KETERBATASAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN

Default Paragraph Font;hps;Consumer Dispute Settlement Board which is expected to be able to provide a fair settlement to the disputed parties turns out in practice causing confusion for those involved in the implementation process especially when there is an inclusion of the judiciary role in inves...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tami Rusli
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: University of Diponegoro, Faculty of Law 2014-04-01
Series:Masalah-Masalah Hukum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/9044
_version_ 1818417409940258816
author Tami Rusli
author_facet Tami Rusli
author_sort Tami Rusli
collection DOAJ
description Default Paragraph Font;hps;Consumer Dispute Settlement Board which is expected to be able to provide a fair settlement to the disputed parties turns out in practice causing confusion for those involved in the implementation process especially when there is an inclusion of the judiciary role in investigating the case of BPSK rejection decision. The problem is how the limited ability of UUPK law in the consumer disputes resolution is. The law (legislation) in relation to consumer protection has limited capabilities so it cannot realize the purpose of the law. The setting of BPSK there are limitations associated with the setting position of the judiciary.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T12:06:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd17105da7e1466f9a49b4f7404d0ab1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2086-2695
2527-4716
language Indonesian
last_indexed 2024-12-14T12:06:20Z
publishDate 2014-04-01
publisher University of Diponegoro, Faculty of Law
record_format Article
series Masalah-Masalah Hukum
spelling doaj.art-fd17105da7e1466f9a49b4f7404d0ab12022-12-21T23:01:53ZindUniversity of Diponegoro, Faculty of LawMasalah-Masalah Hukum2086-26952527-47162014-04-0143223323910.14710/mmh.43.2.2014.233-2397574KETERBATASAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMENTami RusliDefault Paragraph Font;hps;Consumer Dispute Settlement Board which is expected to be able to provide a fair settlement to the disputed parties turns out in practice causing confusion for those involved in the implementation process especially when there is an inclusion of the judiciary role in investigating the case of BPSK rejection decision. The problem is how the limited ability of UUPK law in the consumer disputes resolution is. The law (legislation) in relation to consumer protection has limited capabilities so it cannot realize the purpose of the law. The setting of BPSK there are limitations associated with the setting position of the judiciary.https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/9044BPSK, Dispute Resolution, Consumer
spellingShingle Tami Rusli
KETERBATASAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN
Masalah-Masalah Hukum
BPSK, Dispute Resolution, Consumer
title KETERBATASAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN
title_full KETERBATASAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN
title_fullStr KETERBATASAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN
title_full_unstemmed KETERBATASAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN
title_short KETERBATASAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN
title_sort keterbatasan badan penyelesaian sengketa konsumen dalam penyelesaian sengketa konsumen
topic BPSK, Dispute Resolution, Consumer
url https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/9044
work_keys_str_mv AT tamirusli keterbatasanbadanpenyelesaiansengketakonsumendalampenyelesaiansengketakonsumen