The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety
Research has demonstrated that metacognition accuracy is far from perfect. The accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs) is of critical importance in self-regulated learning. To explore what factors constrain JOL accuracy, the current study focused on mindfulness, which is intimately related to metac...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Intelligence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/7/132 |
_version_ | 1797588804389830656 |
---|---|
author | Yue Yin Baike Li Xiao Hu Xiaolin Guo Chunliang Yang Liang Luo |
author_facet | Yue Yin Baike Li Xiao Hu Xiaolin Guo Chunliang Yang Liang Luo |
author_sort | Yue Yin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Research has demonstrated that metacognition accuracy is far from perfect. The accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs) is of critical importance in self-regulated learning. To explore what factors constrain JOL accuracy, the current study focused on mindfulness, which is intimately related to metacognition and anxiety. A total of 203 undergraduates (198 valid samples) were recruited to determine the relationships among five dimensions of dispositional mindfulness, test anxiety, and relative accuracy of JOLs. Results revealed that the interaction term for acting with awareness and test anxiety significantly predicted JOL accuracy. Further analyses indicated that for individuals with high test anxiety, but not for those with low test anxiety, acting with awareness positively predicted JOL accuracy. Considering that dispositional mindfulness is modifiable, these results help to inspire researchers to further explore whether mindfulness training can be used as a remedy to improve JOL accuracy. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:57:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fd40632e16394b5696376d5495ee9fb5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2079-3200 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:57:15Z |
publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Intelligence |
spelling | doaj.art-fd40632e16394b5696376d5495ee9fb52023-11-18T19:57:16ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002023-07-0111713210.3390/jintelligence11070132The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test AnxietyYue Yin0Baike Li1Xiao Hu2Xiaolin Guo3Chunliang Yang4Liang Luo5Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaInstitute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaInstitute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaInstitute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaResearch has demonstrated that metacognition accuracy is far from perfect. The accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs) is of critical importance in self-regulated learning. To explore what factors constrain JOL accuracy, the current study focused on mindfulness, which is intimately related to metacognition and anxiety. A total of 203 undergraduates (198 valid samples) were recruited to determine the relationships among five dimensions of dispositional mindfulness, test anxiety, and relative accuracy of JOLs. Results revealed that the interaction term for acting with awareness and test anxiety significantly predicted JOL accuracy. Further analyses indicated that for individuals with high test anxiety, but not for those with low test anxiety, acting with awareness positively predicted JOL accuracy. Considering that dispositional mindfulness is modifiable, these results help to inspire researchers to further explore whether mindfulness training can be used as a remedy to improve JOL accuracy.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/7/132judgments of learningmetamemory accuracydispositional mindfulnesstest anxietymoderating effect |
spellingShingle | Yue Yin Baike Li Xiao Hu Xiaolin Guo Chunliang Yang Liang Luo The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety Journal of Intelligence judgments of learning metamemory accuracy dispositional mindfulness test anxiety moderating effect |
title | The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety |
title_full | The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety |
title_fullStr | The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety |
title_full_unstemmed | The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety |
title_short | The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety |
title_sort | relationship between dispositional mindfulness and relative accuracy of judgments of learning the moderating role of test anxiety |
topic | judgments of learning metamemory accuracy dispositional mindfulness test anxiety moderating effect |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/7/132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yueyin therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT baikeli therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT xiaohu therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT xiaolinguo therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT chunliangyang therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT liangluo therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT yueyin relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT baikeli relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT xiaohu relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT xiaolinguo relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT chunliangyang relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety AT liangluo relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety |