Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and Challenges

This review is a part of the SI ‘Genome-Scale Modeling of Microorganisms in the Real World’. The goal of GEM is the accurate prediction of the phenotype from its respective genotype under specified environmental conditions. This review focuses on the dynamic phenotype; prediction of the real-life be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolai S. Panikov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/11/2352
_version_ 1797509272867700736
author Nicolai S. Panikov
author_facet Nicolai S. Panikov
author_sort Nicolai S. Panikov
collection DOAJ
description This review is a part of the SI ‘Genome-Scale Modeling of Microorganisms in the Real World’. The goal of GEM is the accurate prediction of the phenotype from its respective genotype under specified environmental conditions. This review focuses on the dynamic phenotype; prediction of the real-life behaviors of microorganisms, such as cell proliferation, dormancy, and mortality; balanced and unbalanced growth; steady-state and transient processes; primary and secondary metabolism; stress responses; etc. Constraint-based metabolic reconstructions were successfully started two decades ago as FBA, followed by more advanced models, but this review starts from the earlier nongenomic predecessors to show that some GEMs inherited the outdated biokinetic frameworks compromising their performances. The most essential deficiencies are: (i) an inadequate account of environmental conditions, such as various degrees of nutrients limitation and other factors shaping phenotypes; (ii) a failure to simulate the adaptive changes of MMCC (MacroMolecular Cell Composition) in response to the fluctuating environment; (iii) the misinterpretation of the SGR (Specific Growth Rate) as either a fixed constant parameter of the model or independent factor affecting the conditional expression of macromolecules; (iv) neglecting stress resistance as an important objective function; and (v) inefficient experimental verification of GEM against simple growth (constant MMCC and SGR) data. Finally, we propose several ways to improve GEMs, such as replacing the outdated Monod equation with the SCM (Synthetic Chemostat Model) that establishes the quantitative relationships between primary and secondary metabolism, growth rate and stress resistance, process kinetics, and cell composition.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:15:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd4e41c8b5ae486da7685dc7683d79ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2607
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:15:22Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj.art-fd4e41c8b5ae486da7685dc7683d79ac2023-11-23T00:30:09ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072021-11-01911235210.3390/microorganisms9112352Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and ChallengesNicolai S. Panikov0Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USAThis review is a part of the SI ‘Genome-Scale Modeling of Microorganisms in the Real World’. The goal of GEM is the accurate prediction of the phenotype from its respective genotype under specified environmental conditions. This review focuses on the dynamic phenotype; prediction of the real-life behaviors of microorganisms, such as cell proliferation, dormancy, and mortality; balanced and unbalanced growth; steady-state and transient processes; primary and secondary metabolism; stress responses; etc. Constraint-based metabolic reconstructions were successfully started two decades ago as FBA, followed by more advanced models, but this review starts from the earlier nongenomic predecessors to show that some GEMs inherited the outdated biokinetic frameworks compromising their performances. The most essential deficiencies are: (i) an inadequate account of environmental conditions, such as various degrees of nutrients limitation and other factors shaping phenotypes; (ii) a failure to simulate the adaptive changes of MMCC (MacroMolecular Cell Composition) in response to the fluctuating environment; (iii) the misinterpretation of the SGR (Specific Growth Rate) as either a fixed constant parameter of the model or independent factor affecting the conditional expression of macromolecules; (iv) neglecting stress resistance as an important objective function; and (v) inefficient experimental verification of GEM against simple growth (constant MMCC and SGR) data. Finally, we propose several ways to improve GEMs, such as replacing the outdated Monod equation with the SCM (Synthetic Chemostat Model) that establishes the quantitative relationships between primary and secondary metabolism, growth rate and stress resistance, process kinetics, and cell composition.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/11/2352growth kineticssurvivaldeathsubstrate limitationstarvationgene expression
spellingShingle Nicolai S. Panikov
Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and Challenges
Microorganisms
growth kinetics
survival
death
substrate limitation
starvation
gene expression
title Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and Challenges
title_full Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and Challenges
title_fullStr Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and Challenges
title_short Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and Challenges
title_sort genome scale reconstruction of microbial dynamic phenotype successes and challenges
topic growth kinetics
survival
death
substrate limitation
starvation
gene expression
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/11/2352
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolaispanikov genomescalereconstructionofmicrobialdynamicphenotypesuccessesandchallenges