Comparison of Soft Tissue Profile between Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Aim:The aim of this study is to compare the soft tissue profiles of patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions originated from; maxillary retrusion, mandibular protrusion and the combination of maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion.Material and Method:Lateral cephalomet-ric radiographs o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gökmen Kurt, Ayşe Tuba Altuğ Ataç, Ayça Üstdal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2010-04-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-soft-tissue-profile-between-subgroup/53694
_version_ 1797767369871851520
author Gökmen Kurt
Ayşe Tuba Altuğ Ataç
Ayça Üstdal
author_facet Gökmen Kurt
Ayşe Tuba Altuğ Ataç
Ayça Üstdal
author_sort Gökmen Kurt
collection DOAJ
description Aim:The aim of this study is to compare the soft tissue profiles of patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions originated from; maxillary retrusion, mandibular protrusion and the combination of maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion.Material and Method:Lateral cephalomet-ric radiographs of 66 subjects were divided into three groups according to the Nperp-A and Nperp-Pg variables; Group 1-maxil-lary retrusion (n:23; mean age:13.44 years), Group 2-mandibular protrusion (n:22; mean age:13.31 years), and Group 3-combination of maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion (n:21; mean age:13.04 years). Besides the descriptive parameters of Class III subgroups, 13 soft tissue measurements (Gl-Sn, Sn-Me, ULL, St-Me, Sn-LLV, LLV-Me, interlabial distance, upper lip, lower lip, Chin, Gl-Sn/Sn-Me, Sn-St/St-Me and Sn-LLV/LLV-Me) were achieved for evaluating the possible differences between Class III subgroups. The differences between all Class III groups were evaluated by Analysis of Variance (ANO-VA) and Duncan test.Results:Chin measurement (distance between soft tissue pogonion to vertical reference plane) showed the highest value in Group 1 (5.14 ± 2,93) compared with Groups 2 (2.94 ± 2,15) and 3 (3.05 ± 1,98) (p<.01). Although the differences in Sn-Me and LLV-Me are insignificant among groups, these parameters representing the lower anterior soft tissue heights have the highest values in group 3. The rest of the parameters did not show statistical significance between the groups.Conclusion:Decreased lower lip and significantly increased soft tissue chin measurement were found in maxillary ret-rusion group. Both cephalometric and clinical examinations of soft tissues are needed for a proper diagnosis and treatment of orthognathic surgery cases.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:37:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fddf7f4953734a50b0e96f14531f6a27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:37:45Z
publishDate 2010-04-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-fddf7f4953734a50b0e96f14531f6a272023-08-01T12:08:27ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052010-04-01231304010.13076/1300-3550-23-1-3013049054Comparison of Soft Tissue Profile between Subgroups of Skeletal Class III MalocclusionGökmen Kurt0Ayşe Tuba Altuğ Ataç1Ayça Üstdal2 Erciyes, Faculty of Dentistry, Dept. Orthodontics, Kayseri, Turkey Ankara Univ. Faculty of Dentistry Dept. of Orthodontics, Ankara -Turkey Erciyes, Faculty of Dentistry, Dept. Orthodontics, Kayseri, Turkey Aim:The aim of this study is to compare the soft tissue profiles of patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions originated from; maxillary retrusion, mandibular protrusion and the combination of maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion.Material and Method:Lateral cephalomet-ric radiographs of 66 subjects were divided into three groups according to the Nperp-A and Nperp-Pg variables; Group 1-maxil-lary retrusion (n:23; mean age:13.44 years), Group 2-mandibular protrusion (n:22; mean age:13.31 years), and Group 3-combination of maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion (n:21; mean age:13.04 years). Besides the descriptive parameters of Class III subgroups, 13 soft tissue measurements (Gl-Sn, Sn-Me, ULL, St-Me, Sn-LLV, LLV-Me, interlabial distance, upper lip, lower lip, Chin, Gl-Sn/Sn-Me, Sn-St/St-Me and Sn-LLV/LLV-Me) were achieved for evaluating the possible differences between Class III subgroups. The differences between all Class III groups were evaluated by Analysis of Variance (ANO-VA) and Duncan test.Results:Chin measurement (distance between soft tissue pogonion to vertical reference plane) showed the highest value in Group 1 (5.14 ± 2,93) compared with Groups 2 (2.94 ± 2,15) and 3 (3.05 ± 1,98) (p<.01). Although the differences in Sn-Me and LLV-Me are insignificant among groups, these parameters representing the lower anterior soft tissue heights have the highest values in group 3. The rest of the parameters did not show statistical significance between the groups.Conclusion:Decreased lower lip and significantly increased soft tissue chin measurement were found in maxillary ret-rusion group. Both cephalometric and clinical examinations of soft tissues are needed for a proper diagnosis and treatment of orthognathic surgery cases. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-soft-tissue-profile-between-subgroup/53694 facial profilesoft tissueclass iii
spellingShingle Gökmen Kurt
Ayşe Tuba Altuğ Ataç
Ayça Üstdal
Comparison of Soft Tissue Profile between Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
facial profile
soft tissue
class iii
title Comparison of Soft Tissue Profile between Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
title_full Comparison of Soft Tissue Profile between Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
title_fullStr Comparison of Soft Tissue Profile between Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Soft Tissue Profile between Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
title_short Comparison of Soft Tissue Profile between Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
title_sort comparison of soft tissue profile between subgroups of skeletal class iii malocclusion
topic facial profile
soft tissue
class iii
url http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-soft-tissue-profile-between-subgroup/53694
work_keys_str_mv AT gokmenkurt comparisonofsofttissueprofilebetweensubgroupsofskeletalclassiiimalocclusion
AT aysetubaaltugatac comparisonofsofttissueprofilebetweensubgroupsofskeletalclassiiimalocclusion
AT aycaustdal comparisonofsofttissueprofilebetweensubgroupsofskeletalclassiiimalocclusion