Dwa kryzysy i rewolucja: wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r. na Ukrainie w perspektywie porównawczej

Two Crises and a Revolution: 2004 and 2014 Events in Ukraine in Comparative Perspective Why has V. Yanukovych been long able to survive while L. Kuchma failed? This paper seeks to locate the factors leading to the quick downfall of the Kuchma’s regime in Ukraine in 2004 in comparison to the extend...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jurij Macijewśkyj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2015-05-01
Series:Politeja
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2382
_version_ 1818980913010180096
author Jurij Macijewśkyj
author_facet Jurij Macijewśkyj
author_sort Jurij Macijewśkyj
collection DOAJ
description Two Crises and a Revolution: 2004 and 2014 Events in Ukraine in Comparative Perspective Why has V. Yanukovych been long able to survive while L. Kuchma failed? This paper seeks to locate the factors leading to the quick downfall of the Kuchma’s regime in Ukraine in 2004 in comparison to the extended regime survival in 2014. Drawing on the political science theories of dynamics of hybrid regimes and revolution, the author advances two theses: first, the mass mobilization is necessary but not a sufficient condition for the collapse of an autocrat. Comparing the two crisis episodes of 2004 and 2014 in Ukraine by using ten indicators, the author argues that the regime’s organizational capacity initially was higher than both Western democratic pressure and “people’s power”. Only after the third violent attempt to disperse Maidan had failed, the “power vertical” collapsed what led to the creation of a new parliamentary majority and effective loss of power by the incumbent. Second, unlike the crisis of 2004 the crisis of 2014 has not been resolved through the compromise and turned into a revolution. Applying eleven, analytically defined, attributes of the revolution to the Orange events of 2004 resulted only in three matches, while in 2014 there are already seven matches (breakdown of the state, international pressure, economic decline, conflict between elites, mass mobilization, “multiple sovereignty” and violence) and two others (the change of regime and the change of social structure) is theoretically possible. The presence of these attributes suggests that in 2014 Ukraine had a political, but could hardly have a social revolution.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T17:22:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd4994f68a8d42689ff4f0e02b933706
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1733-6716
2391-6737
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T17:22:58Z
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
record_format Article
series Politeja
spelling doaj.art-fd4994f68a8d42689ff4f0e02b9337062022-12-21T19:31:43ZengKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingPoliteja1733-67162391-67372015-05-01122 (34/1)10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.34_1.03Dwa kryzysy i rewolucja: wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r. na Ukrainie w perspektywie porównawczejJurij Macijewśkyj0Narodowy Uniwersytet „Akademia Ostrogska”Two Crises and a Revolution: 2004 and 2014 Events in Ukraine in Comparative Perspective Why has V. Yanukovych been long able to survive while L. Kuchma failed? This paper seeks to locate the factors leading to the quick downfall of the Kuchma’s regime in Ukraine in 2004 in comparison to the extended regime survival in 2014. Drawing on the political science theories of dynamics of hybrid regimes and revolution, the author advances two theses: first, the mass mobilization is necessary but not a sufficient condition for the collapse of an autocrat. Comparing the two crisis episodes of 2004 and 2014 in Ukraine by using ten indicators, the author argues that the regime’s organizational capacity initially was higher than both Western democratic pressure and “people’s power”. Only after the third violent attempt to disperse Maidan had failed, the “power vertical” collapsed what led to the creation of a new parliamentary majority and effective loss of power by the incumbent. Second, unlike the crisis of 2004 the crisis of 2014 has not been resolved through the compromise and turned into a revolution. Applying eleven, analytically defined, attributes of the revolution to the Orange events of 2004 resulted only in three matches, while in 2014 there are already seven matches (breakdown of the state, international pressure, economic decline, conflict between elites, mass mobilization, “multiple sovereignty” and violence) and two others (the change of regime and the change of social structure) is theoretically possible. The presence of these attributes suggests that in 2014 Ukraine had a political, but could hardly have a social revolution.https://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2382przetrwanie reżimuupadek reżimuW. JanukowyczUkrainakryzysrewolucja polityczna
spellingShingle Jurij Macijewśkyj
Dwa kryzysy i rewolucja: wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r. na Ukrainie w perspektywie porównawczej
Politeja
przetrwanie reżimu
upadek reżimu
W. Janukowycz
Ukraina
kryzys
rewolucja polityczna
title Dwa kryzysy i rewolucja: wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r. na Ukrainie w perspektywie porównawczej
title_full Dwa kryzysy i rewolucja: wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r. na Ukrainie w perspektywie porównawczej
title_fullStr Dwa kryzysy i rewolucja: wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r. na Ukrainie w perspektywie porównawczej
title_full_unstemmed Dwa kryzysy i rewolucja: wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r. na Ukrainie w perspektywie porównawczej
title_short Dwa kryzysy i rewolucja: wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r. na Ukrainie w perspektywie porównawczej
title_sort dwa kryzysy i rewolucja wydarzenia 2004 i 2014 r na ukrainie w perspektywie porownawczej
topic przetrwanie reżimu
upadek reżimu
W. Janukowycz
Ukraina
kryzys
rewolucja polityczna
url https://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2382
work_keys_str_mv AT jurijmacijewskyj dwakryzysyirewolucjawydarzenia2004i2014rnaukrainiewperspektywieporownawczej