Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from Araneology

Planetary extinction of biodiversity underscores the need for taxonomy. Here, we scrutinize spider taxonomy over the last decade (2008–2018), compiling 2083 published accounts of newly described species. We evaluated what type of data were used to delineate species, whether data were made freely ava...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason E. Bond, Rebecca L. Godwin, Jordan D. Colby, Lacie G. Newton, Xavier J. Zahnle, Ingi Agnarsson, Chris A. Hamilton, Matjaž Kuntner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Diversity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/1/5
_version_ 1797494692595630080
author Jason E. Bond
Rebecca L. Godwin
Jordan D. Colby
Lacie G. Newton
Xavier J. Zahnle
Ingi Agnarsson
Chris A. Hamilton
Matjaž Kuntner
author_facet Jason E. Bond
Rebecca L. Godwin
Jordan D. Colby
Lacie G. Newton
Xavier J. Zahnle
Ingi Agnarsson
Chris A. Hamilton
Matjaž Kuntner
author_sort Jason E. Bond
collection DOAJ
description Planetary extinction of biodiversity underscores the need for taxonomy. Here, we scrutinize spider taxonomy over the last decade (2008–2018), compiling 2083 published accounts of newly described species. We evaluated what type of data were used to delineate species, whether data were made freely available, whether an explicit species hypothesis was stated, what types of media were used, the sample sizes, and the degree to which species constructs were integrative. The findings we report reveal that taxonomy remains largely descriptive, not integrative, and provides no explicit conceptual framework. Less than 4% of accounts explicitly stated a species concept and over one-third of all new species described were based on 1–2 specimens or only one sex. Only ~5% of studies made data freely available, and only ~14% of all newly described species employed more than one line of evidence, with molecular data used in ~6% of the studies. These same trends have been discovered in other animal groups, and therefore we find it logical that taxonomists face an uphill challenge when justifying the scientific rigor of their field and securing the needed resources. To move taxonomy forward, we make recommendations that, if implemented, will enhance its rigor, repeatability, and scientific standards.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:38:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe0ea75c9b8f43128cb68b5ee03c187e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-2818
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:38:00Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diversity
spelling doaj.art-fe0ea75c9b8f43128cb68b5ee03c187e2023-11-23T13:30:31ZengMDPI AGDiversity1424-28182021-12-01141510.3390/d14010005Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from AraneologyJason E. Bond0Rebecca L. Godwin1Jordan D. Colby2Lacie G. Newton3Xavier J. Zahnle4Ingi Agnarsson5Chris A. Hamilton6Matjaž Kuntner7Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USAFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 102 Reykjavik, IcelandDepartment of Entomology, Plant Pathology & Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USAEvolutionary Zoology Laboratory, Department of Organisms and Ecosystems Research, National Institute of Biology, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaPlanetary extinction of biodiversity underscores the need for taxonomy. Here, we scrutinize spider taxonomy over the last decade (2008–2018), compiling 2083 published accounts of newly described species. We evaluated what type of data were used to delineate species, whether data were made freely available, whether an explicit species hypothesis was stated, what types of media were used, the sample sizes, and the degree to which species constructs were integrative. The findings we report reveal that taxonomy remains largely descriptive, not integrative, and provides no explicit conceptual framework. Less than 4% of accounts explicitly stated a species concept and over one-third of all new species described were based on 1–2 specimens or only one sex. Only ~5% of studies made data freely available, and only ~14% of all newly described species employed more than one line of evidence, with molecular data used in ~6% of the studies. These same trends have been discovered in other animal groups, and therefore we find it logical that taxonomists face an uphill challenge when justifying the scientific rigor of their field and securing the needed resources. To move taxonomy forward, we make recommendations that, if implemented, will enhance its rigor, repeatability, and scientific standards.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/1/5Araneaetaxonomytaxonomic crisisspecies conceptsdata managementmonographic research
spellingShingle Jason E. Bond
Rebecca L. Godwin
Jordan D. Colby
Lacie G. Newton
Xavier J. Zahnle
Ingi Agnarsson
Chris A. Hamilton
Matjaž Kuntner
Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from Araneology
Diversity
Araneae
taxonomy
taxonomic crisis
species concepts
data management
monographic research
title Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from Araneology
title_full Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from Araneology
title_fullStr Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from Araneology
title_full_unstemmed Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from Araneology
title_short Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from Araneology
title_sort improving taxonomic practices and enhancing its extensibility an example from araneology
topic Araneae
taxonomy
taxonomic crisis
species concepts
data management
monographic research
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonebond improvingtaxonomicpracticesandenhancingitsextensibilityanexamplefromaraneology
AT rebeccalgodwin improvingtaxonomicpracticesandenhancingitsextensibilityanexamplefromaraneology
AT jordandcolby improvingtaxonomicpracticesandenhancingitsextensibilityanexamplefromaraneology
AT laciegnewton improvingtaxonomicpracticesandenhancingitsextensibilityanexamplefromaraneology
AT xavierjzahnle improvingtaxonomicpracticesandenhancingitsextensibilityanexamplefromaraneology
AT ingiagnarsson improvingtaxonomicpracticesandenhancingitsextensibilityanexamplefromaraneology
AT chrisahamilton improvingtaxonomicpracticesandenhancingitsextensibilityanexamplefromaraneology
AT matjazkuntner improvingtaxonomicpracticesandenhancingitsextensibilityanexamplefromaraneology