Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in Finland
The aim of this study was to examine how well stem volume, above-ground biomass and dominant height can be predicted using nationwide airborne laser scanning (ALS) based regression models. The study material consisted of nine practical ALS inventory projects taken from different parts of Finland. We...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Finnish Society of Forest Science
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Silva Fennica |
| Online Access: | https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1567 |
| _version_ | 1818036925634707456 |
|---|---|
| author | Kotivuori, Eetu Korhonen, Lauri Packalen, Petteri |
| author_facet | Kotivuori, Eetu Korhonen, Lauri Packalen, Petteri |
| author_sort | Kotivuori, Eetu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this study was to examine how well stem volume, above-ground biomass and dominant height can be predicted using nationwide airborne laser scanning (ALS) based regression models. The study material consisted of nine practical ALS inventory projects taken from different parts of Finland. We used field sample plots and airborne laser scanning data to create nationwide and regional models for each response variable. The final models had one or two ALS predictors, which were chosen based on the root mean square error (RMSE), and cross-validated. Finally, we tested how much predictions would improve if the nationwide models were calibrated with a small number of regional sample plots. Although forest structures differ among different parts of Finland, the nationwide volume and biomass models performed quite well (leave-inventory-area-out RMSE 22.3% to 33.8%, mean difference [MD] â13.8% to 18.7%) compared with regional models (leave-plot-out RMSE 20.2% to 26.8%). However, the nationwide dominant height model (RMSE 5.4% to 7.7%, MD â2.0% to 2.8%, with the exception of the Tornio region â RMSE 11.4%, MD â9.1%) performed nearly as well as the regional models (RMSE 5.2% to 6.7%). The results show that the nationwide volume and biomass models provided different means than real means at regional level, because forest structure and ALS device have a considerable effect on the predictions. Large MDs appeared especially in northern Finland. Local calibration decreased the MD and RMSE of volume and biomass models. However, the nationwide dominant height model did not benefit much from calibration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T07:18:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fd3f3d300f514448b4e2ae558295b4f2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2242-4075 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T07:18:42Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Finnish Society of Forest Science |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Silva Fennica |
| spelling | doaj.art-fd3f3d300f514448b4e2ae558295b4f22022-12-22T01:57:53ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752016-01-0150410.14214/sf.1567Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in FinlandKotivuori, EetuKorhonen, LauriPackalen, PetteriThe aim of this study was to examine how well stem volume, above-ground biomass and dominant height can be predicted using nationwide airborne laser scanning (ALS) based regression models. The study material consisted of nine practical ALS inventory projects taken from different parts of Finland. We used field sample plots and airborne laser scanning data to create nationwide and regional models for each response variable. The final models had one or two ALS predictors, which were chosen based on the root mean square error (RMSE), and cross-validated. Finally, we tested how much predictions would improve if the nationwide models were calibrated with a small number of regional sample plots. Although forest structures differ among different parts of Finland, the nationwide volume and biomass models performed quite well (leave-inventory-area-out RMSE 22.3% to 33.8%, mean difference [MD] â13.8% to 18.7%) compared with regional models (leave-plot-out RMSE 20.2% to 26.8%). However, the nationwide dominant height model (RMSE 5.4% to 7.7%, MD â2.0% to 2.8%, with the exception of the Tornio region â RMSE 11.4%, MD â9.1%) performed nearly as well as the regional models (RMSE 5.2% to 6.7%). The results show that the nationwide volume and biomass models provided different means than real means at regional level, because forest structure and ALS device have a considerable effect on the predictions. Large MDs appeared especially in northern Finland. Local calibration decreased the MD and RMSE of volume and biomass models. However, the nationwide dominant height model did not benefit much from calibration.https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1567 |
| spellingShingle | Kotivuori, Eetu Korhonen, Lauri Packalen, Petteri Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in Finland Silva Fennica |
| title | Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in Finland |
| title_full | Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in Finland |
| title_fullStr | Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in Finland |
| title_full_unstemmed | Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in Finland |
| title_short | Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in Finland |
| title_sort | nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume biomass and dominant height in finland |
| url | https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1567 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kotivuorieetu nationwideairbornelaserscanningbasedmodelsforvolumebiomassanddominantheightinfinland AT korhonenlauri nationwideairbornelaserscanningbasedmodelsforvolumebiomassanddominantheightinfinland AT packalenpetteri nationwideairbornelaserscanningbasedmodelsforvolumebiomassanddominantheightinfinland |