Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders

Smartwatches provide technology-based assessments in Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is necessary to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in order to include those devices in an assessment. We present unique results for sensor validation and disease classification via machine learning (ML). A compar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian Varghese, Catharina Marie van Alen, Michael Fujarski, Georg Stefan Schlake, Julitta Sucker, Tobias Warnecke, Christine Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/9/3139
_version_ 1797535604796293120
author Julian Varghese
Catharina Marie van Alen
Michael Fujarski
Georg Stefan Schlake
Julitta Sucker
Tobias Warnecke
Christine Thomas
author_facet Julian Varghese
Catharina Marie van Alen
Michael Fujarski
Georg Stefan Schlake
Julitta Sucker
Tobias Warnecke
Christine Thomas
author_sort Julian Varghese
collection DOAJ
description Smartwatches provide technology-based assessments in Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is necessary to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in order to include those devices in an assessment. We present unique results for sensor validation and disease classification via machine learning (ML). A comparison setup was designed with two different series of Apple smartwatches, one Nanometrics seismometer and a high-precision shaker to measure tremor-like amplitudes and frequencies. Clinical smartwatch measurements were acquired from a prospective study including 450 participants with PD, differential diagnoses (DD) and healthy participants. All participants wore two smartwatches throughout a 15-min examination. Symptoms and medical history were captured on the paired smartphone. The amplitude error of both smartwatches reaches up to 0.005 g, and for the measured frequencies, up to 0.01 Hz. A broad range of different ML classifiers were cross-validated. The most advanced task of distinguishing PD vs. DD was evaluated with 74.1% balanced accuracy, 86.5% precision and 90.5% recall by Multilayer Perceptrons. Deep-learning architectures significantly underperformed in all classification tasks. Smartwatches are capable of capturing subtle tremor signs with low noise. Amplitude and frequency differences between smartwatches and the seismometer were under the level of clinical significance. This study provided the largest PD sample size of two-hand smartwatch measurements and our preliminary ML-evaluation shows that such a system provides powerful means for diagnosis classification and new digital biomarkers, but it remains challenging for distinguishing similar disorders.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:47:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fddf2d23f8274b7eacea001c324f65a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:47:47Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-fddf2d23f8274b7eacea001c324f65a72023-11-21T18:00:40ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-04-01219313910.3390/s21093139Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement DisordersJulian Varghese0Catharina Marie van Alen1Michael Fujarski2Georg Stefan Schlake3Julitta Sucker4Tobias Warnecke5Christine Thomas6Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute of Geophysics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute of Geophysics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanySmartwatches provide technology-based assessments in Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is necessary to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in order to include those devices in an assessment. We present unique results for sensor validation and disease classification via machine learning (ML). A comparison setup was designed with two different series of Apple smartwatches, one Nanometrics seismometer and a high-precision shaker to measure tremor-like amplitudes and frequencies. Clinical smartwatch measurements were acquired from a prospective study including 450 participants with PD, differential diagnoses (DD) and healthy participants. All participants wore two smartwatches throughout a 15-min examination. Symptoms and medical history were captured on the paired smartphone. The amplitude error of both smartwatches reaches up to 0.005 g, and for the measured frequencies, up to 0.01 Hz. A broad range of different ML classifiers were cross-validated. The most advanced task of distinguishing PD vs. DD was evaluated with 74.1% balanced accuracy, 86.5% precision and 90.5% recall by Multilayer Perceptrons. Deep-learning architectures significantly underperformed in all classification tasks. Smartwatches are capable of capturing subtle tremor signs with low noise. Amplitude and frequency differences between smartwatches and the seismometer were under the level of clinical significance. This study provided the largest PD sample size of two-hand smartwatch measurements and our preliminary ML-evaluation shows that such a system provides powerful means for diagnosis classification and new digital biomarkers, but it remains challenging for distinguishing similar disorders.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/9/3139smartwatchesartificial intelligencemovement disordersParkinson’s disease
spellingShingle Julian Varghese
Catharina Marie van Alen
Michael Fujarski
Georg Stefan Schlake
Julitta Sucker
Tobias Warnecke
Christine Thomas
Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
Sensors
smartwatches
artificial intelligence
movement disorders
Parkinson’s disease
title Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_full Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_fullStr Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_short Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_sort sensor validation and diagnostic potential of smartwatches in movement disorders
topic smartwatches
artificial intelligence
movement disorders
Parkinson’s disease
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/9/3139
work_keys_str_mv AT julianvarghese sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT catharinamarievanalen sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT michaelfujarski sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT georgstefanschlake sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT julittasucker sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT tobiaswarnecke sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT christinethomas sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders