ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)

Abstract Background Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conductin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susanna Slater, Annette Bryant, Hsiang-Chi Chen, Ruwaida Begum, Isma Rana, Maria Aresu, Clare Peckitt, Oleg Zhitkov, Retchel Lazaro-Alcausi, Victoria Borja, Rachel Powell, David Lowery, Michael Hubank, Thereasa Rich, Gayathri Anandappa, Ian Chau, Naureen Starling, David Cunningham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4
_version_ 1797864464801857536
author Susanna Slater
Annette Bryant
Hsiang-Chi Chen
Ruwaida Begum
Isma Rana
Maria Aresu
Clare Peckitt
Oleg Zhitkov
Retchel Lazaro-Alcausi
Victoria Borja
Rachel Powell
David Lowery
Michael Hubank
Thereasa Rich
Gayathri Anandappa
Ian Chau
Naureen Starling
David Cunningham
author_facet Susanna Slater
Annette Bryant
Hsiang-Chi Chen
Ruwaida Begum
Isma Rana
Maria Aresu
Clare Peckitt
Oleg Zhitkov
Retchel Lazaro-Alcausi
Victoria Borja
Rachel Powell
David Lowery
Michael Hubank
Thereasa Rich
Gayathri Anandappa
Ian Chau
Naureen Starling
David Cunningham
author_sort Susanna Slater
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK’s first multi-centre, prospective, randomised study to determine whether a de-escalation strategy using ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy, as measured by 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in patients with resected CRC with no evidence of MRD (ctDNA negative post-operatively). In doing so we may be able to spare patients unnecessary chemotherapy and associated toxicity and achieve significant cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS). Methods We are recruiting patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III CRC who are being considered for ACT into the study which uses results from a plasma-only ctDNA assay to guide treatment decisions. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 3 years between the trial arms. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients in the ctDNA-guided arm who are ctDNA negative post-operatively and receive de-escalated ACT compared to the standard arm, the difference in overall survival (OS), neurotoxicity and quality of life between the arms, and the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided therapy compared to SOC treatment. We hypothesise that using a ctDNA-guided approach to ACT decisions is non-inferior to SOC. Target accrual is 1621 patients over 4 years, which will provide a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.1 to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1.25 in survival of the ctDNA-guided approach compared to SOC. We anticipate approximately 50 UK centres will participate. The study opened with the Guardant Reveal plasma-only ctDNA assay in August 2022. Discussion The trial will determine whether ctDNA guided ACT is non-inferior to SOC ACT in patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with the potential to significantly reduce unnecessary ACT and the toxicity associated with it. Trial registration NCT04050345.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:52:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd82327f73c3444fa40eeb618feddeee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:52:22Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-fd82327f73c3444fa40eeb618feddeee2023-03-22T11:35:03ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072023-03-012311910.1186/s12885-023-10699-4ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)Susanna Slater0Annette Bryant1Hsiang-Chi Chen2Ruwaida Begum3Isma Rana4Maria Aresu5Clare Peckitt6Oleg Zhitkov7Retchel Lazaro-Alcausi8Victoria Borja9Rachel Powell10David Lowery11Michael Hubank12Thereasa Rich13Gayathri Anandappa14Ian Chau15Naureen Starling16David Cunningham17Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustBiomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden and the Institute of Cancer ResearchCentre for Molecular Pathology at the The Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer ResearchGuardant Health, INCRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation TrustAbstract Background Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK’s first multi-centre, prospective, randomised study to determine whether a de-escalation strategy using ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy, as measured by 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in patients with resected CRC with no evidence of MRD (ctDNA negative post-operatively). In doing so we may be able to spare patients unnecessary chemotherapy and associated toxicity and achieve significant cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS). Methods We are recruiting patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III CRC who are being considered for ACT into the study which uses results from a plasma-only ctDNA assay to guide treatment decisions. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 3 years between the trial arms. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients in the ctDNA-guided arm who are ctDNA negative post-operatively and receive de-escalated ACT compared to the standard arm, the difference in overall survival (OS), neurotoxicity and quality of life between the arms, and the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided therapy compared to SOC treatment. We hypothesise that using a ctDNA-guided approach to ACT decisions is non-inferior to SOC. Target accrual is 1621 patients over 4 years, which will provide a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.1 to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1.25 in survival of the ctDNA-guided approach compared to SOC. We anticipate approximately 50 UK centres will participate. The study opened with the Guardant Reveal plasma-only ctDNA assay in August 2022. Discussion The trial will determine whether ctDNA guided ACT is non-inferior to SOC ACT in patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with the potential to significantly reduce unnecessary ACT and the toxicity associated with it. Trial registration NCT04050345.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4Colorectal cancerctDNAAdjuvant chemotherapyRandomisedDisease free survival
spellingShingle Susanna Slater
Annette Bryant
Hsiang-Chi Chen
Ruwaida Begum
Isma Rana
Maria Aresu
Clare Peckitt
Oleg Zhitkov
Retchel Lazaro-Alcausi
Victoria Borja
Rachel Powell
David Lowery
Michael Hubank
Thereasa Rich
Gayathri Anandappa
Ian Chau
Naureen Starling
David Cunningham
ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
BMC Cancer
Colorectal cancer
ctDNA
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Randomised
Disease free survival
title ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_full ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_fullStr ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_full_unstemmed ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_short ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_sort ctdna guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage ii or stage iii colorectal cancer a multi centre prospective randomised control trial tracc part c
topic Colorectal cancer
ctDNA
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Randomised
Disease free survival
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4
work_keys_str_mv AT susannaslater ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT annettebryant ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT hsiangchichen ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT ruwaidabegum ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT ismarana ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT mariaaresu ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT clarepeckitt ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT olegzhitkov ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT retchellazaroalcausi ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT victoriaborja ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT rachelpowell ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT davidlowery ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT michaelhubank ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT thereasarich ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT gayathrianandappa ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT ianchau ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT naureenstarling ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT davidcunningham ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc