Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population
Study DesignA retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric study of 84 C1pedicles in an Indian population focusing on critical morphometric dimensions vis-a-vis C1 pedicle screw placement.PurposeTo determine the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement in an Indian population and propo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Spine Society
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Asian Spine Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-679.pdf |
_version_ | 1828900128712294400 |
---|---|
author | Abhishek Srivastava Rajat Mahajan Ankur Nanda Geetanjali Nanda Nirajana Mishra Vijayant Kanagaraju Sahil Batra Harvinder Singh Chhabra |
author_facet | Abhishek Srivastava Rajat Mahajan Ankur Nanda Geetanjali Nanda Nirajana Mishra Vijayant Kanagaraju Sahil Batra Harvinder Singh Chhabra |
author_sort | Abhishek Srivastava |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Study DesignA retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric study of 84 C1pedicles in an Indian population focusing on critical morphometric dimensions vis-a-vis C1 pedicle screw placement.PurposeTo determine the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement in an Indian population and propose a novel classification system for the same.Overview of LiteratureAt present, C1 pedicle screws are rarely used, and very few studies have focused on the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in terms of racial, gender, and ethnic variations in anatomical structures. There are no CT-based data on C1 pedicles that assess the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in the Indian population.MethodsWe measured C1 pedicle diameter on CT coronal scan images of 42 adult patients. Extramedullary height (EMH) and intramedullary height (IMH) were measured. We examined the differences between the right and left atlas pedicles and compared measures between males and females. These data were analyzed using significance tests. Based on the results, we propose a novel classification system, which we believe will help in determining the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement.ResultsForty-two adult patients (84 pedicles) were examined. Average EMH and IMH were 4.48±0.91 and 0.86±0.77, respectively. Approximately, 32% of the C1 pedicles had bone thicknesses of <4 mm, 49% had IMH of <1 mm, and 38% had no pedicles. The average thickness in women was 4.21±0.93 mm, which was significantly thinner than that in men (4.73±0.81 mm, p=0.004). Right and left pedicles were not significantly different.ConclusionsOur data indicate that approximately one-third of the Indian population may not be suitable candidates for C1 pedicle screw placement. Caution should be exercised while placing type 1B and type 2 pedicles based on our proposed classification system. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T15:43:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fdc5ca5678a5476287484d175a2b27f2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1976-1902 1976-7846 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T15:43:35Z |
publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
publisher | Korean Spine Society |
record_format | Article |
series | Asian Spine Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-fdc5ca5678a5476287484d175a2b27f22022-12-21T23:39:47ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462017-10-0111567968510.4184/asj.2017.11.5.679272Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian PopulationAbhishek Srivastava0Rajat Mahajan1Ankur Nanda2Geetanjali Nanda3Nirajana Mishra4Vijayant Kanagaraju5Sahil Batra6Harvinder Singh Chhabra7Department of Spine Services, Primus Hospital, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, India.Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.Department of Radiodiagnosis, Mahajan Imaging Center, New Delhi, India.Independent Researcher, New Delhi, India.Department of Orthopedics, NMC Hospital, DIP, Dubai, UAE.Department of Spine Services, Caremax Superspeciality Hospital, Jalandhar, India.Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.Study DesignA retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric study of 84 C1pedicles in an Indian population focusing on critical morphometric dimensions vis-a-vis C1 pedicle screw placement.PurposeTo determine the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement in an Indian population and propose a novel classification system for the same.Overview of LiteratureAt present, C1 pedicle screws are rarely used, and very few studies have focused on the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in terms of racial, gender, and ethnic variations in anatomical structures. There are no CT-based data on C1 pedicles that assess the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in the Indian population.MethodsWe measured C1 pedicle diameter on CT coronal scan images of 42 adult patients. Extramedullary height (EMH) and intramedullary height (IMH) were measured. We examined the differences between the right and left atlas pedicles and compared measures between males and females. These data were analyzed using significance tests. Based on the results, we propose a novel classification system, which we believe will help in determining the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement.ResultsForty-two adult patients (84 pedicles) were examined. Average EMH and IMH were 4.48±0.91 and 0.86±0.77, respectively. Approximately, 32% of the C1 pedicles had bone thicknesses of <4 mm, 49% had IMH of <1 mm, and 38% had no pedicles. The average thickness in women was 4.21±0.93 mm, which was significantly thinner than that in men (4.73±0.81 mm, p=0.004). Right and left pedicles were not significantly different.ConclusionsOur data indicate that approximately one-third of the Indian population may not be suitable candidates for C1 pedicle screw placement. Caution should be exercised while placing type 1B and type 2 pedicles based on our proposed classification system.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-679.pdfAtlas anatomyCervical fixationAtlantoaxial fixationAtlanto-occipital fixationCervical pedicle screwsCervical posterior fixation |
spellingShingle | Abhishek Srivastava Rajat Mahajan Ankur Nanda Geetanjali Nanda Nirajana Mishra Vijayant Kanagaraju Sahil Batra Harvinder Singh Chhabra Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population Asian Spine Journal Atlas anatomy Cervical fixation Atlantoaxial fixation Atlanto-occipital fixation Cervical pedicle screws Cervical posterior fixation |
title | Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population |
title_full | Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population |
title_fullStr | Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population |
title_short | Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population |
title_sort | morphometric study of c1 pedicle and feasibility evaluation of c1 pedicle screw placement with a novel clinically relevant radiological classification in an indian population |
topic | Atlas anatomy Cervical fixation Atlantoaxial fixation Atlanto-occipital fixation Cervical pedicle screws Cervical posterior fixation |
url | http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-679.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abhisheksrivastava morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation AT rajatmahajan morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation AT ankurnanda morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation AT geetanjalinanda morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation AT nirajanamishra morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation AT vijayantkanagaraju morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation AT sahilbatra morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation AT harvindersinghchhabra morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation |