A Comparative Study on the Safety Analysis Methods of STPA and ARP4761
STPA (systems theoretic process analysis) is a kind of system engineering method, which can be used for the complex system to analyze its safety. However at present, the method is not in practical use and cannot well reflect the advanced nature and applicability of the method. By analyzing and compa...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | zho |
| Published: |
Editorial Department of Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | Hangkong gongcheng jinzhan |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hkgcjz.cnjournals.com/hkgcjz/article/abstract/2019128?st=article_issue |
| _version_ | 1811302654925602816 |
|---|---|
| author | CUI Lijie TIAN Yu CONG Jiping MA Tao |
| author_facet | CUI Lijie TIAN Yu CONG Jiping MA Tao |
| author_sort | CUI Lijie |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | STPA (systems theoretic process analysis) is a kind of system engineering method, which can be used for the complex system to analyze its safety. However at present, the method is not in practical use and cannot well reflect the advanced nature and applicability of the method. By analyzing and comparing the STPA method with the analysis process in ARP4761, the conformity of STPA to GJB900A-2012 general requirements for equipment safety work is analyzed, which reflects the great advantages and applicability of STPA method and discovers its shortcomings. Some improvement measures are proposed in building functional control structure, identifying unsafe control behaviors and analyzing causes. The conclusion and proposed method can provide the theoretical and process guidance which is in line with the high-tech characteristics of modern aircraft and worthy of reference for the system-level safety design of complex aviation products. It deepens the integration of theory and practice, and provides reference for the further improvement of STPA method. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:33:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fd38c153f24d4db3b03c8f148559f146 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1674-8190 |
| language | zho |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:33:06Z |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | Editorial Department of Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Hangkong gongcheng jinzhan |
| spelling | doaj.art-fd38c153f24d4db3b03c8f148559f1462022-12-22T02:56:19ZzhoEditorial Department of Advances in Aeronautical Science and EngineeringHangkong gongcheng jinzhan1674-81902020-08-0111450851610.16615/j.cnki.1674-8190.2020.04.00820200408A Comparative Study on the Safety Analysis Methods of STPA and ARP4761CUI Lijie0TIAN Yu1CONG Jiping2MA Tao3College of Equipment Management and UAV Engineering, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, ChinaUnit 95655 of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Chengdu 611530, ChinaGraduate College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, ChinaCollege of Information and Navigation, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, ChinaSTPA (systems theoretic process analysis) is a kind of system engineering method, which can be used for the complex system to analyze its safety. However at present, the method is not in practical use and cannot well reflect the advanced nature and applicability of the method. By analyzing and comparing the STPA method with the analysis process in ARP4761, the conformity of STPA to GJB900A-2012 general requirements for equipment safety work is analyzed, which reflects the great advantages and applicability of STPA method and discovers its shortcomings. Some improvement measures are proposed in building functional control structure, identifying unsafe control behaviors and analyzing causes. The conclusion and proposed method can provide the theoretical and process guidance which is in line with the high-tech characteristics of modern aircraft and worthy of reference for the system-level safety design of complex aviation products. It deepens the integration of theory and practice, and provides reference for the further improvement of STPA method.http://hkgcjz.cnjournals.com/hkgcjz/article/abstract/2019128?st=article_issuestpa methodarp4761gjb900a-2012safety analysis |
| spellingShingle | CUI Lijie TIAN Yu CONG Jiping MA Tao A Comparative Study on the Safety Analysis Methods of STPA and ARP4761 Hangkong gongcheng jinzhan stpa method arp4761 gjb900a-2012 safety analysis |
| title | A Comparative Study on the Safety Analysis Methods of STPA and ARP4761 |
| title_full | A Comparative Study on the Safety Analysis Methods of STPA and ARP4761 |
| title_fullStr | A Comparative Study on the Safety Analysis Methods of STPA and ARP4761 |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study on the Safety Analysis Methods of STPA and ARP4761 |
| title_short | A Comparative Study on the Safety Analysis Methods of STPA and ARP4761 |
| title_sort | comparative study on the safety analysis methods of stpa and arp4761 |
| topic | stpa method arp4761 gjb900a-2012 safety analysis |
| url | http://hkgcjz.cnjournals.com/hkgcjz/article/abstract/2019128?st=article_issue |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cuilijie acomparativestudyonthesafetyanalysismethodsofstpaandarp4761 AT tianyu acomparativestudyonthesafetyanalysismethodsofstpaandarp4761 AT congjiping acomparativestudyonthesafetyanalysismethodsofstpaandarp4761 AT matao acomparativestudyonthesafetyanalysismethodsofstpaandarp4761 AT cuilijie comparativestudyonthesafetyanalysismethodsofstpaandarp4761 AT tianyu comparativestudyonthesafetyanalysismethodsofstpaandarp4761 AT congjiping comparativestudyonthesafetyanalysismethodsofstpaandarp4761 AT matao comparativestudyonthesafetyanalysismethodsofstpaandarp4761 |