0.5 mm. A mathematical model was applied to describe the mass transfer kinetic. The batch experiments were carried out to determine the adsorption isotherm constants for each adsorbent, and five isotherm models were tested to choose the best fit model for the experimental data. The pore, surface diffusion coefficients and mass transfer coefficient were found by fitting the experimental data to a theoretical model. Partial differential equations were used to describe the adsorption in the bulk and solid phases. These equations were simplified and then solved using a technique with finite elements and orthogonal collection method for the bulk fluid and intraparticle phases, respectively. The results obtained from this work show that the equilibrium adsorption isotherms are favorable, and fitted well using the Freundlich model for activated carbon and bentonite. The activated carbon has a high value of pore diffusion coefficient, Dp, while bentonite has a high value of surface diffusion coefficient, Ds. This indicates that the pore diffusion controls the adsorption process for activated carbon, and the surface diffusion controls the adsorption process for bentonite. The activated carbon was more efficient than bentonite in removing of lead (II) from simulated industrial wastewater.https://www.jcoeng.edu.iq/index.php/main/article/view/392/339
spellingShingle Ziad Tark Abd Ali
A comparative Isothermal and Kinetic Study of the Adsorption of Lead (II) from Solution by Activated Carbon and Bentonite
Journal of Engineering
title A comparative Isothermal and Kinetic Study of the Adsorption of Lead (II) from Solution by Activated Carbon and Bentonite
title_full A comparative Isothermal and Kinetic Study of the Adsorption of Lead (II) from Solution by Activated Carbon and Bentonite
title_fullStr A comparative Isothermal and Kinetic Study of the Adsorption of Lead (II) from Solution by Activated Carbon and Bentonite
title_full_unstemmed A comparative Isothermal and Kinetic Study of the Adsorption of Lead (II) from Solution by Activated Carbon and Bentonite
title_short A comparative Isothermal and Kinetic Study of the Adsorption of Lead (II) from Solution by Activated Carbon and Bentonite
title_sort comparative isothermal and kinetic study of the adsorption of lead ii from solution by activated carbon and bentonite
url https://www.jcoeng.edu.iq/index.php/main/article/view/392/339
work_keys_str_mv AT ziadtarkabdali acomparativeisothermalandkineticstudyoftheadsorptionofleadiifromsolutionbyactivatedcarbonandbentonite
AT ziadtarkabdali comparativeisothermalandkineticstudyoftheadsorptionofleadiifromsolutionbyactivatedcarbonandbentonite