Barriers to the Use of Clinical Decision Support for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: Qualitative Interview Study

BackgroundClinicians often disregard potentially beneficial clinical decision support (CDS). ObjectiveIn this study, we sought to explore the psychological and behavioral barriers to the use of a CDS tool. MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study involv...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Safiya Richardson, Katherine L Dauber-Decker, Thomas McGinn, Douglas P Barnaby, Adithya Cattamanchi, Renee Pekmezaris
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:English
منشور في: JMIR Publications 2021-08-01
سلاسل:JMIR Human Factors
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2021/3/e25046
الوصف
الملخص:BackgroundClinicians often disregard potentially beneficial clinical decision support (CDS). ObjectiveIn this study, we sought to explore the psychological and behavioral barriers to the use of a CDS tool. MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study involving emergency medicine physicians and physician assistants. A semistructured interview guide was created based on the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behavior model. Interviews focused on the barriers to the use of a CDS tool built based on Wells’ criteria for pulmonary embolism to assist clinicians in establishing pretest probability of pulmonary embolism before imaging. ResultsInterviews were conducted with 12 clinicians. Six barriers were identified, including (1) Bayesian reasoning, (2) fear of missing a pulmonary embolism, (3) time pressure or cognitive load, (4) gestalt includes Wells’ criteria, (5) missed risk factors, and (6) social pressure. ConclusionsClinicians highlighted several important psychological and behavioral barriers to CDS use. Addressing these barriers will be paramount in developing CDS that can meet its potential to transform clinical care.
تدمد:2292-9495