Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric models

Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling in interaction with the surface fluxes, at the regional scale is developed within the frame of the European project CarboEurope-IP and its Regional Experiment component. In this context, five meso-scale meteorological models at 2 km resolution particip...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Pérez-Landa, H. W. Ter Maat, R. W. A. Hutjes, A. G. C. A. Meesters, L. F. Tolk, R. Ahmadov, C. Gerbig, A. J. Dolman, J. Noilhan, C. Sarrat, S. Donier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2007-12-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/4/1115/2007/bg-4-1115-2007.pdf
_version_ 1818146538186080256
author G. Pérez-Landa
H. W. Ter Maat
R. W. A. Hutjes
A. G. C. A. Meesters
L. F. Tolk
R. Ahmadov
C. Gerbig
A. J. Dolman
J. Noilhan
C. Sarrat
S. Donier
author_facet G. Pérez-Landa
H. W. Ter Maat
R. W. A. Hutjes
A. G. C. A. Meesters
L. F. Tolk
R. Ahmadov
C. Gerbig
A. J. Dolman
J. Noilhan
C. Sarrat
S. Donier
author_sort G. Pérez-Landa
collection DOAJ
description Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling in interaction with the surface fluxes, at the regional scale is developed within the frame of the European project CarboEurope-IP and its Regional Experiment component. In this context, five meso-scale meteorological models at 2 km resolution participate in an intercomparison exercise. Using a common experimental protocol that imposes a large number of rules, two days of the CarboEurope Regional Experiment Strategy (CERES) campaign are simulated. A systematic evaluation of the models is done in confrontation with the observations, using statistical tools and direct comparisons. Thus, temperature and relative humidity at 2 m, wind direction, surface energy and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, vertical profiles of potential temperature as well as in-situ CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations comparisons between observations and simulations are examined. These comparisons reveal a cold bias in the simulated temperature at 2 m, the latent heat flux is often underestimated. Nevertheless, the CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations heterogeneities are well captured by most of the models. <br><br> This intercomparison exercise shows also the models ability to represent the meteorology and carbon cycling at the synoptic and regional scale in the boundary layer, but also points out some of the major shortcomings of the models.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T12:20:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd8e99fdc3c248a987c1f393582c60c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T12:20:56Z
publishDate 2007-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-fd8e99fdc3c248a987c1f393582c60c92022-12-22T01:07:32ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892007-12-014611151126Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric modelsG. Pérez-LandaH. W. Ter MaatR. W. A. HutjesA. G. C. A. MeestersL. F. TolkR. AhmadovC. GerbigA. J. DolmanJ. NoilhanC. SarratS. DonierAtmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling in interaction with the surface fluxes, at the regional scale is developed within the frame of the European project CarboEurope-IP and its Regional Experiment component. In this context, five meso-scale meteorological models at 2 km resolution participate in an intercomparison exercise. Using a common experimental protocol that imposes a large number of rules, two days of the CarboEurope Regional Experiment Strategy (CERES) campaign are simulated. A systematic evaluation of the models is done in confrontation with the observations, using statistical tools and direct comparisons. Thus, temperature and relative humidity at 2 m, wind direction, surface energy and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, vertical profiles of potential temperature as well as in-situ CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations comparisons between observations and simulations are examined. These comparisons reveal a cold bias in the simulated temperature at 2 m, the latent heat flux is often underestimated. Nevertheless, the CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations heterogeneities are well captured by most of the models. <br><br> This intercomparison exercise shows also the models ability to represent the meteorology and carbon cycling at the synoptic and regional scale in the boundary layer, but also points out some of the major shortcomings of the models.http://www.biogeosciences.net/4/1115/2007/bg-4-1115-2007.pdf
spellingShingle G. Pérez-Landa
H. W. Ter Maat
R. W. A. Hutjes
A. G. C. A. Meesters
L. F. Tolk
R. Ahmadov
C. Gerbig
A. J. Dolman
J. Noilhan
C. Sarrat
S. Donier
Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric models
Biogeosciences
title Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric models
title_full Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric models
title_fullStr Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric models
title_full_unstemmed Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric models
title_short Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric models
title_sort atmospheric co sub 2 sub modeling at the regional scale an intercomparison of 5 meso scale atmospheric models
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/4/1115/2007/bg-4-1115-2007.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gperezlanda atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT hwtermaat atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT rwahutjes atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT agcameesters atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT lftolk atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT rahmadov atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT cgerbig atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT ajdolman atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT jnoilhan atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT csarrat atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels
AT sdonier atmosphericcosub2submodelingattheregionalscaleanintercomparisonof5mesoscaleatmosphericmodels