Adoption of Machine Learning Systems for Medical Diagnostics in Clinics: Qualitative Interview Study

BackgroundRecently, machine learning (ML) has been transforming our daily lives by enabling intelligent voice assistants, personalized support for purchase decisions, and efficient credit card fraud detection. In addition to its everyday applications, ML holds the potential t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luisa Pumplun, Mariska Fecho, Nihal Wahl, Felix Peters, Peter Buxmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-10-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2021/10/e29301
_version_ 1797735709422911488
author Luisa Pumplun
Mariska Fecho
Nihal Wahl
Felix Peters
Peter Buxmann
author_facet Luisa Pumplun
Mariska Fecho
Nihal Wahl
Felix Peters
Peter Buxmann
author_sort Luisa Pumplun
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundRecently, machine learning (ML) has been transforming our daily lives by enabling intelligent voice assistants, personalized support for purchase decisions, and efficient credit card fraud detection. In addition to its everyday applications, ML holds the potential to improve medicine as well, especially with regard to diagnostics in clinics. In a world characterized by population growth, demographic change, and the global COVID-19 pandemic, ML systems offer the opportunity to make diagnostics more effective and efficient, leading to a high interest of clinics in such systems. However, despite the high potential of ML, only a few ML systems have been deployed in clinics yet, as their adoption process differs significantly from the integration of prior health information technologies given the specific characteristics of ML. ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the factors that influence the adoption process of ML systems for medical diagnostics in clinics to foster the adoption of these systems in clinics. Furthermore, this study provides insight into how these factors can be used to determine the ML maturity score of clinics, which can be applied by practitioners to measure the clinic status quo in the adoption process of ML systems. MethodsTo gain more insight into the adoption process of ML systems for medical diagnostics in clinics, we conducted a qualitative study by interviewing 22 selected medical experts from clinics and their suppliers with profound knowledge in the field of ML. We used a semistructured interview guideline, asked open-ended questions, and transcribed the interviews verbatim. To analyze the transcripts, we first used a content analysis approach based on the health care–specific framework of nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability. Then, we drew on the results of the content analysis to create a maturity model for ML adoption in clinics according to an established development process. ResultsWith the help of the interviews, we were able to identify 13 ML-specific factors that influence the adoption process of ML systems in clinics. We categorized these factors according to 7 domains that form a holistic ML adoption framework for clinics. In addition, we created an applicable maturity model that could help practitioners assess their current state in the ML adoption process. ConclusionsMany clinics still face major problems in adopting ML systems for medical diagnostics; thus, they do not benefit from the potential of these systems. Therefore, both the ML adoption framework and the maturity model for ML systems in clinics can not only guide future research that seeks to explore the promises and challenges associated with ML systems in a medical setting but also be a practical reference point for clinicians.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:02:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fdec9bb92583436189662f02fa77e2fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1438-8871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:02:01Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
spelling doaj.art-fdec9bb92583436189662f02fa77e2fa2023-08-28T19:32:09ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712021-10-012310e2930110.2196/29301Adoption of Machine Learning Systems for Medical Diagnostics in Clinics: Qualitative Interview StudyLuisa Pumplunhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8881-9587Mariska Fechohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-0415Nihal Wahlhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4840-216XFelix Petershttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7360-592XPeter Buxmannhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0235-4454 BackgroundRecently, machine learning (ML) has been transforming our daily lives by enabling intelligent voice assistants, personalized support for purchase decisions, and efficient credit card fraud detection. In addition to its everyday applications, ML holds the potential to improve medicine as well, especially with regard to diagnostics in clinics. In a world characterized by population growth, demographic change, and the global COVID-19 pandemic, ML systems offer the opportunity to make diagnostics more effective and efficient, leading to a high interest of clinics in such systems. However, despite the high potential of ML, only a few ML systems have been deployed in clinics yet, as their adoption process differs significantly from the integration of prior health information technologies given the specific characteristics of ML. ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the factors that influence the adoption process of ML systems for medical diagnostics in clinics to foster the adoption of these systems in clinics. Furthermore, this study provides insight into how these factors can be used to determine the ML maturity score of clinics, which can be applied by practitioners to measure the clinic status quo in the adoption process of ML systems. MethodsTo gain more insight into the adoption process of ML systems for medical diagnostics in clinics, we conducted a qualitative study by interviewing 22 selected medical experts from clinics and their suppliers with profound knowledge in the field of ML. We used a semistructured interview guideline, asked open-ended questions, and transcribed the interviews verbatim. To analyze the transcripts, we first used a content analysis approach based on the health care–specific framework of nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability. Then, we drew on the results of the content analysis to create a maturity model for ML adoption in clinics according to an established development process. ResultsWith the help of the interviews, we were able to identify 13 ML-specific factors that influence the adoption process of ML systems in clinics. We categorized these factors according to 7 domains that form a holistic ML adoption framework for clinics. In addition, we created an applicable maturity model that could help practitioners assess their current state in the ML adoption process. ConclusionsMany clinics still face major problems in adopting ML systems for medical diagnostics; thus, they do not benefit from the potential of these systems. Therefore, both the ML adoption framework and the maturity model for ML systems in clinics can not only guide future research that seeks to explore the promises and challenges associated with ML systems in a medical setting but also be a practical reference point for clinicians.https://www.jmir.org/2021/10/e29301
spellingShingle Luisa Pumplun
Mariska Fecho
Nihal Wahl
Felix Peters
Peter Buxmann
Adoption of Machine Learning Systems for Medical Diagnostics in Clinics: Qualitative Interview Study
Journal of Medical Internet Research
title Adoption of Machine Learning Systems for Medical Diagnostics in Clinics: Qualitative Interview Study
title_full Adoption of Machine Learning Systems for Medical Diagnostics in Clinics: Qualitative Interview Study
title_fullStr Adoption of Machine Learning Systems for Medical Diagnostics in Clinics: Qualitative Interview Study
title_full_unstemmed Adoption of Machine Learning Systems for Medical Diagnostics in Clinics: Qualitative Interview Study
title_short Adoption of Machine Learning Systems for Medical Diagnostics in Clinics: Qualitative Interview Study
title_sort adoption of machine learning systems for medical diagnostics in clinics qualitative interview study
url https://www.jmir.org/2021/10/e29301
work_keys_str_mv AT luisapumplun adoptionofmachinelearningsystemsformedicaldiagnosticsinclinicsqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT mariskafecho adoptionofmachinelearningsystemsformedicaldiagnosticsinclinicsqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT nihalwahl adoptionofmachinelearningsystemsformedicaldiagnosticsinclinicsqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT felixpeters adoptionofmachinelearningsystemsformedicaldiagnosticsinclinicsqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT peterbuxmann adoptionofmachinelearningsystemsformedicaldiagnosticsinclinicsqualitativeinterviewstudy