Pharmacological Studies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium: We Could Do Better

Belgium has actively participated in clinical research on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since the beginning of the pandemic to help identify effective and safe treatments for COVID-19. The objective of this review is to provide a picture of the clinical studies carried...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maya Hites, Jean-Louis Vincent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/7/1427
_version_ 1797433083654307840
author Maya Hites
Jean-Louis Vincent
author_facet Maya Hites
Jean-Louis Vincent
author_sort Maya Hites
collection DOAJ
description Belgium has actively participated in clinical research on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since the beginning of the pandemic to help identify effective and safe treatments for COVID-19. The objective of this review is to provide a picture of the clinical studies carried out in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Belgium. We collected data on all randomized, interventional trials in patients with COVID-19 that were registered on two recognized clinical trial registers, started enrollment before 31 December 2021, and included at least one patient in a Belgian center. Data were collected concerning the therapies investigated and the nature of the trials performed. Thirty-three hospitals (32% of all Belgian hospitals) participated in at least one of 28 trials (13 sponsored by the industry and 15 by academic centers) on therapeutics for COVID-19 in hospitalized patients: 7 (25%) evaluated antivirals, 17 (61%) immunomodulators, 2 (7%) anti-coagulants, and 1 (3%) nitric oxide to improve respiratory function. Nineteen (68%) were phase II trials. Only three (11%) of the trials were international platform trials. Despite numerous trials, less than 3% of all Belgian patients hospitalized with COVID-19 participated in a clinical trial on therapeutics. As in many other countries, more efforts could have been made to avoid running small, under-powered, mono- or bicenter trials, to create better collaboration between the different Belgian hospitals, and to participate in more international clinical trials, and more specifically in adaptive, platform trials.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:11:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd7eea38eeba482aa9680bea8b06ab58
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4915
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:11:05Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Viruses
spelling doaj.art-fd7eea38eeba482aa9680bea8b06ab582023-12-01T22:46:59ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152022-06-01147142710.3390/v14071427Pharmacological Studies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium: We Could Do BetterMaya Hites0Jean-Louis Vincent1Clinic of Infectious Diseases, HUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, BelgiumBelgium has actively participated in clinical research on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since the beginning of the pandemic to help identify effective and safe treatments for COVID-19. The objective of this review is to provide a picture of the clinical studies carried out in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Belgium. We collected data on all randomized, interventional trials in patients with COVID-19 that were registered on two recognized clinical trial registers, started enrollment before 31 December 2021, and included at least one patient in a Belgian center. Data were collected concerning the therapies investigated and the nature of the trials performed. Thirty-three hospitals (32% of all Belgian hospitals) participated in at least one of 28 trials (13 sponsored by the industry and 15 by academic centers) on therapeutics for COVID-19 in hospitalized patients: 7 (25%) evaluated antivirals, 17 (61%) immunomodulators, 2 (7%) anti-coagulants, and 1 (3%) nitric oxide to improve respiratory function. Nineteen (68%) were phase II trials. Only three (11%) of the trials were international platform trials. Despite numerous trials, less than 3% of all Belgian patients hospitalized with COVID-19 participated in a clinical trial on therapeutics. As in many other countries, more efforts could have been made to avoid running small, under-powered, mono- or bicenter trials, to create better collaboration between the different Belgian hospitals, and to participate in more international clinical trials, and more specifically in adaptive, platform trials.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/7/1427Belgiumadaptive platform trialssevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
spellingShingle Maya Hites
Jean-Louis Vincent
Pharmacological Studies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium: We Could Do Better
Viruses
Belgium
adaptive platform trials
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
title Pharmacological Studies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium: We Could Do Better
title_full Pharmacological Studies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium: We Could Do Better
title_fullStr Pharmacological Studies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium: We Could Do Better
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological Studies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium: We Could Do Better
title_short Pharmacological Studies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium: We Could Do Better
title_sort pharmacological studies in hospitalized covid 19 patients in belgium we could do better
topic Belgium
adaptive platform trials
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/7/1427
work_keys_str_mv AT mayahites pharmacologicalstudiesinhospitalizedcovid19patientsinbelgiumwecoulddobetter
AT jeanlouisvincent pharmacologicalstudiesinhospitalizedcovid19patientsinbelgiumwecoulddobetter