Expert Interviews on the Key Points to Build China into a Strong Country on Intellectual Property Rights

[Purpose/Significance] This paper aims to discuss how to build China into a country that is strong on intellectual property rights (IPR), mainly from the aspects of building IPR information platforms, improving the measures in colleges and universities, for cultivating interdisciplinary IPR professi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: RAN Congjing, XIAO Dongmei, HUANG Haiying, WEN Yuheng, FANG Zhouzhi, LONG Jin, LIU Yan
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture 2022-07-01
Series:Nongye tushu qingbao xuebao
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nytsqb.aiijournal.com/fileup/1002-1248/PDF/1002-1248-2022-34-7-5.pdf
Description
Summary:[Purpose/Significance] This paper aims to discuss how to build China into a country that is strong on intellectual property rights (IPR), mainly from the aspects of building IPR information platforms, improving the measures in colleges and universities, for cultivating interdisciplinary IPR professionals completing overseas IPR protection policies, enhancing the governance capacity of IPR chain, focusing on high-quality creation of IPRs, and linking IPR public services and market services. [Method/Process] We interviewed a number of experts in the IPR field and invited them to make suggestions for building a country strong on IPRs. The interview topics mainly focus on the key points to build China into a strong country through intellectual property, such as IPR informatization, cultivating IPR professionals, legal guarantee for IPRs, data empowerment to IPRs, and IPRs' strategy and services. [Results/Conclusions] The construction of a strong country on IPRs requires multi-stakeholders' contribution. Firstly, stakeholders are supposed to build a one-stop IPR service platform, so as to improve their service capacity. Secondly, it is important to concentrate on the social needs and cultivate interdisciplinary IPR professionals to meet the needs. Thirdly, it is necessary to pay attention to the overseas IPR business and disputes, so the enterprises are able to improve their IPR layout and risk response capabilities. Fourthly, it is vital to improve the IPR governance ability guided by data empowering the high-quality development of IPRs. Fifthly, suggestions are put forward for implementing the strategy of high-quality development of IPRs in national policies, and leading innovative subjects to enhance IPR ability with strategic thinking of sustainable development. Last but not least, our country should vigorously promote the establishment of various IPR public service institutions at all levels to improve the coverage of IPR services.
ISSN:1002-1248