Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021

Abstract Background Nepal is committed to achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2030 target 3.1 of reducing the maternal mortality ratio to 70 deaths per 100,000 live births. Along with increasing access to health facility (HF)-based delivery services, improving HF readiness is critically...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabita Tuladhar, Deepak Paudel, Eva Rehfuess, Matthias Siebeck, Cornelia Oberhauser, Maria Delius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-01-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06138-8
_version_ 1797276304888823808
author Sabita Tuladhar
Deepak Paudel
Eva Rehfuess
Matthias Siebeck
Cornelia Oberhauser
Maria Delius
author_facet Sabita Tuladhar
Deepak Paudel
Eva Rehfuess
Matthias Siebeck
Cornelia Oberhauser
Maria Delius
author_sort Sabita Tuladhar
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Nepal is committed to achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2030 target 3.1 of reducing the maternal mortality ratio to 70 deaths per 100,000 live births. Along with increasing access to health facility (HF)-based delivery services, improving HF readiness is critically important. The majority of births in Nepal are normal low-risk births and most of them take place in public HFs, as does the majority of maternal deaths. This study aims to assess changes in HF readiness in Nepal between 2015 and 2021, notably, if HF readiness for providing high-quality services for normal low-risk deliveries improved; if the functionality of basic emergency obstetric and neonatal care (BEmONC) services increased; and if infection prevention and control improved. Methods Cross-sectional data from two nationally representative HF-based surveys in 2015 and 2021 were analyzed. This included 457 HFs in 2015 and 804 HFs in 2021, providing normal low-risk delivery services. Indices for HF readiness for normal low-risk delivery services, BEmONC service functionality, and infection prevention and control were computed. Independent sample T-test was used to measure changes over time. The results were stratified by public versus private HFs. Results Despite a statistically significant increase in the overall HF readiness index for normal low-risk delivery services, from 37.9% in 2015 to 43.7%, in 2021, HF readiness in 2021 remained inadequate. The availability of trained providers, essential medicines for mothers, and basic equipment and supplies was high, while that of essential medicines for newborns was moderate; availability of delivery care guidelines was low. BEmONC service functionality did not improve and remained below five percent facility coverage at both time points. In private HFs, readiness for good quality obstetrical care was higher than in public HFs at both time points. The infection prevention and control index improved over time; however, facility coverage in 2021 remained below ten percent. Conclusions The slow progress and sub-optimal readiness for normal, low-risk deliveries and infection prevention and control, along with declining and low BEmONC service functionality in 2021 is reflective of poor quality of care and provides some proximate explanation for the moderately high maternal mortality and the stagnation of neonatal mortality in Nepal. To reach the SDG 2030 target of reducing maternal deaths, Nepal must hasten its efforts to strengthen supply chain systems to enhance the availability and utilization of essential medicines, equipment, and supplies, along with guidelines, to bolster the human resource capacity, and to implement mechanisms to monitor quality of care. In general, the capacity of local governments to deliver basic healthcare services needs to be increased.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:25:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd5044354ebb43398a12662affe03cbe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:25:23Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-fd5044354ebb43398a12662affe03cbe2024-03-05T17:08:45ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932024-01-0124111510.1186/s12884-023-06138-8Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021Sabita Tuladhar0Deepak Paudel1Eva Rehfuess2Matthias Siebeck3Cornelia Oberhauser4Maria Delius5Teaching & Training Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMUSave the ChildrenInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMUInstitute of Medical Education, LMU, University Hospital, LMUInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMUDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMUAbstract Background Nepal is committed to achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2030 target 3.1 of reducing the maternal mortality ratio to 70 deaths per 100,000 live births. Along with increasing access to health facility (HF)-based delivery services, improving HF readiness is critically important. The majority of births in Nepal are normal low-risk births and most of them take place in public HFs, as does the majority of maternal deaths. This study aims to assess changes in HF readiness in Nepal between 2015 and 2021, notably, if HF readiness for providing high-quality services for normal low-risk deliveries improved; if the functionality of basic emergency obstetric and neonatal care (BEmONC) services increased; and if infection prevention and control improved. Methods Cross-sectional data from two nationally representative HF-based surveys in 2015 and 2021 were analyzed. This included 457 HFs in 2015 and 804 HFs in 2021, providing normal low-risk delivery services. Indices for HF readiness for normal low-risk delivery services, BEmONC service functionality, and infection prevention and control were computed. Independent sample T-test was used to measure changes over time. The results were stratified by public versus private HFs. Results Despite a statistically significant increase in the overall HF readiness index for normal low-risk delivery services, from 37.9% in 2015 to 43.7%, in 2021, HF readiness in 2021 remained inadequate. The availability of trained providers, essential medicines for mothers, and basic equipment and supplies was high, while that of essential medicines for newborns was moderate; availability of delivery care guidelines was low. BEmONC service functionality did not improve and remained below five percent facility coverage at both time points. In private HFs, readiness for good quality obstetrical care was higher than in public HFs at both time points. The infection prevention and control index improved over time; however, facility coverage in 2021 remained below ten percent. Conclusions The slow progress and sub-optimal readiness for normal, low-risk deliveries and infection prevention and control, along with declining and low BEmONC service functionality in 2021 is reflective of poor quality of care and provides some proximate explanation for the moderately high maternal mortality and the stagnation of neonatal mortality in Nepal. To reach the SDG 2030 target of reducing maternal deaths, Nepal must hasten its efforts to strengthen supply chain systems to enhance the availability and utilization of essential medicines, equipment, and supplies, along with guidelines, to bolster the human resource capacity, and to implement mechanisms to monitor quality of care. In general, the capacity of local governments to deliver basic healthcare services needs to be increased.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06138-8Delivery servicesMaternal healthNewborn healthQuality of careEmergency obstetric and neonatal care
spellingShingle Sabita Tuladhar
Deepak Paudel
Eva Rehfuess
Matthias Siebeck
Cornelia Oberhauser
Maria Delius
Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Delivery services
Maternal health
Newborn health
Quality of care
Emergency obstetric and neonatal care
title Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021
title_full Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021
title_fullStr Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021
title_full_unstemmed Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021
title_short Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021
title_sort changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in nepal an analysis of cross sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021
topic Delivery services
Maternal health
Newborn health
Quality of care
Emergency obstetric and neonatal care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06138-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sabitatuladhar changesinhealthfacilityreadinessforobstetricandneonatalcareservicesinnepalananalysisofcrosssectionalhealthfacilitysurveydatain2015and2021
AT deepakpaudel changesinhealthfacilityreadinessforobstetricandneonatalcareservicesinnepalananalysisofcrosssectionalhealthfacilitysurveydatain2015and2021
AT evarehfuess changesinhealthfacilityreadinessforobstetricandneonatalcareservicesinnepalananalysisofcrosssectionalhealthfacilitysurveydatain2015and2021
AT matthiassiebeck changesinhealthfacilityreadinessforobstetricandneonatalcareservicesinnepalananalysisofcrosssectionalhealthfacilitysurveydatain2015and2021
AT corneliaoberhauser changesinhealthfacilityreadinessforobstetricandneonatalcareservicesinnepalananalysisofcrosssectionalhealthfacilitysurveydatain2015and2021
AT mariadelius changesinhealthfacilityreadinessforobstetricandneonatalcareservicesinnepalananalysisofcrosssectionalhealthfacilitysurveydatain2015and2021