An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cross-country comparisons of unofficial payments in the health sector are sparse. In 2002 we conducted a social audit of the health sector of the three Baltic States.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Some 10,320 househol...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2008-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/15 |
_version_ | 1818389343597756416 |
---|---|
author | Merhi Serge Mitchell Steve Milne Deborah Caldwell Dawn Paredes-Solís Sergio Andersson Neil Cockcroft Anne Roche Melissa Konceviciute Elena Ledogar Robert J |
author_facet | Merhi Serge Mitchell Steve Milne Deborah Caldwell Dawn Paredes-Solís Sergio Andersson Neil Cockcroft Anne Roche Melissa Konceviciute Elena Ledogar Robert J |
author_sort | Merhi Serge |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cross-country comparisons of unofficial payments in the health sector are sparse. In 2002 we conducted a social audit of the health sector of the three Baltic States.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Some 10,320 household interviews from a stratified, last-stage-random, sample of 30 clusters per country, together with institutional reviews, produced preliminary results. Separate focus groups of service users, nurses and doctors interpreted these findings. Stakeholder workshops in each country discussed the survey and focus group results.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Nearly one half of the respondents did not consider unofficial payments to health workers to be corruption, yet one half (Estonia 43%, Latvia 45%, Lithuania 64%) thought the level of corruption in government health services was high. Very few (Estonia 1%, Latvia 3%, Lithuania 8%) admitted to making unofficial payments in their last contact with the services. Around 14% of household members across the three countries gave gifts in their last contact with government services.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This social audit allowed comparison of perceptions, attitudes and experience regarding unofficial payments in the health services of the three Baltic States. Estonia showed least corruption. Latvia was in the middle. Lithuania evidenced the most unofficial payments, the greatest mistrust towards the system. These findings can serve as a baseline for interventions, and to compare each country's approach to health service reform in relation to unofficial payments.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T04:40:14Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fd862b8d48c044a79036e2c6eaa635f5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1472-6963 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T04:40:14Z |
publishDate | 2008-01-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Health Services Research |
spelling | doaj.art-fd862b8d48c044a79036e2c6eaa635f52022-12-21T23:16:50ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632008-01-01811510.1186/1472-6963-8-15An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic StatesMerhi SergeMitchell SteveMilne DeborahCaldwell DawnParedes-Solís SergioAndersson NeilCockcroft AnneRoche MelissaKonceviciute ElenaLedogar Robert J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cross-country comparisons of unofficial payments in the health sector are sparse. In 2002 we conducted a social audit of the health sector of the three Baltic States.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Some 10,320 household interviews from a stratified, last-stage-random, sample of 30 clusters per country, together with institutional reviews, produced preliminary results. Separate focus groups of service users, nurses and doctors interpreted these findings. Stakeholder workshops in each country discussed the survey and focus group results.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Nearly one half of the respondents did not consider unofficial payments to health workers to be corruption, yet one half (Estonia 43%, Latvia 45%, Lithuania 64%) thought the level of corruption in government health services was high. Very few (Estonia 1%, Latvia 3%, Lithuania 8%) admitted to making unofficial payments in their last contact with the services. Around 14% of household members across the three countries gave gifts in their last contact with government services.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This social audit allowed comparison of perceptions, attitudes and experience regarding unofficial payments in the health services of the three Baltic States. Estonia showed least corruption. Latvia was in the middle. Lithuania evidenced the most unofficial payments, the greatest mistrust towards the system. These findings can serve as a baseline for interventions, and to compare each country's approach to health service reform in relation to unofficial payments.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/15 |
spellingShingle | Merhi Serge Mitchell Steve Milne Deborah Caldwell Dawn Paredes-Solís Sergio Andersson Neil Cockcroft Anne Roche Melissa Konceviciute Elena Ledogar Robert J An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States BMC Health Services Research |
title | An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States |
title_full | An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States |
title_fullStr | An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States |
title_full_unstemmed | An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States |
title_short | An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States |
title_sort | inter country comparison of unofficial payments results of a health sector social audit in the baltic states |
url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merhiserge anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT mitchellsteve anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT milnedeborah anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT caldwelldawn anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT paredessolissergio anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT anderssonneil anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT cockcroftanne anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT rochemelissa anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT konceviciuteelena anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT ledogarrobertj anintercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT merhiserge intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT mitchellsteve intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT milnedeborah intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT caldwelldawn intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT paredessolissergio intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT anderssonneil intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT cockcroftanne intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT rochemelissa intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT konceviciuteelena intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates AT ledogarrobertj intercountrycomparisonofunofficialpaymentsresultsofahealthsectorsocialauditinthebalticstates |