The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety

Research has demonstrated that metacognition accuracy is far from perfect. The accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs) is of critical importance in self-regulated learning. To explore what factors constrain JOL accuracy, the current study focused on mindfulness, which is intimately related to metac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yue Yin, Baike Li, Xiao Hu, Xiaolin Guo, Chunliang Yang, Liang Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Journal of Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/7/132
_version_ 1797588804389830656
author Yue Yin
Baike Li
Xiao Hu
Xiaolin Guo
Chunliang Yang
Liang Luo
author_facet Yue Yin
Baike Li
Xiao Hu
Xiaolin Guo
Chunliang Yang
Liang Luo
author_sort Yue Yin
collection DOAJ
description Research has demonstrated that metacognition accuracy is far from perfect. The accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs) is of critical importance in self-regulated learning. To explore what factors constrain JOL accuracy, the current study focused on mindfulness, which is intimately related to metacognition and anxiety. A total of 203 undergraduates (198 valid samples) were recruited to determine the relationships among five dimensions of dispositional mindfulness, test anxiety, and relative accuracy of JOLs. Results revealed that the interaction term for acting with awareness and test anxiety significantly predicted JOL accuracy. Further analyses indicated that for individuals with high test anxiety, but not for those with low test anxiety, acting with awareness positively predicted JOL accuracy. Considering that dispositional mindfulness is modifiable, these results help to inspire researchers to further explore whether mindfulness training can be used as a remedy to improve JOL accuracy.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T00:57:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd40632e16394b5696376d5495ee9fb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-3200
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T00:57:15Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Intelligence
spelling doaj.art-fd40632e16394b5696376d5495ee9fb52023-11-18T19:57:16ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002023-07-0111713210.3390/jintelligence11070132The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test AnxietyYue Yin0Baike Li1Xiao Hu2Xiaolin Guo3Chunliang Yang4Liang Luo5Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaInstitute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaInstitute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaInstitute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaResearch has demonstrated that metacognition accuracy is far from perfect. The accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs) is of critical importance in self-regulated learning. To explore what factors constrain JOL accuracy, the current study focused on mindfulness, which is intimately related to metacognition and anxiety. A total of 203 undergraduates (198 valid samples) were recruited to determine the relationships among five dimensions of dispositional mindfulness, test anxiety, and relative accuracy of JOLs. Results revealed that the interaction term for acting with awareness and test anxiety significantly predicted JOL accuracy. Further analyses indicated that for individuals with high test anxiety, but not for those with low test anxiety, acting with awareness positively predicted JOL accuracy. Considering that dispositional mindfulness is modifiable, these results help to inspire researchers to further explore whether mindfulness training can be used as a remedy to improve JOL accuracy.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/7/132judgments of learningmetamemory accuracydispositional mindfulnesstest anxietymoderating effect
spellingShingle Yue Yin
Baike Li
Xiao Hu
Xiaolin Guo
Chunliang Yang
Liang Luo
The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety
Journal of Intelligence
judgments of learning
metamemory accuracy
dispositional mindfulness
test anxiety
moderating effect
title The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety
title_full The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety
title_fullStr The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety
title_short The Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Relative Accuracy of Judgments of Learning: The Moderating Role of Test Anxiety
title_sort relationship between dispositional mindfulness and relative accuracy of judgments of learning the moderating role of test anxiety
topic judgments of learning
metamemory accuracy
dispositional mindfulness
test anxiety
moderating effect
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/7/132
work_keys_str_mv AT yueyin therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT baikeli therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT xiaohu therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT xiaolinguo therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT chunliangyang therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT liangluo therelationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT yueyin relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT baikeli relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT xiaohu relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT xiaolinguo relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT chunliangyang relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety
AT liangluo relationshipbetweendispositionalmindfulnessandrelativeaccuracyofjudgmentsoflearningthemoderatingroleoftestanxiety