Measures of journal quality should separate reviews from original research
Metrics of journal quality (e.g., impact factors) are often used to make important judgements regarding journal quality and importance. It is well known that reviews are more highly cited than original research articles. Therefore, it is not surprising that review journals within a field tend to hav...
Main Authors: | Sarah R Supp, Ethan P White |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Queen's University
2010-09-01
|
Series: | Ideas in Ecology and Evolution |
Online Access: | https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/IEE/article/view/2386 |
Similar Items
-
Citability of original research and reviews in journals and their sponsored supplements.
by: Leslie Citrome
Published: (2010-03-01) -
Academic journals should rethink the concept of originality before permitting the use of ChatGPT
by: Gengyan Tang
Published: (2023-05-01) -
Should language matter less to journals?
by: Erik von Elm
Published: (2006-05-01) -
I Don’t Peer-Review for Non-Open Journals, and Neither Should You
by: Taylor Michael P.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Journal of microcoloumn separations
Published: (1989)