Dynamic 18F-FDopa PET Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Gliomas: Is a Semiquantitative Model Sufficient?

PurposeDynamic amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) has become essential in neuro-oncology, most notably for its prognostic value in the noninvasive prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in newly diagnosed gliomas. The 6-[18F]fluoro-l-DOPA (18F-FDOPA) kinetic model has an u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothée Zaragori, Matthieu Doyen, Fabien Rech, Marie Blonski, Luc Taillandier, Laëtitia Imbert, Antoine Verger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.735257/full
_version_ 1818716320405913600
author Timothée Zaragori
Timothée Zaragori
Matthieu Doyen
Matthieu Doyen
Fabien Rech
Fabien Rech
Marie Blonski
Marie Blonski
Luc Taillandier
Luc Taillandier
Laëtitia Imbert
Laëtitia Imbert
Antoine Verger
Antoine Verger
author_facet Timothée Zaragori
Timothée Zaragori
Matthieu Doyen
Matthieu Doyen
Fabien Rech
Fabien Rech
Marie Blonski
Marie Blonski
Luc Taillandier
Luc Taillandier
Laëtitia Imbert
Laëtitia Imbert
Antoine Verger
Antoine Verger
author_sort Timothée Zaragori
collection DOAJ
description PurposeDynamic amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) has become essential in neuro-oncology, most notably for its prognostic value in the noninvasive prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in newly diagnosed gliomas. The 6-[18F]fluoro-l-DOPA (18F-FDOPA) kinetic model has an underlying complexity, while previous studies have predominantly used a semiquantitative dynamic analysis. Our study addresses whether a semiquantitative analysis can capture all the relevant information contained in time–activity curves for predicting the presence of IDH mutations compared to the more sophisticated graphical and compartmental models.MethodsThirty-seven tumour time–activity curves from 18F-FDOPA PET dynamic acquisitions of newly diagnosed gliomas (median age = 58.3 years, range = 20.3–79.9 years, 16 women, 16 IDH-wild type) were analyzed with a semiquantitative model based on classical parameters, with (SQ) or without (Ref SQ) a reference region, or on parameters of a fit function (SQ Fit), a graphical Logan model with input function (Logan) or reference region (Ref Logan), and a two-tissue compartmental model previously reported for 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of gliomas (2TCM). The overall predictive performance of each model was assessed with an area under the curve (AUC) comparison using multivariate analysis of all the parameters included in the model. Moreover, each extracted parameter was assessed in a univariate analysis by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.ResultsThe SQ model with an AUC of 0.733 for predicting IDH mutations showed comparable performance to the other models with AUCs of 0.752, 0.814, 0.693, 0.786, and 0.863, respectively corresponding to SQ Fit, Ref SQ, Logan, Ref Logan, and 2TCM (p ≥ 0.10 for the pairwise comparisons with other models). In the univariate analysis, the SQ time-to-peak parameter had the best diagnostic performance (75.7% accuracy) compared to all other individual parameters considered.ConclusionsThe SQ model circumvents the complexities of the 18F-FDOPA kinetic model and yields similar performance in predicting IDH mutations when compared to the other models, most notably the compartmental model. Our study provides supportive evidence for the routine clinical application of the SQ model for the dynamic analysis of 18F-FDOPA PET images in newly diagnosed gliomas.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T19:17:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fdbf2044432a406597e5ecacc6c5ee33
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T19:17:23Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-fdbf2044432a406597e5ecacc6c5ee332022-12-21T21:35:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-10-011110.3389/fonc.2021.735257735257Dynamic 18F-FDopa PET Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Gliomas: Is a Semiquantitative Model Sufficient?Timothée Zaragori0Timothée Zaragori1Matthieu Doyen2Matthieu Doyen3Fabien Rech4Fabien Rech5Marie Blonski6Marie Blonski7Luc Taillandier8Luc Taillandier9Laëtitia Imbert10Laëtitia Imbert11Antoine Verger12Antoine Verger13Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceIADI UMR 1254, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceIADI UMR 1254, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceDepartment of Neurosurgery, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceCentre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy CRAN UMR 7039, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceCentre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy CRAN UMR 7039, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceCentre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy CRAN UMR 7039, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceIADI UMR 1254, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceIADI UMR 1254, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FrancePurposeDynamic amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) has become essential in neuro-oncology, most notably for its prognostic value in the noninvasive prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in newly diagnosed gliomas. The 6-[18F]fluoro-l-DOPA (18F-FDOPA) kinetic model has an underlying complexity, while previous studies have predominantly used a semiquantitative dynamic analysis. Our study addresses whether a semiquantitative analysis can capture all the relevant information contained in time–activity curves for predicting the presence of IDH mutations compared to the more sophisticated graphical and compartmental models.MethodsThirty-seven tumour time–activity curves from 18F-FDOPA PET dynamic acquisitions of newly diagnosed gliomas (median age = 58.3 years, range = 20.3–79.9 years, 16 women, 16 IDH-wild type) were analyzed with a semiquantitative model based on classical parameters, with (SQ) or without (Ref SQ) a reference region, or on parameters of a fit function (SQ Fit), a graphical Logan model with input function (Logan) or reference region (Ref Logan), and a two-tissue compartmental model previously reported for 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of gliomas (2TCM). The overall predictive performance of each model was assessed with an area under the curve (AUC) comparison using multivariate analysis of all the parameters included in the model. Moreover, each extracted parameter was assessed in a univariate analysis by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.ResultsThe SQ model with an AUC of 0.733 for predicting IDH mutations showed comparable performance to the other models with AUCs of 0.752, 0.814, 0.693, 0.786, and 0.863, respectively corresponding to SQ Fit, Ref SQ, Logan, Ref Logan, and 2TCM (p ≥ 0.10 for the pairwise comparisons with other models). In the univariate analysis, the SQ time-to-peak parameter had the best diagnostic performance (75.7% accuracy) compared to all other individual parameters considered.ConclusionsThe SQ model circumvents the complexities of the 18F-FDOPA kinetic model and yields similar performance in predicting IDH mutations when compared to the other models, most notably the compartmental model. Our study provides supportive evidence for the routine clinical application of the SQ model for the dynamic analysis of 18F-FDOPA PET images in newly diagnosed gliomas.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.735257/fullDOPAPETcompartmental modelingdynamic analysisgliomaIDH mutation
spellingShingle Timothée Zaragori
Timothée Zaragori
Matthieu Doyen
Matthieu Doyen
Fabien Rech
Fabien Rech
Marie Blonski
Marie Blonski
Luc Taillandier
Luc Taillandier
Laëtitia Imbert
Laëtitia Imbert
Antoine Verger
Antoine Verger
Dynamic 18F-FDopa PET Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Gliomas: Is a Semiquantitative Model Sufficient?
Frontiers in Oncology
DOPA
PET
compartmental modeling
dynamic analysis
glioma
IDH mutation
title Dynamic 18F-FDopa PET Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Gliomas: Is a Semiquantitative Model Sufficient?
title_full Dynamic 18F-FDopa PET Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Gliomas: Is a Semiquantitative Model Sufficient?
title_fullStr Dynamic 18F-FDopa PET Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Gliomas: Is a Semiquantitative Model Sufficient?
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic 18F-FDopa PET Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Gliomas: Is a Semiquantitative Model Sufficient?
title_short Dynamic 18F-FDopa PET Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Gliomas: Is a Semiquantitative Model Sufficient?
title_sort dynamic 18f fdopa pet imaging for newly diagnosed gliomas is a semiquantitative model sufficient
topic DOPA
PET
compartmental modeling
dynamic analysis
glioma
IDH mutation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.735257/full
work_keys_str_mv AT timotheezaragori dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT timotheezaragori dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT matthieudoyen dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT matthieudoyen dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT fabienrech dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT fabienrech dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT marieblonski dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT marieblonski dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT luctaillandier dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT luctaillandier dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT laetitiaimbert dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT laetitiaimbert dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT antoineverger dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient
AT antoineverger dynamic18ffdopapetimagingfornewlydiagnosedgliomasisasemiquantitativemodelsufficient