The ethical and moral dimensions of the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

The paper discusses the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia through two ethical perspectives: deontological or the ethics of duty and consequentialist or the ethics of consequences. The hypothetical starting point is that, if the aggression is based on moral principles, then t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pešić Zoran R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Defence of Serbia - Military Publishing House, Belgrade 2023-01-01
Series:Војно дело
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0042-8426/2023/0042-84262302059P.pdf
_version_ 1827796343838474240
author Pešić Zoran R.
author_facet Pešić Zoran R.
author_sort Pešić Zoran R.
collection DOAJ
description The paper discusses the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia through two ethical perspectives: deontological or the ethics of duty and consequentialist or the ethics of consequences. The hypothetical starting point is that, if the aggression is based on moral principles, then those principles should also characterize it, starting from intention, motive, goals, means to final result, and if this is not the case, the aggression cannot be justified from a moral point of view. The objective of the paper is to present the unsustainability, in an ethical and moral sense, of the "humanitarian" character of the intervention and reasons such as the prevention of humanitarian catastrophe and the protection of human rights. After the introductory part of the paper, the theoretical basis and analytical approach have been presented, in order to consider the moral sustainability of the reasons for the aggression and its moral character through a deontological and consequentialist ethical perspective. It has been concluded that the aggression does not fully meet the deontological and consequentialist criteria of moral rightness, that is, that interests are hidden behind moral reasons. Morality does not have a decisive role in international relations, but it is, along with international law, the only argument that small countries can invoke. The hypothetico-deductive, descriptive and analytical-synthetic methods have been used in the paper.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T19:05:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd1434f8ccd34575802dc07fe7bbefad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0042-8426
2683-5703
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T19:05:52Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Ministry of Defence of Serbia - Military Publishing House, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Војно дело
spelling doaj.art-fd1434f8ccd34575802dc07fe7bbefad2023-10-10T08:36:01ZengMinistry of Defence of Serbia - Military Publishing House, BelgradeВојно дело0042-84262683-57032023-01-01752597110.5937/vojdelo2302059P0042-84262302059PThe ethical and moral dimensions of the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of YugoslaviaPešić Zoran R.0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3549-6897Fakultet za poslovne studije i pravo, Beograd, SerbiaThe paper discusses the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia through two ethical perspectives: deontological or the ethics of duty and consequentialist or the ethics of consequences. The hypothetical starting point is that, if the aggression is based on moral principles, then those principles should also characterize it, starting from intention, motive, goals, means to final result, and if this is not the case, the aggression cannot be justified from a moral point of view. The objective of the paper is to present the unsustainability, in an ethical and moral sense, of the "humanitarian" character of the intervention and reasons such as the prevention of humanitarian catastrophe and the protection of human rights. After the introductory part of the paper, the theoretical basis and analytical approach have been presented, in order to consider the moral sustainability of the reasons for the aggression and its moral character through a deontological and consequentialist ethical perspective. It has been concluded that the aggression does not fully meet the deontological and consequentialist criteria of moral rightness, that is, that interests are hidden behind moral reasons. Morality does not have a decisive role in international relations, but it is, along with international law, the only argument that small countries can invoke. The hypothetico-deductive, descriptive and analytical-synthetic methods have been used in the paper.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0042-8426/2023/0042-84262302059P.pdfaggressionyugoslaviamoral perspectiveethics of dutyethics of consequences
spellingShingle Pešić Zoran R.
The ethical and moral dimensions of the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
Војно дело
aggression
yugoslavia
moral perspective
ethics of duty
ethics of consequences
title The ethical and moral dimensions of the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
title_full The ethical and moral dimensions of the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
title_fullStr The ethical and moral dimensions of the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
title_full_unstemmed The ethical and moral dimensions of the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
title_short The ethical and moral dimensions of the NATO aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
title_sort ethical and moral dimensions of the nato aggression against the federal republic of yugoslavia
topic aggression
yugoslavia
moral perspective
ethics of duty
ethics of consequences
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0042-8426/2023/0042-84262302059P.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pesiczoranr theethicalandmoraldimensionsofthenatoaggressionagainstthefederalrepublicofyugoslavia
AT pesiczoranr ethicalandmoraldimensionsofthenatoaggressionagainstthefederalrepublicofyugoslavia