Is reliance on an inaccurate genome sequence sabotaging your experiments?
Advances in genomics have made whole genome studies increasingly feasible across the life sciences. However, new technologies and algorithmic advances do not guarantee flawless genomic sequences or annotation. Bias, errors, and artifacts can enter at any stage of the process from library preparation...
Main Authors: | Rodrigo P Baptista, Jessica C Kissinger |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-09-01
|
Series: | PLoS Pathogens |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007901 |
Similar Items
-
The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments
by: Mariëlle Stel, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
MIDAS: Computer application for the identification of exact and inaccurate microsatellites in genomic sequences
by: Carlos M. Martínez Ortiz
Published: (2019-01-01) -
STOP DOING THAT Sh*t : End Self-Sabotage and Demand Your Life Back /
by: Bishop, Gary John author
Published: (2019) -
Research of IT-sabotage Problem
by: Vladimir Sergeevich Makeev, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Inaccurate Multilocus Sequence Typing of Acinetobacter baumannii
by: Santiago Castillo-Ramírez, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)