Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taeryool Koo, Kwang-Ho Cheong, Kyubo Kim, Hae Jin Park, Younghee Park, Hyeon Kang Koh, Byoung Hyuck Kim, Eunji Kim, Kyung Su Kim, Jin Hwa Choi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273395
_version_ 1811211388040773632
author Taeryool Koo
Kwang-Ho Cheong
Kyubo Kim
Hae Jin Park
Younghee Park
Hyeon Kang Koh
Byoung Hyuck Kim
Eunji Kim
Kyung Su Kim
Jin Hwa Choi
author_facet Taeryool Koo
Kwang-Ho Cheong
Kyubo Kim
Hae Jin Park
Younghee Park
Hyeon Kang Koh
Byoung Hyuck Kim
Eunji Kim
Kyung Su Kim
Jin Hwa Choi
author_sort Taeryool Koo
collection DOAJ
description We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify expert agreements. We generated volumes with a confidence level of 80% to compare the maximum distance to each CTV in six directions. The degree of agreement was moderate; overall kappa values were 0.573 for distal EBDC, 0.513 for proximal EBDC, and 0.511 for GBC. In the distal EBDC, a larger variation was noted in the right, post, and inferior direction. In the proximal EBDC, all borders except the right and left direction showed a larger variation. In the GBC, a larger variation was found in the anterior, posterior, and inferior direction. The posterior and inferior borders were the common area having discrepancies, associated with the insufficient coverage of the paraaortic node. A consensus guideline is needed to reduce inter-clinician variability in the CTVs and adequate coverage of regional lymph node area.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:13:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fd9769953dcd462caa774796ddca02e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:13:19Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-fd9769953dcd462caa774796ddca02e12022-12-22T03:46:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01179e027339510.1371/journal.pone.0273395Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.Taeryool KooKwang-Ho CheongKyubo KimHae Jin ParkYounghee ParkHyeon Kang KohByoung Hyuck KimEunji KimKyung Su KimJin Hwa ChoiWe aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify expert agreements. We generated volumes with a confidence level of 80% to compare the maximum distance to each CTV in six directions. The degree of agreement was moderate; overall kappa values were 0.573 for distal EBDC, 0.513 for proximal EBDC, and 0.511 for GBC. In the distal EBDC, a larger variation was noted in the right, post, and inferior direction. In the proximal EBDC, all borders except the right and left direction showed a larger variation. In the GBC, a larger variation was found in the anterior, posterior, and inferior direction. The posterior and inferior borders were the common area having discrepancies, associated with the insufficient coverage of the paraaortic node. A consensus guideline is needed to reduce inter-clinician variability in the CTVs and adequate coverage of regional lymph node area.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273395
spellingShingle Taeryool Koo
Kwang-Ho Cheong
Kyubo Kim
Hae Jin Park
Younghee Park
Hyeon Kang Koh
Byoung Hyuck Kim
Eunji Kim
Kyung Su Kim
Jin Hwa Choi
Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.
PLoS ONE
title Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.
title_full Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.
title_fullStr Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.
title_short Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.
title_sort variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273395
work_keys_str_mv AT taeryoolkoo variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT kwanghocheong variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT kyubokim variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT haejinpark variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT youngheepark variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT hyeonkangkoh variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT byounghyuckkim variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT eunjikim variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT kyungsukim variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT jinhwachoi variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer