Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imagery

Small mountain glaciers are an important part of the cryosphere and tend to respond rapidly to climate warming. Historically, mapping very small glaciers (generally considered to be <0.5 km2) using satellite imagery has often been subjective due to the difficulty in differentiating them from pere...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. R. Leigh, C. R. Stokes, R. J. Carr, I. S. Evans, L. M. Andreassen, D. J. A. Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000509/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811155838193106944
author J. R. Leigh
C. R. Stokes
R. J. Carr
I. S. Evans
L. M. Andreassen
D. J. A. Evans
author_facet J. R. Leigh
C. R. Stokes
R. J. Carr
I. S. Evans
L. M. Andreassen
D. J. A. Evans
author_sort J. R. Leigh
collection DOAJ
description Small mountain glaciers are an important part of the cryosphere and tend to respond rapidly to climate warming. Historically, mapping very small glaciers (generally considered to be <0.5 km2) using satellite imagery has often been subjective due to the difficulty in differentiating them from perennial snowpatches. For this reason, most scientists implement minimum size-thresholds (typically 0.01–0.05 km2). Here, we compare the ability of different remote-sensing approaches to identify and map very small glaciers on imagery of varying spatial resolutions (30–0.25 m) and investigate how operator subjectivity influences the results. Based on this analysis, we support the use of a minimum size-threshold of 0.01 km2 for imagery with coarse to medium spatial resolution (30–10 m). However, when mapping on high-resolution imagery (<1 m) with minimal seasonal snow cover, glaciers <0.05 km2 and even <0.01 km2 are readily identifiable and using a minimum threshold may be inappropriate. For these cases, we develop a set of criteria to enable the identification of very small glaciers and classify them as certain, probable or possible. This should facilitate a more consistent approach to identifying and mapping very small glaciers on high-resolution imagery, helping to produce more comprehensive and accurate glacier inventories.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:41:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd5c494342e54d68a501ee8545c72c69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:41:21Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Glaciology
spelling doaj.art-fd5c494342e54d68a501ee8545c72c692023-03-09T12:40:49ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522019-12-016587388810.1017/jog.2019.50Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imageryJ. R. Leigh0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2719-9748C. R. Stokes1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-1573R. J. Carr2I. S. Evans3L. M. Andreassen4D. J. A. Evans5Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UKDepartment of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UKSchool of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKDepartment of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UKNorwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UKSmall mountain glaciers are an important part of the cryosphere and tend to respond rapidly to climate warming. Historically, mapping very small glaciers (generally considered to be <0.5 km2) using satellite imagery has often been subjective due to the difficulty in differentiating them from perennial snowpatches. For this reason, most scientists implement minimum size-thresholds (typically 0.01–0.05 km2). Here, we compare the ability of different remote-sensing approaches to identify and map very small glaciers on imagery of varying spatial resolutions (30–0.25 m) and investigate how operator subjectivity influences the results. Based on this analysis, we support the use of a minimum size-threshold of 0.01 km2 for imagery with coarse to medium spatial resolution (30–10 m). However, when mapping on high-resolution imagery (<1 m) with minimal seasonal snow cover, glaciers <0.05 km2 and even <0.01 km2 are readily identifiable and using a minimum threshold may be inappropriate. For these cases, we develop a set of criteria to enable the identification of very small glaciers and classify them as certain, probable or possible. This should facilitate a more consistent approach to identifying and mapping very small glaciers on high-resolution imagery, helping to produce more comprehensive and accurate glacier inventories.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000509/type/journal_articleGlacier fluctuationsglacier mappingmountain glaciersremote sensing
spellingShingle J. R. Leigh
C. R. Stokes
R. J. Carr
I. S. Evans
L. M. Andreassen
D. J. A. Evans
Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imagery
Journal of Glaciology
Glacier fluctuations
glacier mapping
mountain glaciers
remote sensing
title Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imagery
title_full Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imagery
title_fullStr Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imagery
title_full_unstemmed Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imagery
title_short Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imagery
title_sort identifying and mapping very small 0 5 km2 mountain glaciers on coarse to high resolution imagery
topic Glacier fluctuations
glacier mapping
mountain glaciers
remote sensing
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143019000509/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT jrleigh identifyingandmappingverysmall05km2mountainglaciersoncoarsetohighresolutionimagery
AT crstokes identifyingandmappingverysmall05km2mountainglaciersoncoarsetohighresolutionimagery
AT rjcarr identifyingandmappingverysmall05km2mountainglaciersoncoarsetohighresolutionimagery
AT isevans identifyingandmappingverysmall05km2mountainglaciersoncoarsetohighresolutionimagery
AT lmandreassen identifyingandmappingverysmall05km2mountainglaciersoncoarsetohighresolutionimagery
AT djaevans identifyingandmappingverysmall05km2mountainglaciersoncoarsetohighresolutionimagery