Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs

Bipolar argument graphs represent the structure of complex pro and contra arguments for one or more standpoints. In this article, ampliative and exclusionary principles of evaluating argument strength in bipolar acyclic argumentation graphs are laid out and compared to each other. Argument chains, l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rast Erich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-09-01
Series:Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0027
_version_ 1818871909583945728
author Rast Erich
author_facet Rast Erich
author_sort Rast Erich
collection DOAJ
description Bipolar argument graphs represent the structure of complex pro and contra arguments for one or more standpoints. In this article, ampliative and exclusionary principles of evaluating argument strength in bipolar acyclic argumentation graphs are laid out and compared to each other. Argument chains, linked arguments, link attackers and supporters, and convergent arguments are discussed. The strength of conductive arguments is also addressed but it is argued that more work on this type of argument is needed to properly distinguish argument strength from more general value-based components of such arguments. The overall conclusion of the article is that there is no justifiably unique solution to the problem of argument strength outside of a particular epistemological framework.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T12:30:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd7c106fc77549b4843954e92e262e0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0860-150X
2199-6059
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T12:30:24Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
spelling doaj.art-fd7c106fc77549b4843954e92e262e0f2022-12-21T20:21:25ZengSciendoStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric0860-150X2199-60592018-09-01551316210.2478/slgr-2018-0027slgr-2018-0027Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation GraphsRast Erich0New University of Lisbon,Lisbon, PortugalBipolar argument graphs represent the structure of complex pro and contra arguments for one or more standpoints. In this article, ampliative and exclusionary principles of evaluating argument strength in bipolar acyclic argumentation graphs are laid out and compared to each other. Argument chains, linked arguments, link attackers and supporters, and convergent arguments are discussed. The strength of conductive arguments is also addressed but it is argued that more work on this type of argument is needed to properly distinguish argument strength from more general value-based components of such arguments. The overall conclusion of the article is that there is no justifiably unique solution to the problem of argument strength outside of a particular epistemological framework.https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0027argument structureconductive argumentconvergent argumentpossibility theoryargument visualization
spellingShingle Rast Erich
Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
argument structure
conductive argument
convergent argument
possibility theory
argument visualization
title Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_full Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_fullStr Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_short Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_sort towards a model of argument strength for bipolar argumentation graphs
topic argument structure
conductive argument
convergent argument
possibility theory
argument visualization
url https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0027
work_keys_str_mv AT rasterich towardsamodelofargumentstrengthforbipolarargumentationgraphs