Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population

Study DesignA retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric study of 84 C1pedicles in an Indian population focusing on critical morphometric dimensions vis-a-vis C1 pedicle screw placement.PurposeTo determine the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement in an Indian population and propo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abhishek Srivastava, Rajat Mahajan, Ankur Nanda, Geetanjali Nanda, Nirajana Mishra, Vijayant Kanagaraju, Sahil Batra, Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2017-10-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-679.pdf
_version_ 1828900128712294400
author Abhishek Srivastava
Rajat Mahajan
Ankur Nanda
Geetanjali Nanda
Nirajana Mishra
Vijayant Kanagaraju
Sahil Batra
Harvinder Singh Chhabra
author_facet Abhishek Srivastava
Rajat Mahajan
Ankur Nanda
Geetanjali Nanda
Nirajana Mishra
Vijayant Kanagaraju
Sahil Batra
Harvinder Singh Chhabra
author_sort Abhishek Srivastava
collection DOAJ
description Study DesignA retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric study of 84 C1pedicles in an Indian population focusing on critical morphometric dimensions vis-a-vis C1 pedicle screw placement.PurposeTo determine the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement in an Indian population and propose a novel classification system for the same.Overview of LiteratureAt present, C1 pedicle screws are rarely used, and very few studies have focused on the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in terms of racial, gender, and ethnic variations in anatomical structures. There are no CT-based data on C1 pedicles that assess the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in the Indian population.MethodsWe measured C1 pedicle diameter on CT coronal scan images of 42 adult patients. Extramedullary height (EMH) and intramedullary height (IMH) were measured. We examined the differences between the right and left atlas pedicles and compared measures between males and females. These data were analyzed using significance tests. Based on the results, we propose a novel classification system, which we believe will help in determining the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement.ResultsForty-two adult patients (84 pedicles) were examined. Average EMH and IMH were 4.48±0.91 and 0.86±0.77, respectively. Approximately, 32% of the C1 pedicles had bone thicknesses of <4 mm, 49% had IMH of <1 mm, and 38% had no pedicles. The average thickness in women was 4.21±0.93 mm, which was significantly thinner than that in men (4.73±0.81 mm, p=0.004). Right and left pedicles were not significantly different.ConclusionsOur data indicate that approximately one-third of the Indian population may not be suitable candidates for C1 pedicle screw placement. Caution should be exercised while placing type 1B and type 2 pedicles based on our proposed classification system.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:43:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fdc5ca5678a5476287484d175a2b27f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:43:35Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Korean Spine Society
record_format Article
series Asian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-fdc5ca5678a5476287484d175a2b27f22022-12-21T23:39:47ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462017-10-0111567968510.4184/asj.2017.11.5.679272Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian PopulationAbhishek Srivastava0Rajat Mahajan1Ankur Nanda2Geetanjali Nanda3Nirajana Mishra4Vijayant Kanagaraju5Sahil Batra6Harvinder Singh Chhabra7Department of Spine Services, Primus Hospital, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, India.Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.Department of Radiodiagnosis, Mahajan Imaging Center, New Delhi, India.Independent Researcher, New Delhi, India.Department of Orthopedics, NMC Hospital, DIP, Dubai, UAE.Department of Spine Services, Caremax Superspeciality Hospital, Jalandhar, India.Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.Study DesignA retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric study of 84 C1pedicles in an Indian population focusing on critical morphometric dimensions vis-a-vis C1 pedicle screw placement.PurposeTo determine the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement in an Indian population and propose a novel classification system for the same.Overview of LiteratureAt present, C1 pedicle screws are rarely used, and very few studies have focused on the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in terms of racial, gender, and ethnic variations in anatomical structures. There are no CT-based data on C1 pedicles that assess the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in the Indian population.MethodsWe measured C1 pedicle diameter on CT coronal scan images of 42 adult patients. Extramedullary height (EMH) and intramedullary height (IMH) were measured. We examined the differences between the right and left atlas pedicles and compared measures between males and females. These data were analyzed using significance tests. Based on the results, we propose a novel classification system, which we believe will help in determining the feasibility of C1 pedicle screw placement.ResultsForty-two adult patients (84 pedicles) were examined. Average EMH and IMH were 4.48±0.91 and 0.86±0.77, respectively. Approximately, 32% of the C1 pedicles had bone thicknesses of <4 mm, 49% had IMH of <1 mm, and 38% had no pedicles. The average thickness in women was 4.21±0.93 mm, which was significantly thinner than that in men (4.73±0.81 mm, p=0.004). Right and left pedicles were not significantly different.ConclusionsOur data indicate that approximately one-third of the Indian population may not be suitable candidates for C1 pedicle screw placement. Caution should be exercised while placing type 1B and type 2 pedicles based on our proposed classification system.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-679.pdfAtlas anatomyCervical fixationAtlantoaxial fixationAtlanto-occipital fixationCervical pedicle screwsCervical posterior fixation
spellingShingle Abhishek Srivastava
Rajat Mahajan
Ankur Nanda
Geetanjali Nanda
Nirajana Mishra
Vijayant Kanagaraju
Sahil Batra
Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population
Asian Spine Journal
Atlas anatomy
Cervical fixation
Atlantoaxial fixation
Atlanto-occipital fixation
Cervical pedicle screws
Cervical posterior fixation
title Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population
title_full Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population
title_fullStr Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population
title_full_unstemmed Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population
title_short Morphometric Study of C1 Pedicle and Feasibility Evaluation of C1 Pedicle Screw Placement with a Novel Clinically Relevant Radiological Classification in an Indian Population
title_sort morphometric study of c1 pedicle and feasibility evaluation of c1 pedicle screw placement with a novel clinically relevant radiological classification in an indian population
topic Atlas anatomy
Cervical fixation
Atlantoaxial fixation
Atlanto-occipital fixation
Cervical pedicle screws
Cervical posterior fixation
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-679.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abhisheksrivastava morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation
AT rajatmahajan morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation
AT ankurnanda morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation
AT geetanjalinanda morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation
AT nirajanamishra morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation
AT vijayantkanagaraju morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation
AT sahilbatra morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation
AT harvindersinghchhabra morphometricstudyofc1pedicleandfeasibilityevaluationofc1pediclescrewplacementwithanovelclinicallyrelevantradiologicalclassificationinanindianpopulation