Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health
ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of systematic review / Meta analysis （SR/MA） of intervention randomized controlled trial （RCT） published in the Sichuan Mental Health.MethodsThe literature databases such as Wanfang Data， China National Knowledge Infrastructure （CNKI）， VIP Database for...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | zho |
| Published: |
Editorial Office of Sichuan Mental Health
2022-04-01
|
| Series: | Sichuan jingshen weisheng |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.psychjm.net.cn/scjswszzen/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=202202018&flag=1 |
| _version_ | 1797627641602244608 |
|---|---|
| author | Che Peng Hu Jun Tang Xueli Huang Ke Li Linguo Yin Chunyan |
| author_facet | Che Peng Hu Jun Tang Xueli Huang Ke Li Linguo Yin Chunyan |
| author_sort | Che Peng |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of systematic review / Meta analysis （SR/MA） of intervention randomized controlled trial （RCT） published in the Sichuan Mental Health.MethodsThe literature databases such as Wanfang Data， China National Knowledge Infrastructure （CNKI）， VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodical （VIP） and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database （CBM） were searched for the SRs/MAs of intervention RCTs published in the Sichuan Mental Health from the initial issue to the issue published on 31 June 2021. Then the methodological quality of eligible SRs/MAs were assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 （AMSTAR 2）.ResultsThe literature search yielded 24 full-text articles， and the mean AMSTAR 2 score of the included SRs/MAs was （5.21±3.63） with a range from 1 to 11. The total AMSTAR 2 score for SRs/MAs showed difference in terms of the publication date prior to or later than the publication of AMSTAR-2 tool （t=-5.499）， number of authors ≤ 2 or ≥ 3 （t=-6.736）， with or without funding support （t=3.329） and author unit nature （F=7.827）， with statistical significance （P<0.01）. All selected studies had deficiencies on explicit statement of a priori design and registrations， list of excluded studies and reasons for exclusion， sources of funding for the research in systematic review， potential conflicts of interest statement， and funding information of the systematic review.ConclusionThe methodological quality of SRs/MAs of intervention RCTs published in the Sichuan Mental Health varies widely， After the release of AMSTAR 2， the methodological quality has improved， but the report still needs to be further standardized to provide high-quality evidence-based evidence. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T10:27:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fd72ce75558d4f818e6da92c50fa4e60 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1007-3256 |
| language | zho |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T10:27:14Z |
| publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
| publisher | Editorial Office of Sichuan Mental Health |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sichuan jingshen weisheng |
| spelling | doaj.art-fd72ce75558d4f818e6da92c50fa4e602023-11-15T12:27:59ZzhoEditorial Office of Sichuan Mental HealthSichuan jingshen weisheng1007-32562022-04-0135218819310.11886/scjsws202108040011007-3256（2022）02-0188-06Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental HealthChe PengHu JunTang XueliHuang KeLi LinguoYin ChunyanObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of systematic review / Meta analysis （SR/MA） of intervention randomized controlled trial （RCT） published in the Sichuan Mental Health.MethodsThe literature databases such as Wanfang Data， China National Knowledge Infrastructure （CNKI）， VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodical （VIP） and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database （CBM） were searched for the SRs/MAs of intervention RCTs published in the Sichuan Mental Health from the initial issue to the issue published on 31 June 2021. Then the methodological quality of eligible SRs/MAs were assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 （AMSTAR 2）.ResultsThe literature search yielded 24 full-text articles， and the mean AMSTAR 2 score of the included SRs/MAs was （5.21±3.63） with a range from 1 to 11. The total AMSTAR 2 score for SRs/MAs showed difference in terms of the publication date prior to or later than the publication of AMSTAR-2 tool （t=-5.499）， number of authors ≤ 2 or ≥ 3 （t=-6.736）， with or without funding support （t=3.329） and author unit nature （F=7.827）， with statistical significance （P<0.01）. All selected studies had deficiencies on explicit statement of a priori design and registrations， list of excluded studies and reasons for exclusion， sources of funding for the research in systematic review， potential conflicts of interest statement， and funding information of the systematic review.ConclusionThe methodological quality of SRs/MAs of intervention RCTs published in the Sichuan Mental Health varies widely， After the release of AMSTAR 2， the methodological quality has improved， but the report still needs to be further standardized to provide high-quality evidence-based evidence.http://www.psychjm.net.cn/scjswszzen/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=202202018&flag=1systematic reviewmeta-analysisreporting qualityamstar 2sichuan mental health |
| spellingShingle | Che Peng Hu Jun Tang Xueli Huang Ke Li Linguo Yin Chunyan Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health Sichuan jingshen weisheng systematic review meta-analysis reporting quality amstar 2 sichuan mental health |
| title | Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health |
| title_full | Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health |
| title_fullStr | Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health |
| title_full_unstemmed | Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health |
| title_short | Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health |
| title_sort | methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the sichuan mental health |
| topic | systematic review meta-analysis reporting quality amstar 2 sichuan mental health |
| url | http://www.psychjm.net.cn/scjswszzen/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=202202018&flag=1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chepeng methodologicalqualityassessmentofsystematicreviewsormetaanalysesofinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedinthesichuanmentalhealth AT hujun methodologicalqualityassessmentofsystematicreviewsormetaanalysesofinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedinthesichuanmentalhealth AT tangxueli methodologicalqualityassessmentofsystematicreviewsormetaanalysesofinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedinthesichuanmentalhealth AT huangke methodologicalqualityassessmentofsystematicreviewsormetaanalysesofinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedinthesichuanmentalhealth AT lilinguo methodologicalqualityassessmentofsystematicreviewsormetaanalysesofinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedinthesichuanmentalhealth AT yinchunyan methodologicalqualityassessmentofsystematicreviewsormetaanalysesofinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrialspublishedinthesichuanmentalhealth |