Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors

Problems in statistical auditing are usually one&#8315;sided. In fact, the main interest for auditors is to determine the quantiles of the total amount of error, and then to compare these quantiles with a given <i>materiality</i> fixed by the auditor, so that the accounting statement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María Martel-Escobar, Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo, Agustín Hernández-Bastida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-12-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/12/919
_version_ 1818013360056172544
author María Martel-Escobar
Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo
Agustín Hernández-Bastida
author_facet María Martel-Escobar
Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo
Agustín Hernández-Bastida
author_sort María Martel-Escobar
collection DOAJ
description Problems in statistical auditing are usually one&#8315;sided. In fact, the main interest for auditors is to determine the quantiles of the total amount of error, and then to compare these quantiles with a given <i>materiality</i> fixed by the auditor, so that the accounting statement can be accepted or rejected. Dollar unit sampling (DUS) is a useful procedure to collect sample information, whereby items are chosen with a probability proportional to book amounts and in which the relevant error amount distribution is the distribution of the taints weighted by the book value. The likelihood induced by DUS refers to a 201&#8315;variate parameter <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">p</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> but the prior information is in a subparameter <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>&#952;</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> linear function of <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">p</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>, representing the total amount of error. This means that partial prior information must be processed. In this paper, two main proposals are made: (1) to modify the likelihood, to make it compatible with prior information and thus obtain a Bayesian analysis for hypotheses to be tested; (2) to use a maximum entropy prior to incorporate limited auditor information. To achieve these goals, we obtain a modified likelihood function inspired by the induced likelihood described by Zehna (1966) and then adapt the Bayes&#8217; theorem to this likelihood in order to derive a posterior distribution for <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>&#952;</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. This approach shows that the DUS methodology can be justified as a natural method of processing partial prior information in auditing and that a Bayesian analysis can be performed even when prior information is only available for a subparameter of the model. Finally, some numerical examples are presented.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:32:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fdd85dcd0cdf482ca8161eb804716264
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:32:12Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-fdd85dcd0cdf482ca8161eb8047162642022-12-22T02:07:35ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002018-12-01201291910.3390/e20120919e20120919Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy PriorsMaría Martel-Escobar0Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo1Agustín Hernández-Bastida2Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, SpainDepartment of Quantitative Methods, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, SpainDepartment of Quantitative Methods, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, SpainProblems in statistical auditing are usually one&#8315;sided. In fact, the main interest for auditors is to determine the quantiles of the total amount of error, and then to compare these quantiles with a given <i>materiality</i> fixed by the auditor, so that the accounting statement can be accepted or rejected. Dollar unit sampling (DUS) is a useful procedure to collect sample information, whereby items are chosen with a probability proportional to book amounts and in which the relevant error amount distribution is the distribution of the taints weighted by the book value. The likelihood induced by DUS refers to a 201&#8315;variate parameter <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">p</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> but the prior information is in a subparameter <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>&#952;</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> linear function of <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">p</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>, representing the total amount of error. This means that partial prior information must be processed. In this paper, two main proposals are made: (1) to modify the likelihood, to make it compatible with prior information and thus obtain a Bayesian analysis for hypotheses to be tested; (2) to use a maximum entropy prior to incorporate limited auditor information. To achieve these goals, we obtain a modified likelihood function inspired by the induced likelihood described by Zehna (1966) and then adapt the Bayes&#8217; theorem to this likelihood in order to derive a posterior distribution for <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>&#952;</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. This approach shows that the DUS methodology can be justified as a natural method of processing partial prior information in auditing and that a Bayesian analysis can be performed even when prior information is only available for a subparameter of the model. Finally, some numerical examples are presented.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/12/919auditingBayesian inferencedollar unit samplingmodified likelihoodpartial prior information
spellingShingle María Martel-Escobar
Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo
Agustín Hernández-Bastida
Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
Entropy
auditing
Bayesian inference
dollar unit sampling
modified likelihood
partial prior information
title Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_full Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_fullStr Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_short Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_sort bayesian inference in auditing with partial prior information using maximum entropy priors
topic auditing
Bayesian inference
dollar unit sampling
modified likelihood
partial prior information
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/12/919
work_keys_str_mv AT mariamartelescobar bayesianinferenceinauditingwithpartialpriorinformationusingmaximumentropypriors
AT franciscojosevazquezpolo bayesianinferenceinauditingwithpartialpriorinformationusingmaximumentropypriors
AT agustinhernandezbastida bayesianinferenceinauditingwithpartialpriorinformationusingmaximumentropypriors